GOVERNING RESEARCH COLLABORATION AND KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5806Palavras-chave:
Research Collaboration, Higher Education, Bibliometric Analysis, Co-Authorship, Co-Citation, Keyword Co-Occurrence, Knowledge NetworksResumo
In recent years, research collaboration has increasingly emerged as a key mechanism shaping knowledge production within higher education systems, particularly under conditions influenced by globalization and digital transformation. Despite this growing attention, the existing literature remains somewhat fragmented, often providing only partial insights into how collaboration networks evolve and how knowledge structures are formed. From this perspective, a more integrated and systematic examination appears necessary. Building on this premise, the present study adopts a bibliometric approach to explore the development of research collaboration in higher education. The analysis is based on 1,883 publications indexed in Scopus over the period 2015–2025. A combination of techniques is employed, including descriptive statistics, co-authorship and co-citation analyses, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic mapping, allowing for a multi-dimensional understanding of collaboration patterns and intellectual structures. The findings indicate a noticeable acceleration in research output, particularly after 2020, alongside a highly interconnected yet uneven global collaboration network dominated by countries such as the United States and China. At the author level, collaboration tends to concentrate within a limited number of core groups, while many scholars remain at the periphery. In addition, the field draws on diverse intellectual streams, and thematic analyses reveal emerging research directions, although several areas remain underexplored. Taken together, these findings provide a more comprehensive mapping of research collaboration in higher education. Beyond offering a structured overview, the study also generates policy-relevant insights for higher education governance, particularly in fostering more inclusive and sustainable collaboration networks.
Referências
Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars. Scientometrics, 88, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?. Higher education, 57(2), 155-171.
Adams, J. (2012). Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a
Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Cobo, M. J., et al. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
De Wit, H. (2011). Trends, issues and challenges in internationalisation of higher education. Amsterdam: Centre for Applied Research on Economics and Management, School of Economics and Management of the Hogeschool van Amsterdam.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (2007). Research on higher education in Europe. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00239.x
Kwiek, M. (2018). International research collaboration and international research orientation: Comparative findings about European academics. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(2), 136-160.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of interdisciplinarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614
Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2645–2653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.006
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states: A conceptual framework. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014699605875
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Research Policy, 38(3), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure and international collaboration. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0


