DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONING: INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4170Resumo
Resumo (Abstract):
Este artigo examina como as tecnologias digitais estão transformando os processos de questionamento parlamentar no Reino Unido, em Singapura e no Vietnã. Embora a tecnologia tenha contribuído para procedimentos mais rápidos, maior transparência e fortalecimento da responsabilização — remodelando, assim, o exercício do poder político —, seus efeitos variam significativamente entre os diferentes contextos nacionais. O estudo propõe um modelo analítico de quatro níveis para a transformação digital do questionamento parlamentar, que vai desde a simples digitalização dos procedimentos até modelos avançados que permitem a cocriação cidadã da agenda de questionamento. Com base nesse modelo, o artigo apresenta implicações de políticas públicas voltadas ao aprimoramento da eficácia e da responsabilização do questionamento parlamentar na era digital.
Referências
Allen, B., & Sarre, R. (2022). The practice of accountability in questioning prime ministers: Comparative evidence from Australia, Canada, Ireland, and the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(2), 314–332.
Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). London, England: Routledge.
Danaher, J., Hogan, M., Kerr, I., et al. (2017). Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 1–17.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Goh, Y. H. (2024, May 6). AI-powered search engine makes Singapore Parliament debates more accessible. The Straits Times.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansard Society. (2019). Tuned in or Turned Off? Public Attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. London, England: Hansard Society.
Hansard Society. (2025). Prime Minister’s Questions: Westminster’s weekly gladiatorial fight. Parliament Matters Podcast, Episode 104.
Hoang, N. (2025, October 15). Committee on Citizen Petitions and Supervision trains on the voter petition management system. People’s Representatives Newspaper.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2022). World e-Parliament Report 2022. Geneva, Switzerland: IPU.
Iswaran, S. (2020). Address to the Parliament of Singapore on the approval of live-streaming parliamentary sittings, 4 September 2020. Parliamentary Debates Singapore.
Kiewiet, D. R., & McCubbins, M. D. (1991). The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lai, L. (2020, September 5). In-principle agreement to live-stream Parliament sittings. The Straits Times.
Le, N., & Thu, H. (2011, January 8). From pre-approved speeches to live television. VietnamNet.
Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179.
Ngoc, V. (2015, September 4). Continuing to concretize constitutional provisions on parliamentary questioning. People’s Representatives Newspaper.
Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Salmond, R. (2014). Parliamentary question time: How legislative accountability mechanisms affect mass political engagement. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(3), 352–371.
Standing Committee of the National Assembly. (2023). Report on the Results of Monitoring the Resolution of Voter Petitions Submitted to the Fourth Session of the Fifteenth National Assembly. Hanoi, Vietnam.
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.
Vietnam National Assembly. (2022). Digital Transformation Plan of the National Assembly Office to 2025, with Orientation to 2030. Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vietnam National Assembly – Committee on Citizen Petitions. (2025). Report on Citizen Petition Work, July 2025. Hanoi, Vietnam.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
