BRIDGING ACADEMIA AND INDUSTRY: COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION STRATEGIES IN CHINESE UNIVERSITY-ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5879Palavras-chave:
University-Enterprise Partnerships, Collaborative Innovation Strategies, Synergistic Effects, Higher Education Reform, Innovation EcosystemsResumo
Background: China’s pursuit of technological self-reliance and global competitiveness has intensified the need for academia-industry collaboration. As higher education evolves to meet modern economic demands, universities and enterprises face systemic challenges. Against this backdrop, the study situates itself in China’s broader agenda to leverage synergistic innovation as a catalyst for economic and educational transformation. Objective: This research investigates how collaborative innovation strategies between universities and industries in China can bridge institutional divides to foster technological advancement and talent development. It seeks to identify mechanisms that align academic reforms with industry needs. Method: This study employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to address its objectives. Based on empirical data and the resources available in universities in Hainan Province, the target sample size has been set at 509.For the qualitative aspect of the research, 15 interviewees were selected using purposive and convenience sampling methods, with interviews conducted between September and December 2024. Findings: The findings reveal how interdisciplinary collaboration, government-industry-academia policy alignment, and digital platforms act as critical enablers of synergistic innovation, underscoring the necessity of multi-stakeholder engagement to strengthen China’s innovation ecosystem, arguing that university-enterprise collaboration is not merely a driver of economic growth but a transformative force reshaping higher education’s societal role.
Referências
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Institutional innovation and the creation of new organizational forms: A conceptual framework. [Nome do periódico e demais dados não identificados]
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown.
Eitan, M., & Renana, P. (2018). The effect of social networks structure on innovation performance: A review and directions for research. [Nome do periódico e demais dados não identificados], 34–56.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Institutional innovation: Novel, creative, and adaptive features. [Nome do periódico e demais dados não identificados]
Haken, H. (1971). Synergetics: An introduction. Springer.
Huang, H., & Ma, Y. (2017). Characteristics of knowledge, people engaged in knowledge transfer and knowledge stickiness: Evidence from Chinese R&D team. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1559–1579.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.
Jones, C., & Pykett, J. (2012). Defining institutional innovation: A systematic review and synthesis of the literature. [Nome do periódico e demais dados não identificados]
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press.
Mowery, D. C. (2017). Collaborative innovation: A review of the literature and implications for public policy. California Management Review, 59(1), 64–89.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese firms create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.
Tohidi, H., Seyedaliakbar, S. M., & Mandegari, M. (2012). Organizational learning measurement and the effect on firm innovation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25(3), 219–245.
Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). Cambridge University Press.
Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Institutional innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. [Nome do periódico e demais dados não identificados]
Zhang, H. (2016). Research on synergy innovation of university-industry cooperation organizations [Doctoral dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology].
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
