INCOME INEQUALITY IN TURKEY: STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6204Palavras-chave:
Income Inequality, Turkey, Income Distribution, Social Policy, Economic Inequality, Institutional FactorsResumo
This study examines the structural dynamics of income inequality in Turkey within a multidimensional and institutional framework. While the reform process of the early 2000s led to a relative improvement in income distribution, this trend has reversed since the mid-2010s, giving way to a renewed pattern of deterioration. The study argues that rising inflation, exchange rate shocks, declining real wages, informality in labor markets, and regional disparities, combined with limited redistributive capacity of social policies, have reinforced income inequality in Turkey. Methodologically, the paper employs a descriptive and comparative approach based on secondary data obtained from internationally recognized sources such as the OECD, World Bank, IMF, and national statistics. Standard indicators, including the Gini coefficient and income distribution measures, are used to analyze both cross-country differences and temporal changes. The findings suggest that income inequality in Turkey reflects a structural model shaped by the interaction between market-generated disparities and insufficient redistributive mechanisms. Moreover, the results highlight that inequality is not merely an economic issue but also a critical factor affecting social cohesion, institutional trust, and long-term development prospects. The study contributes to the literature by integrating economic, institutional, and social dimensions of inequality into a unified analytical framework. In this context, it proposes a set of policy recommendations focusing on progressive taxation, strengthened social protection systems, labor market reforms, regional development strategies, and human capital investments.
Referências
Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.)
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Buğra, A., & Keyder, Ç. (2006). The Turkish welfare regime in transformation. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 211–228.
Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.
Credit Suisse. (2022). Global wealth report.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
European Commission. (2023). Income inequality in the EU report.
Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.
International Labour Organization. (2022). Global wage report.
International Monetary Fund. (2023). Inequality and macroeconomic stability report.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. MIT Press.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. Duckworth.
OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2022a). Income inequality database. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IDD
OECD. (2022b). Income inequality indicators. https://www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ketterer, T. D. (2020). Institutional change and the development of lagging regions. Regional Studies, 54(7), 974–986.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. W. W. Norton & Company.
TEPAV. (2021). Report on regional and multidimensional poverty in Turkey.
TÜİK. (2023). Regional income statistics.
TÜİK. (2023). Regional statistics.
TÜİK. (2023). Income and living conditions survey.
UNDP. (2022). Turkey human development report.
World Bank. (2021a). Social assistance and redistribution in Turkey.
World Bank. (2021b). Turkey regional development report.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0


