EMPLOYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIARY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5685Palavras-chave:
Smart Technologies, Independence of the Constitutional Judiciary, Smart Tools, Iraqi Federal Supreme Court, Rights and Freedoms, Constitutional LitigationResumo
The world is witnessing rapid technological developments, which have been reflected in all areas of life, including the judiciary, and due to the capabilities of artificial intelligence in learning and acquiring knowledge, it is necessary to examine the possibilities of employing it in constitutional litigation, as it is the pillar of the legal and political system and the basis for protecting rights and freedoms, and the paper aims to describe the stages of introducing artificial intelligence in this type of litigation, without prejudice to the role of the human judge in analysis and evaluation, and along these lines, we will divide this paper into two stages; the first stage is the stage before the case reaches the competent constitutional judge, and the second stage is the subsequent one.
Referências
- Al-Karim YA (2023) Artificial Intelligence Judgment Digitization Approach and Application: International Academy of Mediation and Arbitration, pp. 4-30. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG2.2..10259.45604
- Al-Murr A (2003) Judicial control of the constitutionality of laws in its main features: René-Jean Daboui Center for Law and Development, Alexandria.
- Al-Muttalib, M.A. (2020) Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Law Enforcement: Arab Renaissance House, Cairo.
- Al-Sattar, SA (2023) The affective construction of constitutional court rulings: Journal of Legal Studies, 61(2), September 2023, pp765-861.
- Ashley K D (2017) Artificial intelligence and legal analytics: New tools for law practice in the digital age. Cambridge University Press,p.p351-352.
- Barysė D & Sarel R (2024) Algorithms in the court: Does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32:117,p118-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6
- Brożek B, Furman M, Jakubiec M, & Kucharzyk B (2024) The black box problem revisited: real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making: Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32(2), p427-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9
- El-Shennawy M W (2016) Judicial control over constitutional amendments, Dar Al-Fikr and Law for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo.
- Fine A & Marsh S (2024) Judicial leadership matters (yet again): The associationbetween judge and public trust for artificial intelligence in courts: Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00142-3
- Górski M (2023) Why a human court? On the right to a human judge in the context of the fair trial principle: eucrim - The European Criminal Law Associations' Forum, 1, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2023-008
- Huq A Z (2020) Constitutional rights in the machine learning state: (Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 752). University of Chicago Law School, pp1-53. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/public_law_and_legal_theory/
- Lucero K (2019) Artificial Intelligence Regulation and China's Future: Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 33(1) p94-171.
- Medvedeva M, Wieling M, & Vols M. (2023) Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law,31(2),pp195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506 -021-09306-3
- Saiz P (2021) Docket selection and judicial responsiveness: The use of AI in the Colombian Constitutional Court: William&Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 30(2),pp418-453. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol30/iss2/9
- Taleb, M.J. (2020) Mohammed Jabbar Taleb, The Judicial Policy of the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Doctoral dissertation, Al-Alamein Institute for Graduate Studies, Najaf
- Zafar A (2024) Balancing the scale: Navigating ethical and practical challenges of artificial intelligence: (AI) integration in legal practices: Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(27). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00121-8
AI Online Course (n.d.) Lawgeex: https://www3.technologyevaluation.com/solutions/53516/lawgeex?srsltid=AfmBOopEOvUweFhKCSyXbvvMcX5aZmvolTz55cmgv8c0Bp4BykN60cZy (Accessed March 4, 2025)
AI Online Course (n.d.) Lex Machina [AI software overview]. AIONLINECOURSE: https://www.aionlinecourse.com/ai-softwares/lex-machina (Accessed March 4, 2025)
Al-Assar YM (1999) The role of scientific considerations in the constitutional judiciary: Arab Renaissance House, Cairo
Al-Hamouti AA (2024) The role of artificial intelligence in the rule of law: Zaytuna University of Jordan Legal Journal, Special Issue, pp. 873-899. doi:10.15849/ZJJLS.240330.4 https://DOI
Al-Musawi MJ (2021) The Judicial Policy of the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Doctoral dissertation, Al-Alameen Institute for Graduate Studies, Najaf.
-Ayash SZN (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence technologies on constitutional and legal texts: College of Law Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, 31(84), pp1-36.
-Custers B&Fosch-Villaronga E (Eds.) (2022) Law and Artificial Intelligence: (Vol. 35). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007k /978-94-6265-523-2.
ESCC (1981, May 16) Judgment in Case No. 5/1, Const. Jud.
ESCC (1985, February 2) Judgment in Case No. 67/1, Const. Jud.
ESCC (1987, May 16) Judgment in Case No. 131/6, Const. Jud.
ESCC (1997, August 2) Judgment in Case No. 35/17, Const. Jud. Official Gazette, No. 33, p. 821.
ESCC (2003, August 17) Decision in Request No. 1/24, Legislative Interpretation. ESCC (2004, March 7) Decision in Request No. 1/26, Legislative Interpretation.
ESCC (2005, April 10) Judgment in Case No. 157/24, Const. Jud. ESCC (2005, May 8) Judgment in Case No. 42/26, Const. Jud.
ESCC (2006, April 9) Judgment in Case No. 120/26, Const. Jud . ESCC (2012, June 14) Judgment in Case No. 20/34, Const. Jud.
European Reporter (2021) Artificial Intelligence in the EU between budget and benefit EU Reporter. https://ar.eureporter.co/frontpage/ (Accessed February 2, 2025)
Gutiérrez J D (n.d.) ChatGPT in Colombian Courts. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/colombian-chatgpt/ (Accessed March 4, 2025)
Hamid RB (2018) Formal procedures for filing a direct constitutional lawsuit in Iraq: Official website of the Iraqi Federal Supreme Court. https://www.iraqfsc.iq/news (Accessed March 5, 2025)
-Hashiguchi M (2024) Constitutional rights of artificial intelligence: Washington Journal of Law, Technology&Arts, 19(2),pp23-63. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjlta/vol19/iss2/2
-Hassan FA (2023), The role of artificial intelligence in promoting effective justice before the judiciary - Master's thesis, Qatar University, College of Law, pp. 1-168.
-Hathem, M.A. (2018), The Federal Supreme Court in the Iraqi Constitution: Manshurat Zain Al-Huqqawiya, Beirut.
IFSC (2011, May 5) Decision No. 34/Federal/2011. Retrieved March 23, 2022, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2011, May 5) Jurisprudential Decision No. 24/Federal/2011. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2016, April 6) Decision of Abandonment No. 21/Federal/2016. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2017, April 4) Interpretative Decision No. 35/Federal/2017. Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2017, May 21) Decision No. 54/Federal/2017. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2017, October 10) Decision No. 104/Federal/Media/2017. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2018, February 12) Jurisprudential Decision No. 28/Federal/Media/2018. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2019) Decisions No. 155, 157, 160, 161, 161, 162, 164, 165, 167, 168/Federal/2019. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2019, April 28) Interpretative Decision No. 90/Federal/2019. Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2019, March 11) Decision No. 3/Federal/Media/2019. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2021, June 6) Jurisprudential Decision No. 48/Federal/2021. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
IFSC (2021, September 29) Decision No. 35/Federal/2021. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
-Imam. HM (2024) The role of intelligence in promoting justice: Challenges and opportunities: Journal of Social Studies, 30(1), 60-80.
-Iraqi Federal Supreme Court (IFSC) (2007, January 8) Decision No. 25/Federal/2007. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.iraqfsc.iq/ethadai.php
Iraqi Ministry of Communications (n.d.) Iraqi National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (INSAI). https://arabic.iraqi.ai/ (Accessed March 4, 2025)
-Janabi AS (2022) The role of the constitutional judiciary in the development of constitutional texts: Dar Al Musalla, Baghdad.
Judson A (2023) Lex Machina launches legal analytics for new practice area: Class action litigation. LexisNexis. https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/pressroom/b/news/posts/lex-machina-launches-legal-analytics-for-new-practice-area-class-action-litigation (Accessed March 6, 2025)
-Karim, S.A. (2022) The Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Doctoral dissertation, Karbala University, Faculty of Law.
-Laptev VA, & Feyzrakhmanova D R (2024) Application of artificial intelligence in justice: current trends and future prospects. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems: 4,PP394-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-024-00074-2
-Mohammed M F (2022) Legislative regulation of artificial intelligence applications: Journal of Legal and Economic Research, no (81), pp 1024-1137.
-Perona R&Carrillo de la Rosa Y (2024) Unveiling AI in the courtroom: Exploring ChatGPT's impact on judicial decision-making through a pilot Colombian case study. AI&Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01943-x
-Salhi MBE (2008), Procedures for issuing a constitutional judgment: Journal of Legal Sciences, 23(1), pp. 76-121. https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM- .
-Stern R E, Lipman B L, Roberts M E,&Wang A (2022) Automated justice? Artificial intelligence in Chinese courts: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 59,pp514-553.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4026798
-Taniady V, & Siahaan S T (2023) Artificial intelligence and the constitutional court: A new path of making independent decisions?: Jornal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 3(2),PP157-184. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v3i2.41726
-Verheij B (2020) Artificial intelligence as law: Presidential address to the seventeenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law: Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(2),p181-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506 -020-09266
-Zhang J, & Moreira J I (2023) Promoting trustworthiness in the application of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: The intersection of media communication, court decisions, and public trust. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 18(2), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo4756330.
-Zheng G G (2020) China's grand design of people's smart courts. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7,p.p561-582. https://doi.org/10.1017/als2020..20 .
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
