CONVENIOS DE INCLUSIÓN SOCIAL: MODELO PARA OPTIMIZAR LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS DE POSTULACIÓN DE FUNDACIONES COOPERANTES EN ECUADOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6185Palavras-chave:
Modelo de Gestión, Inclusión Social, Eficiencia Institucional, Postulación, Fundaciones CooperantesResumo
Esta investigación desplega empíricamente un Modelo de gestión de convenios de inclusión social para optimizar los procedimientos de postulación de fundaciones cooperantes en Ecuador durante 2025. Desde un enfoque cuantitativo, aplicada, de tipo causal explicativa y diseño pre-experimental, se aplicaron encuestas estructuradas a una muestra de 92 personas de representantes de fundaciones, antes y después de implementar el modelo propuesto, mediante instrumentos validados que midieron dimensiones de convenios de inclusión social y postulación de fundaciones cooperantes. Los resultados muestran mejoras significativas en los niveles de eficiencia, claridad de requisitos y transparencia de la evaluación de postulaciones. El análisis inferencial evidenció que el modelo tuvo un impacto estadísticamente significativo en todos los indicadores evaluados. La discusión contrastó estos hallazgos con teorías de gestión pública y estudios previos, confirmando la validez de los seis axiomas derivados de los objetivos específicos. Se concluye que el modelo desarrollado no solo optimiza los procedimientos, sino que también fortalece la articulación institucional y la equidad en el acceso a convenios. Se recomienda institucionalizar el modelo en las entidades públicas locales y capacitar a los actores involucrados. Finalmente, se presenta una propuesta técnica estructurada en fases, con dimensiones operativas, normativas y comunicativas, orientada a su implementación sostenible.
Referências
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Attaran, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Information & Management, 41(5), 585–596.
Blind, P. K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394.
Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. Jossey-Bass.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (2020). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 61(2), 11–27.
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
Gómez, P., & Herrera, A. (2020). Participación ciudadana y rediseño de procesos administrativos en el sector público colombiano. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 53(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.18235/rla.2020.53.1.3
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business.
Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2014). Business process management. Routledge.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Review Press.
Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/249742
Kim, S. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705278595
Laguna, M., & Marklund, J. (2013). Business process modeling, simulation and design. CRC Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. Free Press.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
Ostroff, F. (1999). The horizontal organization: What the organization of the future looks like and how it delivers value to customers. Oxford University Press.
Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizens' attitudes toward transparency in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296777
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis — New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Trkman, P. (2010). The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003
Vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods, and information systems (2nd ed.). Springer.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
