EXPLORING PROSECUTORIAL MEDIATION AUTHORITY IN GOVERNMENT DISPUTES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5912Palavras-chave:
Government Disputes, Mediation, Prosecutor’s OfficeResumo
O Ministério Público ocupa uma posição estratégica no sistema jurídico indonésio, não apenas como órgão de acusação, mas também como representante do Estado nas esferas civil e administrativa. No entanto, a autoridade do Ministério Público como mediador na resolução de disputas envolvendo o governo ainda raramente recebe atenção acadêmica ou pública. Isso cria uma lacuna na compreensão do papel alternativo do Ministério Público no apoio à concretização da segurança jurídica, da justiça e da utilidade. Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar a autoridade do Ministério Público como mediador de disputas governamentais por meio de uma abordagem comparativa entre sistemas jurídicos, examinando as práticas na Indonésia, Austrália e Cingapura. O método utilizado é a pesquisa qualitativa com análise comparativa, utilizando instrumentos jurídicos nacionais e internacionais e literatura acadêmica. Os resultados do estudo mostram que existem variações significativas na regulamentação da autoridade das instituições de Ministério Público entre os países, especialmente no que diz respeito à capacidade de mediação e às funções quase judiciais. Na Indonésia, as autoridades ainda enfrentam limitações normativas e práticas, enquanto a Austrália, por meio do GMS, enfatiza o profissionalismo com mecanismos de prestação de contas, e Cingapura, por meio do AGC, conseguiu integrar as funções de assessoria jurídica e acusação, mantendo a independência. Essas conclusões afirmam a importância de fortalecer a autoridade dos promotores como mediadores por meio de um marco jurídico claro e de práticas institucionais profissionais, a fim de realizar uma resolução de disputas eficiente, justa e íntegra.
Referências
Abdusalimovich, M. A. (2024). The Role of the Prosecutor’S Office in the System of State Power. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 6(12), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue12-08
Akbar, N., Rapung, R., & Awal Rifai. (2024). Perspektif Fikih Islam Terkait Ṣulḥ Fuḍūlī dalam Proses Perdamaian Pihak Bersengketa. AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1661
Akhter, S., Mahr, F., & Imtiaz, A. (2023). Exploring Restorative Justice: An Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Islamic Law and Customary Law. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.05.04.625636
Anggraeni, H. Y., Sagita, P. I., Yusmana, F. V., Reza, M., Sehafudin, S., & Johan, W. (2025). Penerapan ADR dan Potensi Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(1), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i1.1267
Arrahim, F., Marjon, D., Syam, M., & Fauzan, R. (2023). The Role of State Attorney in Prosecutor’s Office of An Effort to Protect State Assets. Andalas Law Journal, 8(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.25077/alj.v8i2.56
Bandera, S., Cattaneo, M. C., Galanti, M. T., & Lippi, A. (2024). Advising the prince: The pluralization of the internal policy advisory system in Italy (2019-2021). Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 54(3), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2024.8
Brölmann, C. M., Lefeber, R., & Zieck, M. Y. A. (2023). PEOPLES AND MINORITIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. In Peoples and Minorities in International Law. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004641990
CSA Teddy Lesmana. (2019). Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i1.1
Dinata, S. (2025). Reconstruction of Foreign Investment Dispute Settlement in Indonesia. Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v5i1.30617
ELLEN RYGITA A. PUTRI. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Non Litigasi Terhadap Permasalahan Bpjs Kesehatan Pekanbaru Di Bidang Perdata Yang Dilakukan Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Pada Kejaksaan Tinggi Riau.
Firdausi, N. I. (2020). HAK WARGA NEGARA DALAM PENGADUAN KONSTITUSIONAL (CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT) PERSPEKTIF FIQIH SIYASAH DAN HUKUM TATA NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA (Vol. 8).
Freddy, S. P., & Mohamad, N. A. (2024). DISPUTE IN CROSS-BORDER WAQF: MITIGATION, RESOLUTION, AND THE ROLE OF WAQF AUTHORITY. IIUM Law Journal, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.905
Gallo, D., Mastroianni, R., Nicola, F. G., & Cecchetti, L. (2024). The Italian influence on European law: Judges and advocates general (1952-2000). In The Italian Influence on European Law: Judges and Advocates General (1952-2000).
Hartawan, I. E., Handayani, P., & Bhakti, R. T. A. (2024). Legal Foundations and Implications of Civil Deeds of Settlement in the Indonesian Legal System. Lex Publica, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.11.1.2024.210
Hasan, S. (2023). Public Policy in the Muslim Majority Countries: A Discussion for Public Interest. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333864
Hofmann, R. (2021). Formalism versus pragmatism – A comparative legal and empirical analysis of the German and Dutch criminal justice systems with regard to effectiveness and efficiency. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28(4), 452–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211005983
Holvast, N. L., & Lindeman, J. M. W. (2020). An inquiry into the blurring boundaries between professionals and paraprofessionals in Dutch courts and the public prosecution service. International Journal of Law in Context, 16(4), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000270
Jacometti, V. (2020). Climate Change Litigation: Global Trends and Critical Issues in the Light of the Urgenda 2018 Decision and the IPCC Special Report “global Warming of 1.5°C.” Global Jurist, Vol. 20. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0005
Lanau, S., Esposito, G., & Pompe, S. (2021). Judicial System Reform in Italy: A Key to Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407525
Lupo, N., & Tucciarelli, C. (2023). The advisory functions of the Italian Council of State. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 43(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2023.2169411
Mateo Totić, E. (2024). the Role of the Public Prosecutor’S Office Within Criminal Proceedings. SCIENCE International Journal, 3(4), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0304067t
Matteucci, G. (2024). Civil Process and Mediation in Italy, 2024. Beijing Law Review, 15(03), 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.153080
Matteucci, G. (2025). Mandatory Mediation, the Italian Experience, a Case Study—2025. Beijing Law Review, 16(01), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.161017
Maula, B. S. (2023). The Concept of Ṣulḥ and Mediation in Marriage Conflict Resolution in Religious Courts: A Comparative Study between Contemporary Indonesian Family Law and Classical Islamic Law. El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v2i1.7777
MELENKO, O. (2021). Mediation as an Alternative Form of Dispute Resolution: Comparative-Legal Analysis. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/126
Mumpuni, R., Wahyuningsih, S. E., Soponyono, E., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2024). Challenges of State Attorney’s Authority in Handling Civil and State Administrative Cases in Indonesia. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(12), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2024.v09i12.005
Nalle, V. I. W. (2018). Hasanuddin LawReview. HasanuddinLawReview, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v4i1.1316
Ningsih, R. K., & Tuasikal, H. (2025). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Implementasi Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Challenges and Solutions in the Implementation of Mediation as an Alternative for Land Dispute Resolution. Journal of Dual Legal Systems, 2(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.58824/jdls.v2i1.323
Noho, M. D. H., & Lumbanraja, A. D. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Public Private Partnership (PPP) Melalui Lembaga Penyelesaian Perselisihan Independen Di Indonesia. CREPIDO, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.5.2.146-160
Pieris, J., Nugroho, W., & Ryantoni, H. (2025). Explore The Values Of Pancasila As The Basic Philosophy Of The Indonesian Nation (Vol. 18). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01801.6
Prapmasari, D., & Nugraheni, D. (2025). Kewenangan Jaksa Pengacara Negara (JPN) Sebagai Mediator Dalam Menentukan Nilai Ganti Kerugian Pembangunan Jalan Tol Solo-Yogya Ditinjau Dari Asas Keadilan. Tunas Agraria, 8(3), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i3.491
Prihandana, R., Satrio, T., & Murthi, W. (2023). Wewenang Jaksa di Bidang Keperdataan Berdasarkan Pasal 30 Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Halu Oleo Law Review, 7(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v7i1.16
Romualdi, G. (2018). Problem-Solving Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Italian Legal Context. Utrecht Law Review, 14(3), 53–63. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.468
Rosalina, F. R. (2024). Efektivitas Pengadilan Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Journal of Legal Sustainability, 1(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.69693/jols.v1i1.28
Rostovska, K. V., Hryshyna, N. V., Kaidash, O. Y., & Syromiatnikova, M. S. (2021). The Mediation as a means to resolve administrative disputes: An appraisal of the historical and legal aspects. DIXI (Bogotá, Colombia), 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2021.01.11
Saputra, D., Surya Perdana, A., & Murbawan, H. (2022). Peran Jaksa dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia The Role of Prosecutors in the Justice System in Indonesia. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.7
Sasongko, A., Abdul Madjid, Yuliati, & Fachrizal Afandi. (2025). The Implementation Of Other Legal Measures By State Attorneys To Recover State Finances. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 5(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i1.38951
Serhieieva, A. (2024). Role of state in developing mediation – In EU and Ukraine (a comparative perspective). Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, 6(12), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i12.ART01.UKR
Suadi, A. (2018). Preference of Non-litigation Procedures through Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes. Lex Publica, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.5.2.2018.1-12
Sutrisno, A. (2024). Analysis of state administrative court procedural law: A recent review and its practical implications. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(8), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i8.870
Suud, A. K. (2020). Optimization Of The Role Of Asset Recovery Center (Ppa) Of The Attorney-General’s Office Of The Republic Of Indonesia In Asset Recovery Of Corruption Crime Results. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 9(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.9.2.2020.211-231
Ullah, M. A., Ullah, M. U., & Ullah, M. I. (2025). Islamic Political Thought: Relevance of Classical Ideals in Contemporary Governance. Journal of Religion and Society, 3(02).
Windradi, F., Bramantyo, R. Y., Widayati, S. C., & Putra, R. A. (2022). KEDUDUKAN DAN PERAN HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA INTERNATIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL. Transparansi Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v5i2.3062
Yusna Wulan Sari. (2025). PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF MEDIASI DALAM RUANG LINGKUP PERADILAN AGAMA DAN PERADILAN NEGERI. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11281
Zhyvko, M., Dombrovska, A., & Kiblyk, D. (2025). THE ROLE OF OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS IN ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. Public Administration and Law Review, 21(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36690/2674- 5216-2025-1-87-98 Received:
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
