CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW REFORM: AGAINST INDONESIA'S PRE-TRIAL RULING

Autores/as

  • Andi Muhammad Alqadri Syarif Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
  • M. Syukri Akub Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
  • Nur Azisa Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5196

Palabras clave:

Pretrial, Criminal Procedure Law Reform, Judicial Supervision, Legal Uncertainty, Appeal Mechanism, Criminal Justice System

Resumen

The reform of Indonesia's criminal procedure law emphasizes effective supervision of law enforcement through the pretrial stage. However, this study identifies fundamental weaknesses in the current system: limited judicial authority, the finality of decisions without appeal mechanisms, and the high subjectivity of single-judge trials. While the Constitutional Court expanded the scope of pretrial objects, this development has triggered legal uncertainty and procedural debates rather than resolving systemic issues. Using a normative juridical approach, this research analyzes legal gaps in existing regulations. The study argues that merely extending examination periods or shifting to a panel of judges is insufficient. Consequently, this paper proposes a critical reconstruction of Article 164 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code to allow all pretrial rulings to be appealed to the High Court. This reform aims to ensure judicial accountability, provide equal rights protection for all parties, and strengthen the integrity of the Indonesian criminal justice system.

Citas

Abdaud, F. (2018). Upaya Hukum Pascaputusan Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Menegakkan Hukum Dan Keadilan. Jurnal Al-‘Adl, 11(2), 1–13.

Afandi, F. (2016). Perbandingan Praktik Praperadilan Dan Pembentukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 28(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15868

Andi Sofyan. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar (2nd ed.). Prenada Media.

Arifin, S. (2020). perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dalam Tindak Pidana terorisme. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 5(1), 49–62.

Arifin, S. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap anak sebagai kurir narkotika. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1).

Darwin, D., & Suhaimi. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 12(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.31289/MERCATORIA.V12I1.2363

Fadilah, L. N., & Atthahara, H. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH TERKAIT PENANGANAN PERNIKAHAN DI INDIA DAN JEPANG. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 7(1), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.22437/JSSH.V7I1.23928

Faisal, F. (2023). Pre-Trial in Indonesia: Why it Should be Reformed. Jurnal Jurisprudentie, 10(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v10i2.43678

Firmansyah, S. H., & Farid, A. M. (2022). Politik Hukum Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.15195

Hariri, A., & Arifin, S. (2023). Analysis Of Local Government Policy Model In Preventing Corruption In A Village Government Sector. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 8(2), 290–300.

Hartono, M. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Penggunaan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 282.

Home, R. K., & Armia, M. S. (2025). Decolonising Israel/Palestine: an Approach To the Legal History of the Middle East. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.805

Hutabalian, M. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Sah Tidaknya Sebuah Penangkapan, Penahanan, dan Penetapan Tersangka Berdasarkan Putusan Praperadilan: Legal Review of the Legitimacy of an Arrest, Detention, and Determination of a Suspect Based on a Pretrial Decision. Reformasi Hukum, 27(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.46257/JRH.V27I1.563

Hutagalung, R. T., & Seregig, I. K. (2025). Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Pembatalan Tersangka Karena Objek Perkara Kewenangan Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) (Studi Putusan Nomor :2/Pid.Pra/2024/PN.Kbu). Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(1), 4659–4666. https://doi.org/10.31004/INNOVATIVE.V5I1.18020

Jidatul Haz, M. A., Wathoni, L. M. N., Zulkarnain, Maghfurrahman, M., & Baldan Haramin, F. (2024). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: A NEW APPROACH TO RESOLVING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 7(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.30863/ALDUSTUR.V7I2.7399

Kadir, Z. K. (2024). Menulis Ulang Keadilan: Bagaimana Doktrin Suppression of Evidence dalam Preseden Amerika Serikat Menata Kembali Prosedur Peradilan Pidana. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(4), 1–18.

Kripsiaji, D., & Minarno, N. B. (2022). Perluasan Kewenangan dan Penegakan Hukum Praperadilan di Indonesia dan Belanda. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v10i1.2573

Kusumastuti, E. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan. Yuridika, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20473/YDK.V33I1.7258

Lian, T., & Purba, D. (2017). Praperadilan sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka. Papua Law Journal, 1(2), 253–270.

Mahmud, A., Firman, Z. C. A., Syawali, H., Rizki, & Weganisa. (2021). Keadilan Substantif Dalam Proses Asset Recovery Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 3(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.26740/JSH.V3N2.P227-250

Munthe, D. M. S. G., Gaol, S. L., & Sudarto. (2024). KEPEMILIKAN TANAH HAK MILIK BEKAS BARAT (EIGENDOM VERPONDING) SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1960 TENTANG PERATURAN DASAR POKOK-POKOK AGRARIA. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.52249/ILR.V4I2.505

Muryawan, A. G., Mashdurohatun, A., Sri, & Wahyuningsih, E. (2023). LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PRETRIAL PROCEDURE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE APPLICANT OR THE APPLICANT ASSOCIATED WITH JUSTICE VALUE-BASED REMEDY. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 132(0), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/132-06

Rahman, Hakis, Syahputra, D., & Yakir, J. (2023). Problematics of Contemporary Problems and Cultural Poverty Challenges. Journal International Dakwah and Communication, 2(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.55849/jidc.v2i2.190

Rannu, D. A., & Adhari, A. (2025). MULTIPLICITY OF CRIMES IN INDONESIAN LAW: REGULATION AND DETERMINATION OF CONCURSUS REALIS. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30863/ALDUSTUR.V8I1.8633

Rusman Sumadi. (2021). Praperadilan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Dalam Melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tersangka. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.597

Sari, S. W. N., & Sazali, A. (2025). STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NOMOR 04/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.JKT.SEL DALAM TINJAUN YURIDIS DAN FILOSOFIS TERHADAP PENETAPAN TERSANGKA SEBAGAI OBJEK GUGATAN PRAPERADILAN PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA. SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.71456/SULTAN.V3I2.1381

Suhardjo. (2019). Kewenangan Praperadilan Dalam Menentukan Tersangka Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 2, 132–148.

Tornado, A. S. (2018). PRAPERADILAN : Sarana Perlindungan Tersangka Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Ifrani (ed.)). Penerbit Nusa Media.

UPR, I. C. S. I. (2022). Police Violence and Criminal Procedure Law Issues. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform Rumah Cemara Submission for UPR Indonesia.

Waluyadi, Muslikhah, & Mariana, M. (2025). UNDERSTANDING JUDGE’S DECISIONS THAT ARE BEST FOR THE CHILD POST THE FAILURE OF DIVERSION. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 10(1), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.22373/PETITA.V10I1.455

Wibowo, R. A., Yuniza, M. E., Widyaningtyas, R. S., & Noor, H. J. (2018). WACANA PEMERINTAH UNTUK MEREPOSISI KELEMBAGAAN INSPEKTORAT: TINDAK LANJUT, TANGGAPAN, SERTA INISIASI KEDEPAN. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 716–742. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1800

Widyastuti, I. A. W., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Sugiartha, I. N. G. (2020). Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Memutus Perkara Praperadilan Mengenai Tidak Sahnya Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2519.351-355

Yunita, N. (2023). Ratio Decidendi Terhadap Penetapan Tersangka Putusan Praperadilan Pengadilan Negeri Serang (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NO 11/PID.PRA/2023/PN.SRG). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 13.

en Abdullah, M. (n.d.). Urgensi Perlunya Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Nasional di Indonesia yang Lebih Responsif. 20(1), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i1.885

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-05

Cómo citar

Syarif, A. M. A., Akub, M. S., & Azisa, N. (2026). CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW REFORM: AGAINST INDONESIA’S PRE-TRIAL RULING. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e235196. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5196

Número

Vol. 23 (2026): Veredas do Direito, v. 23, 2026

Sección

Articles

Licencia

I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.

I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.

 

Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0