PROSECUTORIAL INDEPENDENCE: COMPARATIVE MODELS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5923Palavras-chave:
Prosecutorial Independence, Rule off Law, People’s Procuracy, Comparative Criminal Justice, Constitutional Law, VietnamResumo
The independence of prosecutorial institutions is widely recognized as a fundamental component of rule-of-law systems. In contemporary constitutional democracies, prosecutors play a role in ensuring the legality of criminal proceedings, safeguarding human rights, and maintaining public confidence in the justice system. This article examines the guarantees of prosecutorial independence in rule-of-law states through a comparative analysis of five jurisdictions: France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam. Based on these comparative insights, the article discusses the challenges facing the prosecutorial system in Vietnam and proposes directions for improving the institutional framework governing the independence of the People’s Procuracy. The findings suggest that strengthening prosecutorial independence must be accompanied by effective mechanisms of accountability and constitutional control to ensure both the integrity of criminal justice and the protection of human rights. Ultimately, the article contributes to the discourse on judicial reforms and the development of the socialist rule-of-law state in Vietnam.
Referências
ACKERMAN, Bruce. The New Separation of Powers. Cambridge, MA, 2000.
ASHWORTH, Andrew. Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure. 2002. ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002.
Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom. , 28 jun. 1984. Disponível em: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2026
DAMAŠKA, Mirjan R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.
DAVID T. JOHNSON. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. v. 31
DUNG, Nguyen Dang. The Constitution and the Control of State Power. Hanoi: [S.n.].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION). Report on European Standards as Regards the Independence of the Judicial System: Part II – The Prosecution Service. [S.l.]: Council of Europe, 2010.
HODGSON, Jacqueline. French Criminal Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
LANGER, Máximo; SKLANSKY, David Alan. Prosecutors and Democracy. In: Oxford Handbook of Prosecutors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Law on Organization of the People’s Procuracy (2014), amended and supplemented in 2025. , [S.d.]. Disponível em: <https://datafiles.chinhphu.vn/cpp/files/vbpq/2025/7/82-qh.signed.pdf>. Acesso em: 23 out. 2025
Medvedyev and Others v. France. , 2010.
UNITED NATIONS. Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors. United Nations: [S.n.]. Disponível em: <https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/guidelines-role-prosecutors>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2026.
UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME. The Status and Role of Prosecutors. 2014.
Vasilescu v. Romania. , 1998.
VIETNAM. Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (2013), as amended and supplemented in 2025. Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam, 2025.
WEIGEND, Thomas. Germany. In: The Prosecution Service in Europe: A Comparative Study. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0


