DIGITAL LEARNING TOOLS AND SOCIAL COLLABORATION IN CLASSROOMS: TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES IN ENHANCING PEER INTERACTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4854

Keywords:

Digital Learning Tools, Primary Education, Peer Collaboration, Social Constructivism, Teacher Perceptions, Pakistan, Educational Technology Integration

Abstract

The widespread integration of digital learning tools has transformed traditional teaching methods, particularly in primary education, where fostering social development is fundamental. This qualitative exploratory study examines how teachers in private primary schools in Islamabad and Rawalpindi perceive the role of digital tools in enhancing peer interaction and collaborative learning. Grounded in Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory, the research investigates experiences with platforms such as Google Classroom, Seesaw, Microsoft Teams, Jamboard, and Padlet, focusing on their impact on communication, teamwork, and social cognition among young learners. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 purposively selected teachers and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that digital tools facilitate active participation, foster inclusive learning environments, and support the development of core social competencies, including empathy, collective problem-solving, and group decision-making. While teachers acknowledged these benefits, they also noted challenges such as limited device access, unstable internet connectivity, insufficient training, and concerns regarding excessive screen time. The study underscores the critical role of teachers as mediators of digital interaction and calls for structured professional development programs and equitable infrastructural support to optimize technology integration. This study contributes context-specific insights to global research on educational technology by highlighting the unique socio-pedagogical dynamics in Pakistan’s private primary schools. It offers recommendations for policy formulation, teacher training, and curriculum design aimed at strengthening the role of digital tools for collaborative learning. Further research is suggested to explore similar dynamics in public school settings and to directly incorporate student perspectives.

References

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2018). Computational Thinking and Coding for Every Student: The Teacher’s Getting-Started Guide. Teachers College Press.

Culala, H. J. D. (2016). Educating generation alpha: What are the demands of the 21st century workforce? Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/24526330/Educating_generation _alpha_What_are_the_demands_of_the_21st_century_workforce

Ertmer, P. A. (2019). Addressing the challenge of integrating educational technology in K-12 schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1045-1054.

Farooq B. (2023). ADB Highlights Disparities Between Public and Private Education Systems in Pakistan. ProPakistani. https://propakistani.pk/2023/12/29/adb-highlights-disparities-between-public-and-private-education-systems-in-pakistan/

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Jones, A. (2022). The Impact of Digital Learning Policies on Primary Education. Journal of Educational Policy, 45(3), 321-335

Kajander, A., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2018). Teacher professional development for digital literacy integration: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1261-1287.

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190. doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225

Radesky, J. S., Christakis, D. A., Hill, D. A., Leone, R., & Perrin, E. M. (2020). Mobile and Interactive Media Use by Young Children: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown. Pediatrics, 146(5), e2020005787

Rodriguez, M. a. B. (2023, October 20). Children and Technology: positive and negative effects Maryville Online. Maryville University Online. https://online.maryville.edu/blog/children-and-technology/

Sälzer, C., Götz, T., & Fischbach, A. (2020). Preschoolers' Use of Educational Apps and Its Relation to Early Numeracy and Literacy Skills. Computers & Education, 157, 103959.

Soldatova, G., & Vishneva, A. (2019). Features of the Development of the Cognitive Sphere in Children with Different Online Activities: Is There a Golden Mean? Konsulʹtativnaâ Psihologiâ I Psihoterapiâ, 27(3), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2019270307

Technology in Early Childhood Education Statistics Statistics: Market Data Report 2024. (n.d.). https://worldmetrics.org/technology-in-early-childhood-education-statistics/

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 92, 145-157.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yasa AD, Handayanto SK, editors. TPACK-based science learning assessment in elementary school teachers with analytical hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods. AIP Conference Proceedings; 2021: AIP Publishing LLC.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Umelaila, Mahnoor, A., Iqbal, S., & Iftikhar, H. (2026). DIGITAL LEARNING TOOLS AND SOCIAL COLLABORATION IN CLASSROOMS: TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES IN ENHANCING PEER INTERACTION. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234854. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4854