SOCIALLY TRANSFORMATIVE SUBJECTIVITY IN THE POST-SOVIET RUSSIAN SPACE: ANTHROPOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4832

Keywords:

Philosophical Anthropology, Anthropological Model, Cultural And Civilizational Identity, Russian World, Subjectivity

Abstract

To examine the anthropological foundations of socially transformative subjectivity in the post-Soviet Russian context, and to identify how this subjectivity can preserve and reinforce Russia’s cultural and civilizational identity amid globalization and ideological confrontation. The study adopts a philosophical-anthropological perspective, grounded in historical-logical analysis and comparative methodology. It reflects on Russia's dual position as both a unique civilization and a part of global structures. The author analyzes ideological shifts since the Soviet collapse, incorporating cultural, political, and ethical dimensions of subject formation. This work addresses a rarely studied nexus between national identity, cultural continuity, and individual subjectivity within Russia's post-Soviet transformation. It emphasizes the need for an authentic, culturally-rooted subject capable of countering externally imposed models and resisting pseudo-subjectivity shaped by media and liberal globalization. The idealized post-Soviet “New Russian” subject proved incompatible with Russia’s civilizational code, based on community, solidarity, and cultural rootedness. The failure of liberal individualism led to social disorientation, asocial behavior, and ideological vacuum. The reassertion of patriotic subjectivity, supported by policy changes and cultural education reforms, is presented as essential to restoring national coherence and agency. The paper introduces the concept of “transformative subjectivity” as an anthropological and civilizational tool for navigating modern Russian identity. It contributes to political anthropology, national ideology studies, and cultural sociology by offering a multidimensional framework for understanding subject formation in transitional societies.

References

Augustine, A. (1998). Works. Vol. 1. On true religion. St. Petersburg; Kiev: UTSIMM-press, pp. 394-468.

Berdyaev, N. A. (1939). On man's slavery and freedom: Experience of personalistic philosophy. Paris: YMCA-Press, pp. 51, 66-70.

Camus, A. (1998). Rebellious man: Collection. Trans. from French. Moscow: AST.

Constitution of the Russian Federation. (2004). Chapter I: Foundations of the constitutional system. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, pp. 2-7.

Engels, F. (1989). Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. Moscow: Politizdat.

Hayek, R. (1984). Speech in Hamburg. Available at: https://vk.com/wall-186479931_156?ysclid=m0f2yvs4b9451496736

Herzen, A. I. (1960). Letter on freedom of will. In Collected works: in 30 volumes (Vol. 20, Book 1, pp. 439-443). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.

In the ‘SWO’ - disappointed! Russians agree on the defeat of the RF. (n.d.). Available at: https://ya.ru/video/preview/6064205175797138252

Kant, I. (1980). Religion within the limits of reason alone. In Tractates and letters (pp. 78-278). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo 'Nauka'.

Lenin, V. I. (1990). On the significance of militant materialism. In P. A. Alekseev (Ed.), On fracture: Philosophical discussions of the twenties: Philosophy and ideology (pp. 30-37). Moscow: Politizdat.

Mokhov, A., Svirin, Y., Shestov, S., Pеkshev A., & Artyukhov, E. (2025). Public and Private Law Means of Ensuring Economic Security in Russia. Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence , 15(00), e0525. https://doi.org/10.37497/eagleSustainable.v15i.525

Navasardova, E., Burkin, D., Nutrikhin, R., Svidlova, K., & Chilingaryan, R. (2025).

The weakening of protected areas: An analysis of enforcement gaps and ecological risks in Russia. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES), 15(5), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.31407/ijees15.521

Nietzsche, F. (1990). Human, too human: A book for free minds. Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdvo "Mysl", pp. 231-490.

Perevezentsev, S. V. (2001). The doctrine of Protagoras in the presentation of Diogenes of Laertes. In Anthology of ancient philosophy (pp. 67-70). Moscow: OLMA-PRESS.

Pugacheva, A. (n.d). Were villeins, became slaves. Available at: https://ya.ru/video/preview/11145675625807897599

Putin, V. (2005). Message of the President of Russia of April 25, 2005 to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/36354

Rambler. (2023, March 10). Poverty level in Russia fell to the lowest level since the early 90s. Available at: https://news.rambler.ru/sociology/50351987-rosstat-uroven-bednosti-v-rf-upal-do-minimalnogo-znacheniya-s-nachala-90-h/

Safiullin, M., Elshin, L., & Kuznetsov, Y. (2025). Fintech Integration And The Prospective Role Of Islamic Finance In Shaping Regional Investment Dynamics In The Russian Federation. Universidad Y Sociedad, 17(6), e5529. Retrieved from https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/5529

Solovyov, V. S. (1989). Readings on God-manhood. In Works: in 2 volumes (Vol. 2, pp. 7-8). Moscow: Pravda.

Weber, M. (2002). Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism. Trans. from German. Ivano-Frankivsk: East View.

Yeltsin, B. (1994). Message of the President of Russia of February 24, 1994 to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://rulaws.ru/president/Poslanie-Prezidenta-RF-Federalnomu-Sobraniyu-ot-24.02.1994

Yeltsin, B. (1995). Message of the President of Russia of February 16, 1995 to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/7521

Zinoviev, A. A. (1991). Homo sovieticus: Para bellum. Moscow: Moskovskiy Rabochiy.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11

How to Cite

Khaziev, M., Khaziev, A., Serebryakov, F., Ibragimova, Z., & Uboitseva, E. (2026). SOCIALLY TRANSFORMATIVE SUBJECTIVITY IN THE POST-SOVIET RUSSIAN SPACE: ANTHROPOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234832. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4832