RECONSTRUCTING INDONESIA’S NOTARY LAW TO REALIZE A BALANCED RIGHTS–DUTIES FRAMEWORK AND STRENGTHEN THE NOTARY’S CORE AUTHORITY OVER AUTHENTIC DEEDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4515Palavras-chave:
Notary, UUJN, Authentic Deed, Legal Harmonization, Rights–Duties Balance, Legislative ReconstructionResumo
This article presents a normative and reform-oriented argument for revising Indonesia's Notary Office Law (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris/UUJN) to establish a "balanced-value basis" between notaries' rights and obligations, while enhancing the notary's primary authority to produce authentic deeds. Building on doctrinal analysis and the dissertation's conceptual critique, the study shows that the current framework tends to maximize legal certainty for service users but leaves notaries exposed to asymmetrical burdens (administrative, civil, ethical, and potentially criminal risks) without a commensurate guarantee of justice and utility. The article proposes a legislative reconstruction agenda consisting of targeted amendments: first, recalibrating clauses that enable the transfer/exclusion of authentic-deed authority to other officials; second, harmonizing sectoral regulations that fragment notarial authority; and third, strengthening protections, funding, and institutional design for notarial supervision. The reform is grounded in constitutional commitments and a legal-philosophical priority for justice, particularly when rigid legality results in disproportionate harm. The article contributes a structured legislative roadmap to improve legal coherence, professional accountability, and public trust in authentic instruments.
Referências
Adjie, H. (2009). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama. ISBN: 9791073120
Azwar, T. K. D., & Sirait, N. N. (2025). Legal and ethical dimensions of notary involvement in medical equipment procurement corruption. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i1.1375
de Castro, A. (2024). The Insignificance Principle between Germany and Brazil: a Cautionary Tale on Legal Imports. Crim Law Forum 35, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-024-09480-4
Delmas, C. (2023). The feminisation of the notary profession in France: end of a patriarchal bastion or sedimentation of a gender stratification? International Journal of the Legal Profession, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2023.2190898
Dewi, I. G. A. M. S. (2025). Kewenangan Notaris dan PPAT dalam Membuat Akta Otentik Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Aktual Justice, 10(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.70358/aktualjustice.v10i1.1519
Fransiska, L. (2021) Degradasi Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Pembatalan Akta Autentik (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia NO. 2377K/PDT/2016), Indonesian Notary, 3 Art. 22. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss2/22
Gultom, O. B., et.al. (2020). The role of notaries in the economic growth of Medan City. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 452 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012038
Hidayat, A. R. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris terhadap Pembatalan Akta Melalui Putusan Pengadilan yang Berimplikasi Kepada Prinsip Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 773 PK/Pdt/2019). Tesis, Program Magister Kenotariatan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/21481/1/TESIS%2520ARIEF%2520RAHMAN%2520HIDAYAT%25202020020006.pdf
Holidi, M. (2023). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik Dalam Proses Peradilan Perdata Pada Pengadilan Negri di Yogyakarta: The Power of Proof of Authentic Deeds in Civil Court Proceedings at the State Court in Yogyakarta. JURIDICA: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 4(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridicaugr.v4i2.220
Kristianto, E., Kencanawati, E. & Anwar, K. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Atas Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris yang Disangkal dalam Proses Peradilan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.6854
Kunitsina, O. A. (2025). Liability as an element of notary status. Russian Journal Of Legal Studies (Moscow), 12(3), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS690117
Kurniawan, I. D., & Ezzerouali, S. (2024). Revisiting the Principle of Legal Certainty: A Contemporary Analysis through the Lens of Legal Positivism. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies, 3(2), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17385496
Lubis, F., et.al. (2025). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan dalam Sengketa Perdata. Tahkim, 21(1), 25-39. https://jurnal.iainambon.ac.id/index.php/THK/article/view/10670/2480
Lubis, M. F. et.al. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Notaris yang Melakukan Pemalsuan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dan Kuasa Menjual (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 933 K/PID/2023). Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1-19. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/2564
Manullang, E. F. M. (2022). Misinterpretasi Ide Gustav Radbruch mengenai Doktrin Filosofis tentang Validitas dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 453-480. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.453-480
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cet. 12, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. ISBN: 9786027985162
Penny, J. & Dianti, F. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Dakwaan Turut Membantu Tindak Pidana Penipuan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 20 PK/PID/2020. Indonesian Notary, 4(2), 1499-1522. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss2/24
Pratiwi, Y. I., Halim, H. & Said, N. (2022). The Validity of the Notary Deed to Review A Type of Error Using A Pen Eraser. Awang Long Law Review, 5(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.540
Quist, P. H. N. (2024). 48. Een tuchtigende tik op de vingers. Juridische Berichten voor het Notariaat, 11, 9-11. https://qgmlaw.com/content/uploads/2024/11/JBN-2024-48-Een-tuchtigende-tik-op-de-vingers-P.H.N.-Quist.pdf
Randomis, A. N. (2025). Regulation of Legal Protection for Notaries in Performing Official Duties to Ensure Legal Certainty and Justice. Injurity: Interdisciplinary Journal and Humanity, 4(11), 969-975. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i10.1333
Rossulliati, D. et al. (2023). Criminal Liability of Notary in Criminal Act Committed by Notary Signing Agent. Yuris: Journal of Court & Justice, 2(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v2i1.258
Soekanto, S. & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. ISBN: 9794212598
Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283
Tešić, N., Kovačević, L. (2025). Access to Justice Through Public Notary Service in the Republic of Serbia: How Can the Gender Perspective Move Things Forward?. In: Baer, S., Jelić, I., Krstić, I. (eds) The Gender and the Judiciary. Gender Perspectives in Law, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06885-9_6
Tripipo, A. Z., Rembrandt, & Hasbi. (2025). Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Tidak Dibacakan Notaris Di Hadapan Para Pihak (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.351 PK/PDT/2018). Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(4), 879-895. https://doi.org/10.31933/ws1xgd96
Werik, B., Sriono, S. & Siahaan, N. (2025). Legal Responsibility Of Notaries In Making Authentic Deeds Based On The Civil Code. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 4(6). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1671
Zabyelina, Y. & Thachuk, K. L. (eds). (2024). The Private Sector and Organized Crime: Criminal Entrepreneurship, Illicit Profits, and Private Sector Security Governance, 1st Ed., Routledge, London. ISBN: 9781032056654
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0





