WEAVING CULTURE INTO THE CITY: DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC SPACES IN MOSCOW

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5127

Palavras-chave:

Cultural Sustainability, Urban Regeneration, Place-Making, Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)

Resumo

The rapid expansion of cities often leads to generic, identity-poor public spaces in peripheral and mid-ring districts, undermining social sustainability and community cohesion. This study explores the integration of intangible cultural heritage as a tool for creating more meaningful and sustainable urban environments. This research aims to develop and test a methodology for transposing the rich symbolic language of traditional Azerbaijani carpet ornaments into the architectural and landscape design of public spaces near metro stations in Moscow. The research employed a mixed-methods approach: ethnographic fieldwork at the National Carpet Museum in Baku to decode the semantics of recurring motifs (e.g., 'Buta,' 'Tree of Life'); urban analysis to identify suitable underutilized sites near metro stations based on functional balance and pedestrian accessibility metrics; experimental design by architecture students to apply these motifs to facades and public squares. The study resulted in a portfolio of design proposals that demonstrate a viable model for ‘cultural transposition.’ The motifs provided a framework for organizing space, creating rhythm, and embedding narratives, moving beyond mere decoration to inform layout and function. Sites near stations like Belayevo and Babushkinskaya were identified as high-potential candidates for such interventions. The research concludes that traditional ornaments can serve as a powerful database for sustainable urban design, fostering place identity and cultural connectivity. This approach offers a transferable model for leveraging specific cultural heritage to address the global challenge of sustainable and culturally sensitive urban development, contributing to the sustainable cities and communities’ goals.

Referências

Agamalieva, E. Ch. (2017). Peculiarities of the artistic composition of Azerbaijan carpet arts. Universum: Philology and Art History, 5(39). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-hudozhestvennyh-kompozitsiy-azerbaydzhanskogo-kovrovogo-iskusctva/viewer

Danilina, N. V. (2018). "Nomadic urbanism" — a modern approach to the planning of urban public territories [Nomadic urbanism — sovremennyy podkhod k planirovaniyu gorodskikh obshchestvennykh territoriy]. Ecology of Urbanized Areas, (2).

Efendi, R., and T. Efendi. 2006. Gazakh Khalchachilig Maktabi. [Gazakh Carpet Weaving School] Baki: Elm.

Effendiev, G. (2003). Dekorativno-prikladnoye iskusstvo Azerbaydzhana XIX - nachala XX vv [Decorative and applied arts of Azerbaijan of the 19th - early 20th centuries]. Chashyoglu.

Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Island Press.

Ikonnikov, A. V. (1986). Funktsiya, forma, obraz v arkhitekture [Function, form, image in architecture]. Stroyizdat.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.

Kadyrov, T. E. (2014). Public spaces: Phenomena, trends and processes [Obshchestvennyye prostranstva: Fenomeny, tendentsii i protsessy]. Izvestiya KGASU, 4(30), 115–120.

Koolhaas, R. (1995). The Generic City. In S, M, L, XL. Monacelli Press.

Mamedova, L. A. (2022). The specifics and themes of Azerbaijani story carpets [Spetsifika i tematika azerbaydzhanskikh syuzhetnykh kovrov]. Problems of Science, 1(69). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsifika-i-tematika-azerbaydzhanskih-syuzhetnyh-kovrov/viewer

Melikova Sh. (2021) Azerbaijan National Carpet Museum. https://www.jozan.net/azerbaijan-national-carpet-museum/.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

Petrovskaya, E. I., Ezhikova, D. A., & Valkova, E. A. (2021). Approbation of a methodology for the formation of local environmental regulations [Aprobatsiya metodiki formirovaniya lokal'nykh sredovykh reglamentov]. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2(55), 276–308. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2021-2-276-308

Project for Public Spaces (2023). What is Placemaking? https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking

Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Pion.

Tagieva, R. (2009). The art of Azerbaijani carpet weaving in the context of inter-civilizational dialogue [Iskusstvo azerbaydzhanskogo kovrotkachestva v kontekste mezhdutsivilizatsionnogo dialoga]. The Caucasus and Globalization, 3(2-3). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/iskusstvo-azerbaydzhanskogo-kovrotkachestva-v-kontekste-mezhtsivilizatsionnogo-dialoga

Throsby, D. (1997). Sustainability and Culture: Some Theoretical Issues. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 4(1), 7-19.

Trofimova, T. E., & Rodionovskiy, A. N. (n.d.). Development of public spaces: The impact of metro stations construction on the formation of the structure of the adjacent territory. Retrieved from https://bstu-journals.ru/archives/11728

Vlasov, D. N. (2017). Transportno-peresadochnyye uzly [Transportation hubs] [Monograph, electronic educational publication]. NIU MGSU.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-03-02

Como Citar

Trofimova, T., & Rodionovsky, A. (2026). WEAVING CULTURE INTO THE CITY: DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC SPACES IN MOSCOW. Veredas Do Direito , 23, e235127. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5127