INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PENTAHELIX COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE: ADDRESSING POVERTY TARGETING GAPS IN DKI JAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5048Palavras-chave:
Artificial Intelligence, Collaborative Governance, Pentahelix Model, Urban Poverty, Targeting Precision, Data Integration, Metropolitan Governance, Sociotechnical SystemsResumo
Urban poverty in rapidly urbanizing metropolitan areas requires coordinated, data-driven interventions involving multiple stakeholders. Although DKI Jakarta has achieved poverty rates below the national average (declining from 4.44% to 4.28% in 2024–2025), inequality remains high (Gini ratio 0.441), accompanied by targeting gaps in which 5.5% of priority beneficiaries are not reached due to data fragmentation and weak inter-agency coordination. This study explores the strategic integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within collaborative governance frameworks to improve poverty targeting accuracy and multi-stakeholder coordination in DKI Jakarta, focusing on the operationalization of the pentahelix model. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis involving government, private sector, academia, civil society, and community actors. Data analysis employed NVivo 12 with first-level coding based on Hymes’ SPEAKING model and second-level thematic analysis. The findings indicate that AI-enabled poverty governance functions as a complex sociotechnical system, where AI applications primarily support data infrastructure through deduplication and inter-agency synchronization. Targeting precision emerges from the integration of algorithmic analytics with community-based validation rather than automation alone. However, implementation faces challenges related to data governance, human resource capacity, infrastructure limitations, and digital inequality. The study proposes an AI-Enhanced Pentahelix Collaborative Governance Model, emphasizing that effective AI use depends on institutional capacity building and sustained collaborative processes, with AI serving as an augmentative tool rather than a replacement for human decision-making.
Referências
Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), Article 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Banala, S., Gutta, L. M., Kanchepu, N. R., Gudala, M., & Whig, P. (2024). Quantitative impact of artificial intelligence on smart cities: A comparative study using federated learning. IET Conference Proceedings, 2024, 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.2043
Bansal, D., & Bhattacharya, N. (2025). Synergistic innovations: Transforming urban crisis management through AI, blockchain, and social networks. Advances in Computers, 140, 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2024.11.002
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Profil kemiskinan Indonesia Maret 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2024). Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam angka 2024. https://jakarta.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/baae7b80d16101c7bef30cc0/provinsi-dki-jakarta-dalam-angka-2024.html
BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2024). Profil kemiskinan Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2023 (Vol. 7). Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. In Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems (pp. 1–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
Chougule, M. (2026). Democratizing AI in transportation through international collaboration: A case study of open-source mobility platforms in the Global South. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 27, Article 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101294
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Demirkol, M. (2025). Metropolitan managers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. In AI-driven tools for sustainable public administration (pp. 67–89). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6788-9.ch004
Du, M., Wang, L., & Di Nardo, M. (2025). Reinforcement learning-based sustainable educational intervention: An intelligent decision-making paradigm for global poverty reduction. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE 2025) (pp. 234–239). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDIE62017.2025.00052
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Gawusu, S., & Zhang, X. (2026). Multi-scale reinforcement learning framework for development policy optimization: Evidence from energy poverty alleviation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 207, Article 114912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114912
Ghazinoory, S., Pahlavanian, M., Fatemi, M., Mosakhani, M., & Ahad Bhat, S. (2025). How AI contributes to poverty alleviation: A systematic literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 15(1), e1542. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1542
Handayani, N., Risyanti, R., & Simangunsong, F. (2023). Collaborative governance dalam penanggulangan kemiskinan di Kabupaten Bangkalan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, 13(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.33701/jiwbp.v13i2.3329
Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2009). Handbook on poverty and inequality. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7613-3
Islam, M. I., Nisa, K. U., Ikhlaq, S., Khurshid, Z., Hussain, W., & Ansarullah, S. I. (2026). Fostering social innovation through urban technologies. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 526, 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8350-3_29
Juárez-Merino, M. Á. (2025). Artificial intelligence and citizenship in Latin American governments. Public Administration Issues, 2025(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-1-87-112
Kapoor, A., & Kumar, D. (2025). Federated learning for urban sensing systems: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 27(1), 428–472. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3435793
Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2014). The collaborative push: Moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 18, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9234-5
Khan, A. A., Laghari, A. A., Alroobaea, R., Alshehri, M. D., & Alsayaydeh, J. A. J. (2024). Secure remote sensing data with blockchain distributed ledger technology: A solution for smart cities. IEEE Access, 12, 64842–64858. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3397156
Kopac, L., & Das, S. (2025). Pixel by pixel: Constructing smart cities with AI building blocks. In Generative AI for a net-zero economy (pp. 187–204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74690-3_11
Lartey, D., & Law, K. M. Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption in urban planning governance: A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 256, Article 105260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105260
Lawelai, H., & Nurmandi, A. (2022). The model of collaborative governance in addressing poverty in Indonesia. Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (RAPIK), 2(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.962928/rapik.v2i2.226
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Muslim, M. A., Prasojo, E., & Jannah, L. M. (2021). Collaborative governance for poverty alleviation: A systematic mapping study. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2021-8-1-20-36
Nizamani, M. M., Qureshi, S., Tarashkar, M., Mirjat, A., & Lai, Z. (2025). Ethical AI: Human-centered approaches for adaptive and sustainable urban planning and policy. Land Use Policy, 148, Article 107412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107412
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Oyetade, K., & Zuva, T. (2025). Advancing equitable education with inclusive AI to mitigate bias. Educational Process: International Journal, 14(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.141.1
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.
Pohan, M. A. R. (2023). Kajian literatur pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan dalam merespons prioritas pembangunan Kota Bandung. Jurnal Teknologi dan Komunikasi Pemerintahan, 5(2), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtkp.v5i2.3620
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
Robles, P., & Mallinson, D. J. (2025). Advancing AI governance with a unified theoretical framework. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 8(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvae022
Sanchez, T. W., Brenman, M., & Ye, X. (2025). The ethical concerns of artificial intelligence in urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 91(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2312094
Saxena, D., Kahn, Z., Moon, E. S.-Y., Levy, K., Procaccia, A. D., & Zimmerman, J. (2025). Emerging practices in participatory AI design in public sector innovation. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 589. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642418
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sheikh, A., & Chong, E. K. P. (2026). Multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for optimizing smart cities. Systems Engineering, 29(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21745
Tuan, K. M., Khuyen, M. T., & Thanh, N. T. (2025). Developing AI literacy for teachers in Vietnam’s schools. International Journal of Education and Practice, 13(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v13i1.3712
Vakaj, E., Mihindukulasooriya, N., Gaur, M., & Khan, A. (2024). Knowledge graphs for responsible AI. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 5273–5276. https://doi.org/10.1145/3627673.3679036
Velmurugan, R., Bhuvaneswari, R., Madraswale, M. A., & Thirumalaisamy, R. (2025). AI and governance: Smart cities, e-governance, and public service delivery. In Leveraging AI for inclusive and equitable development (pp. 234–256). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3058-6.ch012
Wang, L., & Pan, Q. (2025). Game-theoretic multi-agent reinforcement learning for economic resource allocation optimization. Informatica, 49(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i1.5234
Yandri, P., & Juanda, B. (2018). Memahami karakter kemiskinan perkotaan dengan pendekatan observasional. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 19(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.19.1.4276
Zolkafli, A., & Salleh, D. (2025). Community engagement in AI-driven urban development. In AI-driven strategies for inclusive and sustainable urbanization (pp. 156–178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8547-2_8
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
