THE IMPACT OF ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT DURING THE LESSONS IN SCHOOLS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5582

Palavras-chave:

Active Learning Methods, Engagement, Students, Teaching, Motivation

Resumo

This empirical study examines the impact of active learning methods on student engagement during the teaching process, focusing on how these methods contribute to improving the quality of learning and increasing students’ participation in the classroom. A mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) was employed, enabling a more comprehensive and reliable analysis of the studied phenomenon. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and direct classroom observations, providing a realistic overview of students’ behavior and perceptions during the learning process.The study sample consisted of 25 sixth-grade students who actively participated in learning activities where methods such as group work, discussion, and brainstorming were implemented. These methods aimed to enhance interaction, collaboration, and critical thinking among students. Observations indicated that students showed greater interest and were more willing to participate when active methods were used, compared to traditional teaching approaches.The results of the study indicate that the majority of students feel more engaged when active learning methods are applied. Specifically, about 80% of students prefer group work, 75% show increased participation during discussions, and 70% report better understanding of the learning content. Additionally, an increase in motivation and collaboration among students was observed, demonstrating that active methods have a significant impact on improving both engagement and learning outcomes.

Referências

Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-04-15

Como Citar

Thaqi, V., Atanasoska, T., & Shala, L. (2026). THE IMPACT OF ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT DURING THE LESSONS IN SCHOOLS. Veredas Do Direito , 23(6), e235582. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5582