CRIMINAL POLICY FOR CHILDREN WHO COMMIT CRIMES FREQUENTLY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF LEGAL GOALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.4715Palavras-chave:
Criminal, Policy, Criminal Acts, ChildrenResumo
Criminal policy towards children who repeatedly commit criminal acts from the perspective of legal objectives, particularly within the Indonesian juvenile justice system. Practice of applying diversion to children who repeat offences still faces various substantial challenges, due to legal provisions that tend to limit the application of diversion for repeat cases, as well as less-than-optimal law enforcement effectiveness in promoting the social reintegration of children who are repeat offenders. This study emphasises the need for repeated reformulations of child criminal policy, which not only considers the repressive aspects but also prioritises the legal objectives of protection, rehabilitation, and preventing recidivism through a legal approach that is orientated towards the best interests of the child.
Referências
Ashworth A, Zedner L. Defending the criminal law: reflections on the changing character of crime, procedure, and sanctions. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2008;2:21–51.
Ávila H. Legal certainty. In: Certainty in Law. Springer; 2016. p. 55–119.
Bintang HM, Bayuandri KS, Safitri S. Relationship between law and social justice values of Pancasila for the life of Indonesian society. LEX Social Journal of Law and Public Administration. 2024;1:122–129.
Day A, Chung D, O’Leary P, Carson E. Programs for men who perpetrate domestic violence: an examination of the issues underlying the effectiveness of intervention programs. Journal of Family Violence. 2009;24:203–212.
Dkk BLT. Teori hukum: strategi tertib manusia lintas ruang dan generasi. 2013.
Gallagher ME, Dong B. Legislating harmony. In: Kuruvilla S, Lee CK, Gallagher ME, editors. From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Work and State in a Changing China. Ithaca; 2011. p. 36–60.
Gershoff ET, et al. The strength of the causal evidence against physical punishment of children and its implications for parents, psychologists, and policymakers. American Psychologist. 2018;73:626.
Hart HM Jr. The aims of the criminal law. Law and Contemporary Problems. 1958;23:401.
Hudson BA. Penal policy and social policy. In: Penal Policy and Social Justice. Springer; 1993. p. 89–121.
Kaushal S. Punishment for crimes: an instrument of social change. In: Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop. 2020;9.
Kieliszek Z. Philosophical views on justice: a study of the concepts of justice in different traditions of philosophy. European Chronicle. 2024;9:28–38.
Košatka M. The role of criminal history in sentencing theory and practice. 2024.
Leksono SC, Purnomo H. Criminal justice system in the perspective of integration. International Journal of Asia Pacific Collaboration. 2023;1:82–90.
Marasabessy F, Sugiri B, Ratnohadi H. Non-penal policy in prosecution termination (reconstructing criminal law through restorative justice). IBLAM Law Review. 2025;5:34–42.
McCaghy C, Capron T, Jamieson JD, Carey SH. Deviant behavior: crime, conflict, and interest groups. Routledge; 2016.
Mears DP. Towards rational and evidence-based crime policy. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2007;35:667–682.
Munro E. The Munro review of child protection: final report, a child-centred system. The Stationery Office; 2011.
Packer H. The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford University Press; 1968.
Parker RW. The problem with scorecards: how (and how not) to measure the cost-effectiveness of economic sanctions. Michigan Journal of International Law. 1999;21:235.
Pound R. Justice according to law. Columbia Law Review. 1913;13:696.
Rasdi R, Pujiyono P, Rochaeti N, Rehulina R. Reformulation of the criminal justice system for children in conflict based on Pancasila justice. Lex Scientia Law Review. 2022;6:479–518.
Robinson PH, Darley JM. Intuitions of justice: implications for criminal law and justice policy. Southern California Law Review. 2007;81:1.
Rodriguez AM. Criminal policy: new challenges, old ways. Cahiers de Défense Sociale. 2003;182:212.
Slone DC, Choi H. Crime and community well-being: the role of social capital and collective efficacy in increasing safety. In: Social Factors and Community Well-Being. Springer; 2016. p. 87–99.
Snacken S, van Zyl Smit D. Distinctive features of European penology and penal policy-making. In: European Penology. 2013. p. 3–26.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
