FROM PHYSICAL VIOLENCE TO DIGITAL POLARIZATION: RECONSTRUCTING LEGAL RESPONSES TO HYBRID SOCIAL CONFLICTS IN POST-REFORM INDONESIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6407

Keywords:

Hybrid Social Conflict, Digital Polarization, Legal Reconstruction, Post-Reform Indonesia, Socio-Legal Study

Abstract

Indonesia is entering a critical phase in its transition to a digitally integrated economy, yet its existing legal frameworks remain inadequate to address the structural The landscape of social conflict in post-reform Indonesia has undergone a fundamental shift, migrating from localized physical violence to systemic digital polarization. While the state has established various legal frameworks to manage social unrest, these instruments predominantly address conventional physical manifestations, often failing to mitigate the complexities of "hybrid social conflicts." This study identifies a significant legal lacuna: current regulations, such as the Law on Social Conflict Management and the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, operate in silos. They focus either on physical security or individual cyber-crimes, neglecting the symbiotic relationship where digital narratives fuel physical escalation and vice-versa, leading to a fragmented and often repressive state response. Method using a socio-legal approach and normative legal analysis, this research examines recent case studies of hybrid conflicts in Indonesia. It evaluates the efficacy of existing legal mechanisms through the lens of restorative justice and democratic resilience. The findings reveal that the current punitive-centric legal response inadvertently exacerbates polarization by criminalizing dissent rather than addressing the root causes of digital-physical hybridity. Therefore, this study proposes a "Reconstructed Legal Response" framework that integrates digital literacy mandates, multi-stakeholder mediation platforms, and a revised hierarchy of social conflict intervention that prioritizes de-escalation over incarceration. This research contributes to the global discourse on the "Global South’s" legal adaptation to digital disruption. It argues for a transition from a reactive-punitive paradigm to a proactive-integrative legal framework to safeguard social cohesion in the age of digital volatility.

References

Adam, A. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Penentuan Locus Delicti Dalam Penyidikan Kejahatan Siber (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).

Al-Ulamai, U. A., Arsyadani, A. N., Wati, B. E., & Harahap, R. D. K. A. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Versus Keamanan Negara: Analisis Tindakan Represif Aparat dalam menangani Demonstrasi Penolakan Kenaikan Tunjangan DPR (25-31 Agustus 2025). JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM, 19(01), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1404

Djatmiko, W. P. (2022). Budaya hukum: Dalam masyarakat pluralistik. Penerbit Thafa Media.

Fuzain, N. A. (2023). Konflik sengketa lahan antara masyarakat adat rempang dengan bp batam terhadap pembangunan Rempang Eco City. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(11), 1081-1088. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i11.798

Hendra, S. (2025). konflik petani kelapa sawit plasma dengan pt. karya canggih mandiri utama (pt. kcmu) di pekon marang kecamatan pesisir selatan kabupaten pesisir barat (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).

Indraswara, D. (2025). Rekonstruksi Metodologis Hukum: Diversifikasi dan Integrasi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Doktrinal), Empiris (Non-Doktrinal), dan Studi Sosio-Legal: Legal Methodological Reconstruction: Diversification and Integration of Normative (Doctrinal), Empirical (Non-Doctrinal), and Socio-Legal Research. IPMHI Law Journal, 5(2), 205-246. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v5i2.41599

Kadir, Z. K. (2025). Populisme Punitif dan Erosi Nilai-Nilai Hukum: Mengupas Kebijakan Kriminal di Tengah Polarisasi Sosial. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(4), 264-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.5241

Lim, Merlyna (2014) "Klik yang Tak Memantik: Aktivisme Media Sosial di Indonesia," JURNAL KOMUNIKASI INDONESIA: Vol. 3: No. 1, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v3i1.7846

Marpaung, H. W., & Sazali, H. (2025). Multitafsir UU ITE Sebagai Koridor Hukum: Studi Pada Intensitas User Conflicts di Media Sosial. Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 6(2), 1439-1450. https://doi.org/10.63447/jimik.v6i2.1438

Mulyana, D. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi Di Dalam Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 177-198.

Muryanti, M. A. (2020). Sosiologi Hukum dan Kriminal. Laboratorium Sosiologi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.

Ningrat, S. R. C., & Nulhaqim, S. A. (2023). Pasal Karet UU ITE dan Peyelesaian Konflik Digital di Indonesia. Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science, 4(2), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v4i2.158

Nurjaman, A., Damanik, F. H. S., Mirsel, R., Camerling, L. Y., Wahjudin, L., Nur, A. M., ... & Ledyawati, L. (2025). Konflik sosial dan resolusi konflik: Kajian sosiologi perspektif pendidikan, ekonomi, dan hukum. Star Digital Publishing.

Nurjaman, A., Damanik, F. H. S., Mirsel, R., Camerling, L. Y., Wahjudin, L., Nur, A. M., ... & Ledyawati, L. (2025). Konflik sosial dan resolusi konflik: Kajian sosiologi perspektif pendidikan, ekonomi, dan hukum. Star Digital Publishing.

Prasetyo Wibowo, D., & Sudarto. (2025). Akibat Hukum Bagi Pelaku Penyebaran Informasi Palsu (Hoax) Berdasarkan Uu Ite. LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.08221/lexlaguens.v3i1.96

Pratama, M. D. (2024). Dinamika Hubungan Antara Nilai Sosial Dan Penegakan Hukum Di Era Digital. Legal System Journal, 1(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.70656/lsj.v1i1.312

Prayatna, W. (2025). Teknologi Big Data: Revolusi Digital Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Deepublish.

Pudjilianto, B., & Handayani, E. (2022). Penerapan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Diponegoro Law Journal, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2022.34957

Rochim, B. (2020). Pengamanan Obyek Vital Nasional Di Kawasan Industri Batamindo Kota Batam. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 5(1), 20-47.

Rocky Marbun, S. H. Kapita selekta penegakan hukum (acara) pidana mengungkap aspek ideologis (kepentingan) dalam interpretasi hukum sebagai truth-games. Publica Indonesia Utama.

Rudi Margono, S. H. (2026). Paradigma Restoratif-Ketika Keadilan Tidak Harus Menghukum. Yayasan Putra Adi Dharma.

Santoso, A., & Sari, D. K. (2021). Penularan Emosional (Emotional Contangion) Kajian Literatur dan Rekomendasi. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam, 11(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.29080/jbki.2021.11.2.278-289

Sukmana, O., Sulistyaningsih, T., Damanik, F. H. S., Wahyudi, F. D., Ras, A., Astari, F., ... & Fauziyah, N. K. (2025). Sosiologi Digital: Transformasi Sosial di Era Teknologi. Star Digital Publishing

Suyanto, B. (2020). Memahami Teori Sosial. Airlangga University Press.

Suyono, S. (2022). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Sebagai Kebijakan Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Hukum Melalui Musyawarah Mufakat Berbasis Nilai Keadilan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Syafrita, W. K. E., Widiasari, Z., Putra, P., Kom, S., Veri, J., & Kom, S. (2025). Tantangan Dan Masa Depan Komputasi Sosial. Fahmi Karya.

Syarief, E. (2025). Teknologi dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Keadaan Darurat Di Indonesia. Global Review of Law and Human Rights, 1(1), 49-64.

Tobing, N., Adolf, H., Rompis, A., & Pujiyanto, R. (2025). Platform Sovereignty And Legal Reform In Indonesia: Aligning With Global For A Digital Future. Veredas Do Direito, 22, e223384. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n3.3384

Tonui, F. C. (2025). Bottom-up peacebuilding in Action: Institutionalization of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanisms.

White, A. (2016). Manuel Castells’s trilogy the information age: economy, society, and culture. Information, Communication & Society, 19(12), 1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1151066

Yusuf DM, M., Saragih, G., Setiawan, F., Sitompul, H., & Berson, H. (2025). Analisis Faktor Penghambat Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Lawrence Friedman. JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI, 13(2), 711-725. doi:https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6369

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Sriyanti, Sukmariningsih, R. M., Karyono, H., & Pujiyanto, R. (2026). FROM PHYSICAL VIOLENCE TO DIGITAL POLARIZATION: RECONSTRUCTING LEGAL RESPONSES TO HYBRID SOCIAL CONFLICTS IN POST-REFORM INDONESIA. Veredas Do Direito, 23(8), e236407. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6407