GATS COMMITMENTS AND LIBERALIZATION OF THE SPORTS SERVICE INDUSTRY: WTO COMPLIANCE AND POLICY CHALLENGES

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4768

Palavras-chave:

Sports Service Industry, GATS, WTO, Liberalization, Policy Challenges

Resumo

The GATS has brought significant alterations to the liberalization process of the services sector worldwide it encompassing the sports service industry. The sports service industry is the individual who administers and delivers a myriad of services related to professional and amateur sports, and includes event management, athlete training, distribution, arena operations, and overseas service in the entertainment and economic industry. It is essential to realize how GATS commitments arise when focusing on sports services because the sports industry contributes greatly to the world development of the economy, trade liberalization strategies, and facilitation of cross-border services. At this point, researchers have not conducted much research on how the sports service sector fulfills GATS commitments using the procedures of compliance with WTO and policy implementation. This research gap study is relevant in the process of trying to set export policies on sports services that are appropriate to their exclusive nature. The research highlights the novel insights into the different versions of the application of GATS to the countries of the WTO, as well as the discrepancies between the international policy requirements and the national laws. The author attempts to address this research gap using GATS regulations and sports services industries to conduct research into the domestic policy management and compliance with the WTO issues faced by nations. The methodology to be used to analyse documents used in this study is a qualitative approach based on a systematic literature review (SLR). The results demonstrate that the little liberalization of the sports services industry in the GATS principles and tension between the trade requirements and local policy guidelines and different practices of GATS commitment follow-up by WTO members. The findings reveal that governments need to formulate special policies that combine the global market liberalization trends and the nature of the sports services sector in the course of achieving international commitments and national interests.

Referências

Ahmed, M. A. (2024). International Organization’s Approach to The Problems of Governing Globalization. Qalaai Zanist Journal, 9(4), 1320-1338. DOI https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.4.49

Araujo, B. M. (2022). Market Power Europe? Exporting EU disciplines on domestic services regulations through trade agreements. In Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor (pp. 53-73). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Azmeh, S., Foster, C., & Echavarri, J. (2020). The international trade regime and the quest for free digital trade. International Studies Review, 22(3), 671-692.

Banerjee, P., Mukherjee, A., & Srishti, A. (2024). E-commerce in trade agreements: India’s strategies and options. Journal of International Trade Policy, 15(3), 45–63.

Benz, S., & Rozensteine, I. (2021). Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Measuring services liberalisation and commitments in the GATS and RTAs. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/06/services-trade-restrictiveness-index-stri_193b9c5c/fee5c901-en.pdf

Chaitoo, R. (2020). International trade in services and developing countries. The Hague, Netherlands: Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries. https://www.cbi.eu/sites/default/files/market_information/researches/July%208-Final%20Report%20Phase%201_approved.pdf

Chandy, S. T., & Bhardwaj, P. (2020). Adjudicating Cryptocurrencies at the WTO: Potential Threshold and Substantive Issues. Global Jurist, 20(2), 20190046.

Citaristi, I. (2022). World Trade Organization—WTO. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022 (pp. 408-414). Routledge

Dash, A., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2024). India’s FTA with the EU: Opportunities and Challenges in Services Sector. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6763.

Daza ,J.L. S., Delimatsis, P., & Molinuevo, M. (2022). Market Access under the GATS–A Legal Commentary on Article XVI GATS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141380

Elliott, A. (2019). Closing the GATS Gap: Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreements & the Case for Equalizing Services Export Restrictions. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 58, 713.

Gagné, G. (2024). Preferential trade agreements and cultural products. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(1), 89–104.

Gao, H. (2022). Digital services trade and trade agreements. Unlocking the potential of digital services trade in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/842321/digital-services-trade-asia-pacific.pdf

Gari, G. (2024). Rules for Trade in Services 2.0: Adapting the GATS to a Changing Trade Landscape. Taylor & Francis.

Gounden, M. (2020). SuperSport International’s Footprint in Africa in Relation to Sport Tourism. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).

Gulotta, C. (2024). Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies Under the Framework of WTO Agreements. BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto, (1), 231-247.

Gupta, P. (2024). India’s Trade Integration with the Republic of Korea: A Services Trade Analysis of India–Korea CEPA. Journal of Asian Economic Integration, 6(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/26316846241261134

Khaskheli, M. B., & Zhao, Y. (2025). The Sustainability of Economic and Business Practices Through Legal Cooperation in the Era of the Hainan Free Trade Port and Southeast Asian Nations. Sustainability, 17(5), 2050.

Krishnan, G. A. N. A. N. T. H. A., & Nair, R. (2024). Economic and legal impact of free trade agreements on the economy of India: Specific focus on the micro, small, and medium industry in Kerala. International Journal of Economics and Law, 10(2), 56–72.

Leal-Arcas, R., Balzano, S., Deethae, J., Singh, T., & Skybova, K. (2020). Of International Trade, Climate Change, Investment and a Prosperous Future. Trade L. & Dev., 12, 405.

Meyer, T. (2021). The political economy of WTO exceptions. Wash. UL Rev., 99, 1299.

Noonan, C., & Plekhanova, V. (2020). Taxation of digital services under trade agreements. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(4), 1015-1039.

Nsour, M. A. (2023). The WTO and Using Digital Economy Technologies: Surviving the Race With Preferential Trade Agreements. Journal of World Trade, 57(5).

Ononye, U. P. (2024). The Changing Landscape of Sports Regulations: An Examination of the Impact of Regulatory Changes on Football Governance and Transfer Policies in Post-Brexit UK (Doctoral dissertation).

Panizzon, M., & Bisong, A. (2024). On the Move? Mode 4 and the Temporary Movement of Natural Persons in Preferential Trade Agreements.SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4787909

Pant, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2024). Is service orientation benefitting manufacturing exports from low-middle income countries? Firm-level empirical evidence from WBES Data. Global Business Review, 09721509241245544.

Rahman, M. N., & Rahman, N. (2022). Exploring digital trade provisions in Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in times of crisis: India and Asia-Pacific countries. Asia and the Global Economy, 2(2), 100036.

Ramazanov, A. (2021). World Trade Organization: The role of developing countries in the WTO. Challenges faced by developing countries joining the WTO and their solutions. Global Trade Review, 29(4), 130–148.

Ravuvu, A., Lui, J. P., Bani, A., Tavoa, A. W., Vuti, R., & Win Tin, S. T. (2021). Analysing the impact of trade agreements on national food environments: the case of Vanuatu. Globalization and Health, 17, 1-15.

Schubert, M. (2024). Neutrality of the Olympic Movement against recent developments in sport and geopolitics–need of reconceptualisation. The International Sports Law Journal, 24(2), 143-161.

Sayeg, F. M. (2019). The dispute settlement body and the GATS. The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Developing Country Perspective, 215-226.

Stock, F., & Stock, A. (2024). Creative Economy Outlook 2024. https://www.developmentaid.org/api/frontend/cms/file/2024/07/ditctsce2024d2_en.pdf

Wolff, A. W. (2022). WTO 2025: Enhancing global trade intelligence. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, (22-6).

Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Yang, M., ... & Yap, P. S. (2024). Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing regions: A comprehensive review and future perspectives for Asia and Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 172794.

Zhao, S. (2023). Culture and trade: Chinese practices and perspectives. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(2), 135-151

Zhou, Z. (2024). Emerging markets in global esports: Opportunities and Challenges. Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202404045711

Skarbek, D. (2020). Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(4), 409-422.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-02-06

Como Citar

Ma, X., Lian, D. K. C., Lang, C., & Yu, H. (2026). GATS COMMITMENTS AND LIBERALIZATION OF THE SPORTS SERVICE INDUSTRY: WTO COMPLIANCE AND POLICY CHALLENGES. Veredas Do Direito , 23, e234768. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4768