A BİBLİOMETRİC AND SYSTEMATİC ANALYSİS OF THE RELATİONSHİP BETWEEN DİGİTAL LEARNİNG DYNAMİCS AND MAARİF MODEL AXİOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5340Palavras-chave:
Digital Natives, Maarif Model, Digital Learning Dynamics, Bibliometric Analysis, Systematic Review, Phygital WisdomResumo
The techno-sociological transformation brought about by digital technologies in the 21st century has given rise to a new student profile known as "digital natives." Shaped by the speed of information access, the pursuit of instant gratification, and visually-oriented thinking, this algorithmic mindset necessitates the transformation of traditional teaching paradigms. This study aims to examine the ontological and epistemological relationship between the techno-cultural habitus of digital natives and value-oriented educational approaches, utilizing the "Maarif Model" as a sample. In this research designed with a mixed-methods literature review, a macroscopic bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer on the literature obtained from the Web of Science database. Subsequently, a microscopic systematic review was performed on 40 international studies selected in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. The findings reveal that the new generation's demands for autonomy, personalization, and experiential learning demonstrate a pedagogical alignment with flexible curriculum structures. Conversely, an ontological tension was identified between process orientation and virtue building, and the codes of dromological speed and instant gratification triggered specifically by artificial intelligence and digital platforms. Emphasizing that this tension is a process that needs to be managed, the study introduces the concepts of 'Axiological Slow Pedagogy' and 'Phygital Wisdom' to the literature—responding to the pursuits of global literature—and presents new pedagogical synthesis strategies where the teacher assumes the roles of 'curriculum designer' and 'moral filter'.
Referências
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A., Vargas, C. G. A. P., Ulloa, M. N. O., Ulloa, C. R. G., Romero, J. M. P., Jaramillo, N. D. G., Orellana, H. U. C., Anzoategui, D. X. A., & Roca, C. L. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Aghaz, A., Salmasi, S. D., & Mirzaee, M. (2025). Cultural values and gender differences in the association between Iranian university professors' authenticity and generation Z students' intention to migrate. European Journal of Education, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70212
Bag, S., Aich, P., & Islam, M. A. (2022). Behavioral intention of digital natives toward adapting the online education system in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0278
Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Berková, K., Kubisová, A., Krelová, K. K., Krpálek, P., & Holecková, L. (2024). The impact of socio-demographic factors on the use of digital learning platforms and forms of learning by generation Z engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(8), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i8.50279
Bezruchko, O., Chmil, H., Korablova, N., Demchuk, R., & Kuznietsova, I. (2025). Methodological analysis of the criteria for the cultural space of digitalization of the generation of higher education applicants. Revista Conrado, 21, 104.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2020). Exploring digital nativeness as a predictor of digital game-based L2 vocabulary acquisition. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 902–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1548489
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
Chen, K. Z., Tsai, M. H., Wu, C. I., & Tsai, H. F. (2024). Embrace and reject? Understanding the online experiences of junior high school students, parents, and teachers after the pandemic through six technological access discourses. Computers in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2441159
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Dennen, V. P., He, D., Shi, H., & Adolfson, D. (2023). College students, networked knowledge activities, and digital competence: Implications for online instructors. Online Learning, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4046
Dickinson-Delaporte, S., Gunness, A., & McNair, H. (2020). Engaging higher education learners with transmedia play. Journal of Marketing Education, 42(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318775138
Dugarova, T. T., Damdinov, A. V., Mamedova, L. V., Shakhmalova, I. Z., Tsibaeva, L. A., & Oorzhak, A. A. (2021). Methodological principles of organizing educational work of educational institutions in the digital reality. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, 25, 951–960. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.2.15279
Garai-Fodor, M., & Huszak, N. (2025). The potential of integrating conscious living into education for generation Z in the light of primary data. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1477879
Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4).
Gunduz, S. (2021). Examining the relationship between individual innovativeness and digital nativeness levels of teachers. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(205), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9006
Hassan, T. R. R., Ali, A. H., Ghazali, M. F. M., Ismail, N. H., Suliman, M. S., & Yaacob, M. F. C. (2024). Digitizing literature teaching materials through the Anyflip application. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 17.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & He, J. B. (2021). Digital nativity of university teachers in China: Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Digital Native Assessment Scale (DNAS). Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570278
Hughes, C. (2023). The changing dynamics of student engagement. In E. Sengupta (Ed.), Pandemic Pedagogy: Preparedness in Uncertain Times (Vol. 49, pp. 91–105). International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Association. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120230000049006
Hughes, E. S., Bradford, J., & Likens, C. (2018). Facilitating collaboration, communication, and critical thinking skills in physical therapy education through technology-enhanced instruction: A case study. TechTrends, 62(3), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0259-8
Hughes, M., & Bunney, K. (2025). The expectations and aspirations of the Gen Z education student. Phi Delta Kappan, 107(1-2), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217251377822
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayınevi.
Kim, D., & Ryoo, D. (2025). Exploring self-regulated learning and achievement goal orientation in Generation Z through Study with Me. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(4), 3130–3146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2437543
Kumar, R. N., Neerupa, C., Sengani, V., William, A. J., & Pavithra, R. (2025). How Millennial parents guide Generation Alpha in using educational apps. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(4), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2025-0019
Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus Books.
Liu, Y. J., Lam, C. B., Anglum, J. C., & Nguyen, T. D. (2025). New teachers in rural America. Phi Delta Kappan, 107(1-2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217251377823
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–320). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McCrindle, M. (2020). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. McCrindle Research.
McLay, K. F. (2019). Geeks, gamers, and girls: Revealing diverse digital identities with membership categorisation analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(6), 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1457625
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. University of Toronto Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2025). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli öğretim programları ortak metni [Century of Turkey Maarif Model common text for curricula]. Ministry of National Education Publications.
Nguyen, H. N. T. (2024). Educating a new generation: Blending traditional and contemporary standards for Vietnamese youth. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 17, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse2.158-169
Nurannisaa, P. B. S., Mustaji, Bachri, B. S., & Patricia, F. D. (2020). Building empathy exploring digital native characteristic to create learning instruction for learning computer graphic design. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(20), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.14311
Nuryadi, M. H., Widiatmaka, P., & Yanto, B. E. (2023). Developing nationalism character among the digital native generation through formal education in Indonesia. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 13(3), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.09
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps towards understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). EDUCAUSE.
Onjewu, A. K. E., Godwin, E. S., Azizsafaei, F., & Appiah, D. (2025). The influence of technology use on learning skills among generation Z: A gender and cross-country analysis. Industry and Higher Education, 39(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241263227
Owatnupat, N., & Kunlasuth, K. (2023). Idiosyncratic special education teacher's endgame and the rise of amicable minds of the twenty-first century. In P. Narot & N. Kiettikunwong (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Special and Inclusive Education in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex & Ambiguous (Vuca) World. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620230000020002
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books.
Polo, G. A. V. (2021). Using multimodal literacy: Challenges and opportunities in a nontraditional classroom. In M. F. Rice & A. K. Dallacqua (Eds.), Luminous Literacies: Localized Teaching and Teacher Education. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720210000036014
Pondelíková, I., & Luprichová, J. (2025). Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT in enhancing specialized communication skills in English language learning. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 13(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP250125003P
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Price-Williams, S., & Sasso, P. A. (2021). Facilitating co-curricular connections among millennial and Generation Z students in digital environments. In J. Hoffman & P. Blessinger (Eds.), International Perspectives on Supporting and Engaging Online Learners. International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Association. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120210000039006
Quadir, B., Chen, N. S., & Yang, J. C. (2019). Investigation of the generational differences of two types of blog writers: The generation gap influence. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(4), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019100104
Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
Routray, R., & Khandelwal, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption: Do Generation Z students feel technostress in deploying AI for completing courses of study at universities?. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(5), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2024-0115
Rudenkin, D. V. (2022). Online learning: Attitudes of Russian students. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 24(5), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-5-181-205
Sakdapat, N., Yuangngoen, P., Ngamcharoen, P., Kongtraipop, V., & Bhanthumnavin, D. E. (2025). An exploration of predictors of STEM knowledge integration among Generation Z students: Focusing on 21st century skills. Foro de Educación, 23(2), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.14201/fde.23205
Shliakhovchuk, E., Oliynyk, R., & García, A. M. (2021). Gen Zers' video game preferences and learning outcomes: Toward designing better games. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(2), 208–236. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.114075
Singh, M. (2024). Exploring the possibilities to implement metaverse in higher education institutions of India. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20715–20728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12691-2
Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Company.
Sunny, S. K., & Ramasamy, K. (2025). Digital literacy skills of students of Sacred Heart College, Chalakudy: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 17(1), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2023-0257
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing the world. McGraw-Hill.
Tunde, G., & Ramona, B. (2019). The bullying phenomenon among the new generations. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 9(1), 36–42.
Twenge, J. M. (2014). Generation me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before. Atria Books.
Virilio, P. (2007). Speed and politics: An essay on dromology. Semiotext(e).
Weng, X. J., Gu, M. M., Xia, Q., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). SWOT analysis of AI empowered entrepreneurship education: Insights from digital learners in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101763
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. HarperCollins.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Zhang, J., & Yu, S. Z. (2023). Investigating pedagogical challenges of mobile technology to English teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2767–2779. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1903933
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
