THE IMPACT OF ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT DURING THE LESSONS IN SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5582Keywords:
Active Learning Methods, Engagement, Students, Teaching, MotivationAbstract
This empirical study examines the impact of active learning methods on student engagement during the teaching process, focusing on how these methods contribute to improving the quality of learning and increasing students’ participation in the classroom. A mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) was employed, enabling a more comprehensive and reliable analysis of the studied phenomenon. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and direct classroom observations, providing a realistic overview of students’ behavior and perceptions during the learning process.The study sample consisted of 25 sixth-grade students who actively participated in learning activities where methods such as group work, discussion, and brainstorming were implemented. These methods aimed to enhance interaction, collaboration, and critical thinking among students. Observations indicated that students showed greater interest and were more willing to participate when active methods were used, compared to traditional teaching approaches.The results of the study indicate that the majority of students feel more engaged when active learning methods are applied. Specifically, about 80% of students prefer group work, 75% show increased participation during discussions, and 70% report better understanding of the learning content. Additionally, an increase in motivation and collaboration among students was observed, demonstrating that active methods have a significant impact on improving both engagement and learning outcomes.
References
Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0



