DEEP LEARNING FROM A PARTICIPATORY ASSESSMENT APPROACH BASED ON STUDENT EMPOWERMENT: A CASE STUDY IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Marisol del Carmen Alvarez Cisternas Universidad de las Américas, Facultad de Educación, Dirección de Desarrollo Docente de la Vicerrectoría Académica https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1418-9524
  • Margarita del Rosario Yau Flores Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Humanidades y Educación, Centro de Desarrollo Docente e Innovación Educativa, Vicerrectoría de Desarrollo de la Facultad https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-4703
  • Myrna Lilian Alvarez Castillo Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Humanidades y Educación, Centro de Desarrollo Docente e Innovación Educativa, Vicerrectoría de Desarrollo de la Facultad https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1601-8397

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4732

Keywords:

Students, Learning, Assessment, Participation, Collaboration, Empowerment, Critical Thinking, Analysis

Abstract

This study examines the impact of assessment strategies that foster deep learning within a transformational model focused on student empowerment. Deep learning is understood as students’ ability to build meaningful understanding, think critically, and transfer knowledge across contexts. Transformational assessment shifts attention from summative judgment to practices that promote continuous learning, reflection, and active participation. Student empowerment involves learners taking responsibility for selecting evidence, interpreting expectations, and using analytical rubrics to guide their performance. A qualitative–descriptive intrinsic case study was conducted with 20 university students participating in a learning experience based on transformational assessment. Data were collected from reflections, discussions, and analyses of assessment tasks using an inverse planning model and analytical rubrics, then coded thematically. Findings show that students strengthened critical and reflective skills by questioning and analyzing their own assessment tasks. Through inverse planning, they identified relevant evidence and exercised autonomy in assembling it according to rubric criteria. These strategies allowed them to move beyond memorization toward deeper understanding, critical analysis, and problem solving. The study suggests that empowerment-oriented assessment promotes autonomy and higher-order thinking, supporting efforts to enhance teaching quality. It demonstrates that assessment can become a transformative learning experience, positioning students as active and reflective agents in their educational development.

References

Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903

Alcántara, A. (2012). Gobernanza, gobierno y gobernabilidad en la educación superior. En B. Lerner, R. Uvalle y R. Moreno (Coords.), Gobernabilidad y gobernanza en los albores del siglo XXI y reflexiones sobre el México contemporáneo (163–191). UNAM-IIS / IAP AC. https://ru.iis.sociales.unam.mx/handle/IIS/4388

Anderson, A. (2000). Ethical Concerns and Reputation Risk Management: A Study of Leading U.K. Companies. London Business School.

Arredondo, F., De la Garza, J., & Vázquez, J. (2014). Transparencia en las organizaciones: Una aproximación desde la perspectiva de los colaboradores. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(133), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.06.007

Burnell, B. & Schnackenberg, H. (Eds.). (2014). The Ethics of Cultural Competence in Higher Education. Taylor & Francis.

Bolívar, A. (2012). Liderazgo educativo y mejora de la escuela. Graó.

Castellana, M., & Sala, I. (2005). La universidad ante la diversidad en el aula. Aula Abierta, 85, 57–84. https://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/ART9632/universidad_ante_diversidad_en_el_aula.pdf

Carrasco González, A. (2017). Los nuevos modelos de gobernanza universitaria. El caso de la Unión Europea como organismo supranacional que configura el sistema universitario español. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, Monográfico Extraordinario, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2017.m1.006

Cook, R., Beth, M., Kay, M., & Bottrell, M. (2015). Preventive ethics: Addressing ethics quality gaps on a systems level (2.ª ed.). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. https://www.ethics.va.gov/docs/integratedethics/pe_primer_2_edition_042015.pdf

Costa, J. D. (2008). The ethical imperative: Why moral leadership is good for business. Perseus Books.

Creighton, T. (2012). Educational leadership at 2050: Conjectures, challenges, and promises. Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Culham, T. (2012). Ethics education of business leaders: Emotional intelligence, virtues, and contemplative learning. Information Age Publishing.

Dantley, M. E., & Tillman, L. C. (2010). Social justice and moral transformative leadership. En C. Marshall & M. Oliva (Eds.), Leadership for social justice (2.ª ed., pp. 19–34). Pearson.

Duignan, P. (2012). Educational leadership: Together creating ethical environments (2.ª ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Equity Action Network Team (s. f.). Equity Continuum Tool: A framework for organizational reflection and action. Growing Inland Achievement. https://inlandempiregia.org/research/equity-continuum-tool-a-framework-for-organizational-reflection-and-action/

Furman, G. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191–229. DOI:10.1177/0013161X11427394

Ganga-Contreras, F., Quiroz, J., & Fossatti, P. (2017). Análisis sincrónico de la gobernanza universitaria: Una mirada teórica a los años sesenta y setenta. Revista Educação e Pesquisa, 43(2), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201608135289

Ganga-Contreras, F., Navarrete-Andrade, E., & Suárez-Amaya, W. (2017). Aproximación a los fundamentos teóricos del liderazgo auténtico. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 22(77), 36–55. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29051457004

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company. https://www.worldcat.org/title/discovery-of-grounded-theory-strategies-for-qualitative-research/oclc/237646

Gorski, P. (2010). Unlearning deficit ideology and the scornful gaze: Thoughts on authenticating the class discourse in education. Counterpoints, 402, 152-173. http://www.edchange.org/publications/deficit-ideology-scornful-gaze.pdf

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Hollie, S. (2011). Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching and learning: Classroom practices for student success. Shell Educational Publishing.

Hollie, S. (2019). Branding culturally relevant teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(4), 31–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26841575

Hollins, E. (2012a). Learning styles. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity. Sage.

Jardine, D. (2012). Pedagogy left in peace: Cultivating free spaces in teaching and learning. Continum.

Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360903556756

Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting Universal Design for Learning with Culturally Responsive Teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124518785012

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465

López, A. E. (2019). Culturally responsive and relevant leadership: Theory and practices. Springer.

Llorente Villasante, Á., Orozco Gómez, M. L., & Sanz Leal, M. (2024). La educación culturalmente receptiva: Análisis educativo del tercer espacio. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 36(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31408

Matus, J., Castillo, E., Barrios, K., Cortés, G., Muñoz, C., y Troncoso, M. (2025). La gestión de las Instituciones de Educación Superior sobre la convivencia, equidad de género, diversidad e inclusión: un análisis interdiscursivo. Comisión Nacional de Acreditación (CNA-Chile). https://www.cnachile.cl/noticias/paginas/La-CNA-Chile-publica-estudio-sobre-gesti%C3%B3n-de-las-IES-referente-a-la-convivencia,-equidad-de-g%C3%A9nero,-diversidad-e-inclusi%C3%B3n.aspx

Murillo, F. J. (2020). Liderazgo para la justicia social. Octaedro.

Palestini, R. (2012). Leadership with a conscience: Educational leadership as a moral science. Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244

Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

Ravitch, S. & Riggan, M. (2012). Reason & Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research. Sage.

Remolina, G. (2016). Desafíos de la planeación estratégica universitaria: Planeación pertinente. En Asuntos de gobierno universitario (p. 219). Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

Rodríguez-Ponce, E., Pedraja-Rejas, L., Delgado, M., & Rodríguez-Ponce, J. (2010). Gestión del conocimiento, liderazgo, diseño e implementación de la estrategia: un estudio empírico en pequeñas y medianas empresas. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 18(3), 373-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052010000300011

Santamaria, L. (2013). Critical change for the greater good: Multicultural perceptions in educational leadership toward social justice and equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(3), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13505287

Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2011). Ethical leadership and decision making in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Sleeter, C. (2018). La transformación del currículo en una sociedad diversa: ¿Quién y cómo se decide el currículum? RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 24(2), Article e13374. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.2.13374

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. DOI:10.1080/00131720508984678

Stembridge, A. (2020). Culturally responsive education in the classroom: An equity framework for pedagogy. Routledge.

Yamamoto, J. K., Gardiner, M. E., & Tenuto, P. L. (2014). Emotion in leadership: Secondary school administrators’ perceptions of critical incidents. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499260

Downloads

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Cisternas, M. del C. A., Flores, M. del R. Y., & Castillo, M. L. A. (2026). DEEP LEARNING FROM A PARTICIPATORY ASSESSMENT APPROACH BASED ON STUDENT EMPOWERMENT: A CASE STUDY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234732. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4732