COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SPORTS-PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING SYSTEM FOR ATHLETES IN CHONGQING AND BISHKEK:USING THE EXAMPLE OF TENNIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5658Palavras-chave:
Sports Pedagogy, Tennis, Athlete Development Pathways, Comparative Case Study, City-Level AnalysisResumo
This study presents a comparative analysis of the sports-pedagogical training systems for tennis athletes in Chongqing (People’s Republic of China) and Bishkek (Kyrgyz Republic), conceptualizing the city as a meso-level unit of athlete development. Guided by a framework linking city-level systemic inputs to sports-pedagogical training processes and athlete development outcomes, the study adopts a qualitative comparative case study design based on document analysis. The findings indicate that Chongqing operates within a state-coordinated and vertically integrated training system characterized by dense development pathways, standardized coaching practices, and structured monitoring mechanisms. In contrast, Bishkek relies on a more decentralized, federation- and club-based system marked by greater variability in training processes, lower competition density, and limited institutional support. The comparison demonstrates that differences in governance arrangements and resource environments are closely associated with the coherence and sustainability of athlete development pathways. By focusing on the city as the unit of analysis and tennis as a representative sport, this study contributes to comparative sport pedagogy and provides empirical insights into how training systems function under contrasting institutional conditions.
Referências
Bailey, R., Collins, D., Ford, P., MacNamara, Á., Toms, M., & Pearce, G. (2010). Participant development in sport: An academic review. Sports Coach UK.
De Bosscher, V., Bingham, J., Shibli, S., van Bottenburg, M., & De Knop, P. (2008). The global sporting arms race: An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Meyer & Meyer.
De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., Westerbeek, H., & van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Successful elite sport policies: An international comparison of the Sports Policy factors Leading to International Sporting Success (SPLISS 2.0). Meyer & Meyer.
Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development: Policy learning and political priorities. Routledge.
Hong, F. (2011). China. In B. Houlihan & M. Green (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports development (pp. 52–67). Routledge.
Houlihan, B., & Zheng, J. (2013). The Olympics and elite sport policy: Where will it all end? The International Journal of the History of Sport, 30(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2013.765726
Liu, Y., & Chen, S. (2021). Integration of sports and education in China: Policy evolution and practical challenges. Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), 1–8.
Riordan, J. (2007). Sport in Soviet society: Development of sport and physical education in Russia and the USSR. Cambridge University Press.
Shilbury, D., Sotiriadou, P., & Green, B. C. (2014). Sport development systems, policies and pathways: An introduction to the special issue. Sport Management Review, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.10.003
Zhang, J., Zhao, K., & Xiong, H. (2020). Early specialization, athlete burnout and policy responses in China’s youth sports system. Sport, Education and Society, 25(8), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1661395
Zheng, J. (2016). Sport policy in China. Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0



