THE CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF THE PAPUAN PEOPLE'S ASSEMBLY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT IN THE LAND OF PAPUA

Authors

  • Dorsinta Rita Lasmawati Hutabarat Pattimura University
  • S. E. M. Nirahua Pattimura University
  • J. Tjiptabudi Pattimura University
  • J. J. Pietersz Pattimura University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4754

Keywords:

Special Autonomy, Papua, Papuan People's Assembly (MRP), Customary Law, Hawear

Abstract

Background: The enactment of Law No. 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for Papua Province grants broad authority to the government and the Papuan people to autonomously manage their territory within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This special autonomy entails significant responsibility for the provincial government and its people to administer governance and regulate natural resources to achieve maximum prosperity for Indigenous Papuans. Methods: This study employs normative legal research supported by an empirical approach. The research identifies legal rules, principles, and doctrines to address specific legal issues, particularly concerning the impact of the Hawear (Sasi) cultural practices on marine resource management under statutory provisions. Secondary data were analyzed juridically and complemented by primary field data. Results: The findings indicate that Special Autonomy strengthens the position of the Papuan People's Assembly (MRP) as a cultural representation institution with strategic authority. The MRP's role is reflected in its "Veto" power or binding considerations regarding certain matters, including the approval of Gubernatorial and Vice-Gubernatorial candidates (who must be Indigenous Papuans), the protection of indigenous rights, and policies regarding natural resource utilization. The MRP serves as an official aspiration channel for indigenous communities, women, and religious leaders to ensure that government policies align with cultural preservation and the welfare of Indigenous Papuans.

References

Agus Sumule, Finding a Middle Way for Special Autonomy of Papua Province, Gramedia, Jakarta, 2003.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005, Legal Research, Jakarta: Kencana.

Soejono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, Research Methods, University of Indonesia 2020.

Rules of Engagement:

Government Regulation No. 54 of 2004 concerning the Papuan People's Assembly

Perdasus of Papua Province No. 4 of 2008 concerning the Implementation of Duties and Authorities of Government Regulation No. 54 of 2004 concerning the Papuan People's Assembly

Indonesian Constitution. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (Fourth Amendment).

Indonesian Government Regulation. (2004). Government Regulation No. 54 of 2004 concerning the Papuan People's Assembly (MRP).

Indonesian Law. (2001). Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Papua Province.

Indonesian Law. (2008). Law Number 35 of 2008 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for the Papua Province.

Jurnal

Alifuddin, M., Iye, R., & Abida, F. I. N. (2024). Conflict and Consensus in The Dynamics of Islamic and Christian Relations in Tolaki Tribe in Indonesia. Kalam, 18(2), 181-200.

Nawawi, M., Yusuf, S., Sam, B., & Iye, R. (2022). Effectiveness of Early Marriage on The Protection of Children's Rights: indonesia. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 8(3), 870-876.

Rukua, D., Lapandewa, M. N. L., Yusuf, S., & Sam, B. THE ROLE OF THE VILLAGE PERMUSYAWARATAN AGENCY IN IMPLEMENTING VILLAGE GOVERNMENT IN MALUKU VILLAGE KARANG JAYA (Peran Badan Permusyawaratan dalam Pelaksanaan Pemerintah Desa di Desa Karang.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-04

How to Cite

Hutabarat, D. R. L., Nirahua, S. E. M., Tjiptabudi, J., & Pietersz, J. J. (2026). THE CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF THE PAPUAN PEOPLE’S ASSEMBLY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT IN THE LAND OF PAPUA . Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234754. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4754