POST-SOVIET MIGRATION PROCESSES IN CENTRAL ASIA:A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY WITHIN THE CENTRAL ASIA–RUSSIA–CHINA MIGRATION SYSTEM (KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN, AND TAJIKISTAN)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5657

Keywords:

Post-Soviet Migration, Central Asia, Comparative Case Study, Remittances, Migration Systems, Russia, China

Abstract

This study analyzes post-Soviet migration processes in Central Asia through a comparative case study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan within the Central Asia–Russia–China migration system. Drawing on migration systems theory, the research adopts a structured-focused comparative approach to examine how national structural conditions and institutional access to migration channels shape migration pathways and development outcomes. Using a quantitative–descriptive design, the analysis triangulates World Bank remittance indicators, International Organization for Migration regional reports, and institutional context related to Russia-oriented labor migration and China-oriented selective mobility. The findings reveal substantial cross-national differentiation. Kazakhstan functions as a regional migration hub and partial destination with diversified mobility patterns and limited remittance dependence. Kyrgyzstan relies heavily on Russia-oriented labor migration, with moderate to high remittance dependence and partial diversification toward selective channels. Tajikistan exhibits the highest level of remittance dependence and structural vulnerability, reflecting strong reliance on a single destination corridor. Across cases, Russia-oriented migration provides significant short-term income stabilization, whereas China-oriented migration is smaller in scale but more closely associated with skill formation potential. The study concludes that Central Asian migration operates as a multi-nodal and hierarchical system, with distinct development implications depending on national position. Policy implications stress the need for diversification of migration pathways, improved migration governance, and stronger links between migration and human capital development.

References

Buckley, C. J., Ruble, B. A., & Hofmann, E. T. (2012). Migration, identity, and urban governance in post-Soviet Eurasia. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

de Haas, H. (2010). The internal dynamics of migration processes: A theoretical inquiry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1587–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489361

Heleniak, T. (2003). Migration in the CIS: Regional patterns and policy issues. Migration Information Source, 1–15.

International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) / Prague Process. (2024). Impacts of Russia’s war in Ukraine on migration in Central Asia (Policy brief).

International Organization for Migration. (2025). Europe and Central Asia: Region on the move—Migration data report 2023–2024. IOM.

Laruelle, M. (2018). Russia’s Central Asia policy and the role of migration. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Round, J., & Kuznetsova, I. (2016). Necropolitics and the migrant: Russia’s migration regime. Political Geography, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.12.002

Tishkov, V., Zayinchkovskaya, Z., & Vitkovskaya, G. (2005). Migration in the countries of the former Soviet Union. Human Development Research Paper (UNDP).

World Bank. (2019). Migration and remittances: Recent developments and outlook. World Bank.

World Bank. (2023). Personal remittances, received (% of GDP). World Development Indicators.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Zhi, Y., Рыспаевна, Ж. А., An, B., Pan, L., & Liu, J. (2026). POST-SOVIET MIGRATION PROCESSES IN CENTRAL ASIA:A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY WITHIN THE CENTRAL ASIA–RUSSIA–CHINA MIGRATION SYSTEM (KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN, AND TAJIKISTAN). Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235657. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5657