THE CONCEPT OF POPASAANGU CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE SETTLEMENT OF CHILD CRIMINAL OFFENSES IN INDONESIA

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4747

Palabras clave:

Customary Law, Popasaangu Fikiri, Juvenile Criminal Offenses, Restorative Justice, Customary Dispute Resolution

Resumen

Many cases of juvenile criminal offenses occur and are not necessarily resolved thru formal processes. This is because the implementation of restorative justice thru diversion, which was expected to provide a win-win solution at the police, prosecutor's office, and court levels as mandated by the Juvenile Criminal Justice Act, has not yet met public expectations. The type of research used in the preparation of this dissertation proposal is empirical legal research. The urgency of this research is to formulate the concept of resolving minor crimes committed by children within the Popasaangu Fikiri custom. This research uses the type of empirical legal research. The research results show that philosophically, Popasaangu Fikiri is based on the worldview of indigenous communities that highly value balance, humanity, and social harmony. Justice is understood not as retribution, but as the restoration of honor and social relationships thru three main stages: recognition of wrongdoing, apology and forgiveness, and the reaffirmation of social relationships. The novelty of this research lies in the discovery of a restorative-communal conceptual model for resolving minor criminal offenses by children, where Popasaangu Fikiri not only serves as a mechanism for customary peace but also as a social recovery legal system that unites moral, social, and legal values within a single customary justice process. This model differs from the concept of restorative justice in the modern juvenile justice system because it emphasizes restoring honor and social balance, rather than simply repairing harm or mediating between the offender and the victim. Thus, Popasaangu Fikiri makes a new conceptual contribution to the development of a customary law-based paradigm for resolving child criminal cases that is humanistic, participatory, and socially just.

Citas

A. Suryaman Mustari Pide, (2014). Customary Law, Past, Present and Future, Jakarta: Kencana, pp. 1-2

Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, 2010. Introduction to legal Research Methods, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, Hlm 32

Article 1 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection

Article 1 paragraph (6) of Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

Article 28 B paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Bedner, A., & van Huis, S. (2010). Plurality of Law and the Problem of Justice in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 185–204

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press

Braithwaite, Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, hlm. 55–60

Daly, K. (2008). Restorative Justice and Youth Justice: Where Next? Youth Justice, 8(3), 215–228.

Daly, K. (2016). What is Restorative Justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29.

Davies, S. G., & Robson, J. (2016). Juvenile (in)justice: children in conflict with the law in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 17(1), 119-147

Hollander, J. (2020). Integrating Customary Justice into National Legal Frameworks: Southeast Asian Experiences. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 233–256

Hollander, J. (2020). Integrating Customary Justice into National Legal Frameworks: Southeast Asian Experiences. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 233–256

Howard Zehr, The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Good Books, 2015

Huma, A. (2015). Customary Law and Restorative Justice: Indigenous Perspectives from Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 46(4), 586–603.

Interview with Imran Kudus, Wolio Customary Cultural Expert from Baubau City, on November 30, 2024.

Interview with Imran Kudus, Wolio Customary Cultural Expert from Baubau City, on November 30, 2024.

Irianto, S. (2019). “Pluralism and Restorative Justice in Indonesian Legal Practices.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3), 245–264

Irianto, S. (2019). Pluralism and Restorative Justice in Indonesian Legal Practices. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3), 245-264

Johnny Ibrahim and Jonaedi Efendi, Normative and Empirical Legal Research Methods, Depok: Prenadamedia Group, 2016, p. 151.

Kathleen J. Bergseth, Jeffrey A. Bouffard. The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 35, Issue 4, July–August 2007, Pages 433-451

Kurniawan, A. (2025). Restorative Justice And Customary Law Studies In Juvenile Cases: Why Should Indonesia Learn From Various Countries?. Lex localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(5), 2843-2853

Lexy J. Moleong, Qualitative Research Methodology, Edisi Revisi (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019), hlm. 280.

M.B. Hooker, Adat Law in Modern Indonesia, Oxford University Press, 1978

Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection. (2020). Annual Report on Child Protection.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2018. Qualitative Research Methodology. Revised Edition. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Page 86.

R. Soepomo, (2007). Chapters on Customary Law (17th edition), Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, p.

Regulation of the Governor of Southeast Sulawesi Number 56 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for Facilitating Community Organizations in the Fields of Culture, Palaces, and Traditional Institutions in the Preservation and Development of Regional Culture in Southeast Sulawesi Province

Renhard Harve, Syafruddin Kalo, Alvi Syahrin, Ediwarman. Synchronization of Laws and Application of Diversion in Children Criminal Laws in Conflict. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science Vol 16 Issue 2 July – December 2021. 358–368

S. Arifianto, 2016. Implementation of the Case Study Research with a Qualitative Approach, Aswaja Pressindo, Yogyakarta. Hlm 36

Sugiyono. 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta, p. 85

Sulistyowati (2019). “Pluralism and Restorative Justice in Indonesian Legal Practices.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3), 245–264.

Susanto, E., & Hidayat, M. (2022). Restorative Justice and the Effectiveness of Diversion in the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70, 101–118.

Von Benda-Beckmann, F. & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2011), “Myths and stereotypes about adat law: A reassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia”, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. 167(2–3), 167–195.

Widjajanto, A., Astawa, I. G. P., & Rulyandi, M. (2025). Decolonising restorative justice in Indonesia: a comparative study across Customary Law traditions. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 470-492.

Zinsstag, E., & Vanfraechem, I. (2012). Restorative Justice and Youth: The Need for a Child-Centered Approach. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 623–640

Zubaedah, S., Tira, A., & Almusawir, A. (2023). Implementation of Diversion on Examining the Process of Children in Conflict with the Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 221-236.

Zurbuchen, M. (2018). Law, Morality and Community in Indonesian Adat Practices. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (BKI), 174(2–3), 178–203.

Zurn, C., & Tadros, V. (2020). “Restorative Justice and the Moral Agency of the Offender.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 48(1), 1–33.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-02-17

Cómo citar

Abdullah, L. O. D., Asis, A., & Musakkir. (2026). THE CONCEPT OF POPASAANGU CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE SETTLEMENT OF CHILD CRIMINAL OFFENSES IN INDONESIA. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234747. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4747