PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN PUBLIC HEALTH LAW: AN EXHAUSTIVE REVIEW OF SIMULATION, GAMIFICATION, AND LEGAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5153Palavras-chave:
Public Health Law, Simulation Based Learning, Gamification, Legal Education, Experiential PedagogyResumo
In order to better reflect contemporary professional practice, this study examines how public health law education has changed from its traditional reliance on case-based instruction to experiential, simulation-based, and multidisciplinary approaches. The Langdellian paradigm enhances analytical thinking, but it does not adequately prepare lawyers to handle complex problems like pandemics, cross-sector coordination, regulatory governance, and health disparities. The study is based on the constructivist and situated learning theories and demonstrates that the use of serious games, simulations, tabletop, legal epidemiology tools, and virtual reality enhances judgment, ethical awareness, teamwork, and systems thinking. Students are exposed to limitations, authority structures, and uncertainties that are often absent from typical classroom environments through experiential learning. The paper addresses risks like trivialization, design bias, unequal access, and digital divides in order to ensure that graduates are capable, moral, and practically successful in promoting universal health and professional responsibility across various legal and public health systems, both now and in the future. Additionally, it promotes equity-centered implementation, rigorous assessment, and carefully designed curricula.
Referências
1. Mashaw, “Jerry L. Mashaw and the Public Law Curriculum,” in Cambridge University Press eBooks, 2017, pp. 87–108. doi: 10.1017/9781316671641.004.
2. R. K. Stropus, “Mend it, bend it, and extend it: The Fate of Traditional law School Methodology in the 21st century,” LAW eCommons. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol27/iss3/2/
3. M. Wynia and D. Boren, “Better Regulation of Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials is Long Overdue,” The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 410–419, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00402.x.
4. B. Saxon, “Legal Epidemiology: Theory and methods,” Center for Public Health Law Research, 2023. https://phlr.temple.edu/news/2023/08/legal-epidemiology-theory-methods (accessed Feb. 09, 2026).
5. E. Rubin, “What’s Wrong with Langdell’s Method, and What to Do About It,” Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol60/iss2/12/
6. J. Smith, E. Gooderham, and J. Piper, “Learning from failure: Simulating pandemic agreement negotiations in a global health classroom,” PLOS Global Public Health, vol. 5, no. 8, p. e0003661, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003661.
7. D. J. Dausey, J. W. Buehler, and N. Lurie, “Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats,” BMC Public Health, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 92, May 2007, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-92.
8. S. Burris, M. Ashe, D. Levin, M. Penn, and M. Larkin, “A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of legal Epidemiology,” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 135–148, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021841.
9. Á. Hyland and S. Kilcommins, “Signature pedagogies and legal education in universities: epistemological and pedagogical concerns with Langdellian case method,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–42, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1080/13562510802602517.
10. Southern Illinois University Simmons Law School, “National Health Law Moot Court Competition,” 2025. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://law.siu.edu/programs/moot-court/health-law-competition.php
11. L. S. Shulman, “Signature pedagogies in the professions,” Daedalus, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 52–59, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015.
12. M. O’Toole et al., “‘They mirror what they see’ : A constructivist grounded theory study of simulation culture in four professional domains in Ireland,” Medical Teacher, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1478–1485, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2311863.
13. S. Ross, “Simulation-Based Learning: From learning theory to pedagogical application,” NSUWorks. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol19/iss4/15/
14. M. H. B. Khairunnizam, N. I. Mohd, and H. L. T. Ariffin, “Review of gamification approach in legal Studies,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, vol. IX, no. IIIS, pp. 5153–5172, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0372.
15. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning. 1991. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511815355.
16. “Stein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. ERIC Digests. (Last checked March 23, 2011) - References - Scientific Research Publishing.” https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=147826
17. L. T. McElroy, “From Grimm to Glory: simulated oral argument as a component of legal education’s signature pedagogy,” Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol84/iss2/5/
18. P. Maharg and E. Nicol, “Simulation and technology in legal education: a systematic review and future research programme,” ANU Open Research (Australian National University), pp. 17–42, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.13140/rg.2.1.1911.3129.
19. C. C. Abt, “Serious games : Abt, Clark C : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive,” Internet Archive, 1970. https://archive.org/details/seriousgames0000abtc
20. D. C. De Oliveira, F. Bielser, D. Bonnard, Y. Songuel, and D. Jaccard, “A Serious Game for Patient’ Rights Education,” International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health, pp. 1–6, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1109/segah52098.2021.9551898.
21. Maggie Silver, A. James, H. Bob, E. Alissa, and C. Mark, Preparedness 101: Zombie Pandemic. 2011. doi: 10.15620/cdc/6023.
22. L. Thomas, “U-M prepares for ‘zombie apocalypse,’” University of Michigan News, Apr. 10, 2023. https://news.umich.edu/u-m-prepares-for-zombie-apocalypse/
23. S. Y. Liaw et al., “Design and evaluation of a 3D virtual environment for collaborative learning in interprofessional team care delivery,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 81, pp. 64–71, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.06.012.
24. S. Scialabba, “Virtual Reality as a Medium for Evidence: Speculated vs. Realized Benefits and Harms,” Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Jan. 30, 2025. https://jtip.law.northwestern.edu/2025/01/30/virtual-reality-as-a-medium-for-evidence-speculated-vs-realized-benefits-and-harms/
25. S. E. Technologies, “Compliance Training VR: Revolutionising Legal Education,” Spark, Oct. 04, 2024. https://sparkemtech.co.uk/blog/compliance-training-vr-revolutionising-legal-education/ (accessed Feb. 09, 2026).
26. D. J. Dausey, J. W. Buehler, and N. Lurie, “Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats,” BMC Public Health, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 92, May 2007, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-92.
27. C. Bradshaw and T. Bartenfeld, “Exercise Evaluation Guides for Public Health Emergency Preparedness,” Homeland Security Affairs, Feb. 24, 2025. https://www.hsaj.org/articles/95 (accessed Feb. 09, 2026).
28. Public Health Law, “The Public Health Emergency Law Competency Model,” Public Health Law, May 16, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/about/emergency-law-competency-model.html
29. IRELAND, M. SANSON, and P. ROGERS, “VIRTUAL MOOT COURT: a PILOT STUDY,” VIRTUAL MOOT COURT: A PILOT STUDY, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JlALawTA/2010/2.pdf
30. P. Maharg, “Educating the Digital Lawyer - Harvard Law School Center on the Legal Profession,” Harvard Law School Center on the Legal Profession, Nov. 08, 2022. https://clp.law.harvard.edu/knowledge-hub/academic-publications/educating-the-digital-lawyer/
31. S. Burris, M. Ashe, D. Levin, M. Penn, and M. Larkin, “A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of legal Epidemiology,” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 135–148, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021841.
32. Institute of Health Law Research Team, “Research protocol for legal epidemiology for accelerating the implementation of International Health Regulations in the European Region pilot project in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Serbia and Switzerland,” 2019. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://lawatlas.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/WHO_IHR_Protocol_Oct_2019.pdf
33. Center for Public Health Law Research, “Bringing Legal Epi to UNC-Chapel Hill,” Center for Public Health Law Research, 2024. https://phlr.temple.edu/news/2024/07/bringing-legal-epi-unc-chapel-hill? (accessed Feb. 09, 2026).
34. R. Vargas-Murillo, I. N. M. De La Asuncion Pari-Bedoya, and F. De Jesus Guevara-Soto, “Virtual gamification strategies and their impact on legal education experiences: a systematic review,” International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 85–90, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3606094.3606100.
35. Calano, “Bridging the digital divide in education through the Every Student Succeeds Act,” Georgetown Law Technology Review, Jun. 09, 2022. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/bridging-the-digital-divide-in-education-through-the-every-student-succeeds-act/
36. Peck, “The Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation (with Examples),” Devlin Peck, Sep. 25, 2023. https://www.devlinpeck.com/content/kirkpatrick-model-evaluation
37. L. Stufflebeam, and G. Zhang, The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications., 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_CIPP_Evaluation_Model.html?id=5lTLDAAAQBAJ&
38. The Hermeneutics of Care: Dialogues between the Contemporary Patterns and Humanistic Health Education in Recent Literature (2020–2025) | Semantic Scholar, accessed February 13, 2026, doi: 10.52521/kg.v23i1.17174.
39. Comparing Kirkpatrick's original and new model with CIPP ..., accessed February 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856911/
40. The Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model - University of San Diego Online Degrees, accessed February 13, 2026, https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/kirkpatrick-training-evaluation-model/
41. The Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model for Effective Training - Learning Everest, accessed February 13, 2026, https://www.learningeverest.com/the-kirkpatrick-evaluation-model-for-effective-training/
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
