LEGAL POLICY, ETHICAL COMPLIANCE, AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LECTURER CODE OF ETHICS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF RIAU, INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6018Palavras-chave:
Legal Policy, Ethical Compliance, Code of Ethics, Lecturer, University of RiauResumo
The lecturer code of ethics is a normative instrument designed to uphold integrity, professionalism, and accountability among educators in the implementation of the tridharma of higher education. The University of Riau has issued Rector Regulation Number 6 of 2017 concerning the Lecturer Code of Ethics as the legal foundation governing professional behavior; however, the dynamic development of higher education regulations and the evolution of academic culture necessitate an evaluation of its implementation effectiveness. This legal research aims to analyze the legal framework underlying the formulation of the lecturer code of ethics and to assess its implementation within the University of Riau. The study employs a mixed-method approach that integrates a doctrinal analysis of legal policy documents with empirical methods, including interviews, focus group discussions, and surveys involving university stakeholders. The findings indicate that the implementation of the lecturer code of ethics has not been optimal due to regulatory, institutional, infrastructural, and academic cultural constraints. Moreover, lecturers’ understanding of the code’s substantive provisions varies, and enforcement mechanisms remain inconsistent. This research recommends updating the legal policy to align with developments in higher education governance, strengthening ethical institutions, and developing a more participatory and ethically-oriented model of implementation. The implications of this study are significant for ensuring that academic ethical governance operates effectively and in accordance with the principles of institutional accountability and integrity.
Referências
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO.
Anwar, M., & Surya, S. (2019). Peran perguruan tinggi dalam kolaborasi lintas sektor untuk pengembangan masyarakat. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.2019.32.123
Arifin, Z., & Frmanzah, F. (2021). Analisis kebijakan triple helix dalam mendorong inovasi daerah: Studi kasus di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(1), 41–58.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Berry, M. F. (2021). Pembentukan teori peraturan perundang-undangan. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 2(2), 87–91.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Diana, D., & Hakim, L. (2021). Strategi kolaborasi antara perguruan tinggi, industri dan pemerintah: Tinjauan konseptual dalam upaya meningkatkan inovasi pendidikan dan kreativitas pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 1(1).
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis. Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Evan, W. M. (1965). Law and sociology: Exploratory essays. Free Press.
Ferrara, L. (2024). Ethical principles. In Ethical reasoning in forensic science (pp. 5–13). Springer.
Forchtner, B. (2021). Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): The discourse-historical approach in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 314–331.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Hafids, J. (2018). Karakteristik kebijakan pendidikan tinggi hukum Indonesia berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Kertha Wicaksana, 12(1), 22–37.
Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299882
Hartono, S. (1988). Asas-asas hukum dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Majalah BPHN, (2).
Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development. Institute for Development Policy and Management.
Hidayat, D., Putro, U. S., & Nazim, A. (2020). Peran kebijakan pemerintah dalam mendorong inovasi melalui kerja sama perguruan tinggi dan industri. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 8(2), 1–15.
Humboldt University of Berlin. (2021). Regulations on safeguarding good scientific practice. https://www.hu-berlin.de
Kant, I. (2020). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. In Immanuel Kant (pp. 17–98). Routledge.
Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Russell & Russell.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024. Kementerian Keuangan.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kusumastuti, R., & Purwanto, E. (2018). Pengembangan model kerja sama perguruan tinggi, industri, dan pemerintah: Perspektif manajemen pengetahuan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 20(2), 145–156.
Lubis, M. S. (1994). Filsafat ilmu dan penelitian. Mandar Maju.
Mahfud, M. D. (2014). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Manan, B. (1995). Pertumbuhan dan perkembangan konstitusi suatu negara. Mandar Maju.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Prenada Media.
Morshidi, S. (2010). Strategic planning directions of Malaysia's higher education: University autonomy in the midst of political uncertainties. Higher Education, 59(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9259-0
Moulin, D. (2024). Reading the Nicomachean Ethics with Goffman. Journal of Moral Education, 53(4), 662–676.
Nasution, B. J. (1991). Teknik dan cara pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan negara. Tarsito.
National University of Singapore. (2020). NUS staff code of conduct. https://nus.edu.sg
Nurtjahjo, H. (2006). Filsafat demokrasi. Bumi Aksara.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford University. (2022). Academic integrity in teaching and research. https://www.ox.ac.uk
Parsons, W. (2005). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Perkmann, M., Neely, A., & Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university–industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00637.x
Prasetyo, P. E., & Kistanti, N. R. (2020). Penguatan ekosistem inovasi untuk peningkatan daya saing daerah di era industri 4.0. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 20(2), 179–192.
Rahman, A., & Maulana, M. F. R. (2023). Analisis kritis terhadap pemikiran utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham dalam perspektif etika dan filsafat manusia. Journal of Society and Development, 3(2), 53–64.
Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017). University–industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62–63, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.003
Rasli, A. M., Norhalim, N., & Kowang, T. O. (2015). Factors affecting university–industry collaboration performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.384
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
Rully, M., Sokibi, P., & Adam, R. (2020). Rancang bangun sistem informasi pengelolaan arsip data kerja sama tri dharma perguruan tinggi menggunakan metode alphabetical filing system. Jurnal Petik, 6(2), 34–44.
Senjaya, A. J. (2018). Tinjauan kritis terhadap istilah metode campuran (mixed method) dalam riset sosial. Risâlah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 4(1), 103–118.
Sinaga, B. N. P. D. (2005). Ilmu pengetahuan perundang-undangan. UII Press.
Siregar, N. F. (2018). Efektivitas hukum. Al-Razi, 18(2).
Siswanto, J., & Firmansyah, A. (2018). Strategi penguatan kemitraan perguruan tinggi dan industri untuk meningkatkan daya saing bangsa. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 17(3), 186–196.
Soehino. (2006). Hukum tata negara: Teknik perundang-undangan. BPFE.
Soekanto, S. (1975). Beberapa permasalahan hukum dalam kerangka pembangunan di Indonesia. UI Press.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.
Soeprapto, F. I. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan 1: Jenis, fungsi dan materi muatan. Kanisius.
Suandi, I. W. (2013). Eksistensi kebijakan publik dan hukum dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Udayana.
Sumargono, M. (1997). Pedoman pembuatan usulan penelitian: Sebuah panduan dasar. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sunggono, B. (1996). Metode penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sunusi, S., & Sunusi, M. S. (2023). Kebijakan dan inovasi pendidikan perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Venus, 11(2), 127–135.
Supriyadi, E., & Nurlaila, S. (2019). Tantangan dan peluang kemitraan perguruan tinggi dengan industri dalam menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(2), 132–146.
Suryani, A., & Widyastuti, R. (2020). Peningkatan kerja sama industri dan perguruan tinggi: Kajian strategis di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.26418/jmip.v11i1.393
Tierney, W. G., & Lechuga, V. (2022). Ethics and the academic profession. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 45(3), 221–239.
University of Tokyo. (2021). UTokyo code of conduct. https://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Usman, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar sosiologi. Pustaka Belajar.
Wahyuni, T., & Permadi, R. N. (2018). Penguatan kode etik organisasi dalam mewujudkan netralitas ASN. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(2), 151–162.
Wang, Q., Li, Y., Yang, Y., Little, M. G., Basnight, E. B., & Fryberger, C. B. (2024). University-led entrepreneurship ecosystem building in underserved communities: From a network perspective. Geographical Review, 114(3), 353–377.
Wibowo, A., & Sari, D. K. (2019). Model pengabdian masyarakat berbasis kolaborasi multipihak: Studi kasus program desa binaan di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 120–135.
Wibowo, M. (2016). Menakar konstitusionalitas sebuah kebijakan hukum terbuka dalam pengujian undang-undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2).
Yuliandri. (2009). Asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang baik: Gagasan pembentukan undang-undang yang berkelanjutan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
