DEVELOPING VIETNAMESE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS IN A NON ENGLISH SPEAKING CONTEXT: CURRENT CHALLENGES AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Autores

  • Tran Huu Tuyen Lac Hong University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4050

Palavras-chave:

Vietnam, Scholarly Publishing, Non English Speaking Countries, Journal Governance, Indexing, Open Science, Open Access, Research Evaluation

Resumo

Vietnam’s scientific publishing landscape is expanding rapidly, yet most domestic journals remain marginal in international indexing systems and global scholarly communication. This paper develops an integrated, governance oriented analysis of Vietnamese journal development under a non English speaking context, with particular attention to how language, evaluation incentives, editorial capacity, and open science pressures interact. Building on evidence from prior studies of Vietnam’s publication growth and collaboration structure, barriers faced by Vietnamese scholars—especially in the social sciences and humanities—and journal level compliance gaps for regional and global indexing, we argue that Vietnam’s journal system is constrained less by “individual quality deficits” than by structural bottlenecks: fragmented governance, weak professionalization of editorial work, limited international visibility infrastructure, and policy incentives that emphasize counted outputs over ecosystem quality. To address these challenges, we adapt the “journal ecological chain” approach used in open science contexts to articulate how actors (authors, editors, publishers, funders, platforms, regulators) and value flows (knowledge, reputation, resources) co evolve. We further connect journal governance to integrity and transparency tools, including open peer review, open access development pathways, and data stewardship norms such as FAIR (Wilkinson et al., 2016). The paper concludes with a staged policy roadmap for Vietnam that emphasizes bilingual discoverability, editorial professionalization, sustainable open access financing, transparent integrity standards, and periodic policy revision mechanisms informed by comparative regulatory scholarship.

Referências

Amano, T., González Varo, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLOS Biology, 14(12), e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933

Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

Chang, Z., Zhang, J., Ye, X., Liu, W., & Hou, C. (2024). Transformation and development strategy of ecological chain of scientific journals under the background of open science. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 35(11), 1523–1529. https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202404170378

Ding, G., Chen, L., Gao, F., & Ma, C. (2023). Current situation of scientific journal publishing in typical non English speaking countries and guidance to the development of scientific journals in China. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 34(12), 1578–1583. https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202305100339

Gomes, M. F., & Sampaio, J. A. L. (2019). Biopiracy and traditional knowledge: Faces of biocolonialism and its regulation. Veredas do Direito, 16(34), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v16i34.1274

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLOS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

Long, B. T., & Toan, N. D. (2015). Scientific and technological journals in Vietnam: The current state and direction of development. Science Editing, 2(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.31

Manh, H. D. (2015). Scientific publications in Vietnam as seen from Scopus during 1996–2013. Scientometrics, 105(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1655-x

Nguyen, T. T. H., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen, H. D., Vuong, Q.-H., Cao, Q.-T., & Dinh, V.-H. (2021). The adoption of international publishing within Vietnamese academia from 1986 to 2020: A review. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1340

Phan Thi, T.-T., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen, H.-L., & Nguyen, L.-C. (2021). International academic publishing in Vietnam: Policy efficiency and room for development. Science Editing, 8(2), 162–165. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.249

Pho, P. D. (2016). Obstacles to scholarly publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A case study of Vietnamese scholars. Publications, 4(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030019

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375

Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2

Santos, S. (2024). The revisional legislative process in urban policy and its foundations: Democracy and sustainability. Veredas do Direito, 21, e212459. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v21.2459-ing

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., Shea, B. J., & others. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2

Spadotto, A. J., Barreiro, M. D. R., & de Medeiros, G. A. (2017). Inferences on the Brazilian environmental crimes law in comparison with the Colombian criminal code. Veredas do Direito, 14(28), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v14i28.957

Sun, Y., Ren, Y., & Yuan, J. (2025). Policies, challenges, and countermeasures of using AIGC in academic journal publishing. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 36(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202409291084

Tran, T., Nguyen, L. T. M., Nghiem, T. T., Le, H. T. T., Nguyen, C. H., La, T. P., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, H. T.-T. (2019). Compliance of education journals in Vietnam with the minimum criteria to be indexed in the ASEAN Citation Index and Scopus. Science Editing, 6(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.175

Trinh, T. P. T., Tran, T., Le, H. T. T., Nguyen, T.-T., & Pham, H.-H. (2020). Factors impacting international indexed publishing among Vietnamese educational researchers. Learned Publishing, 33(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1323

Vuong, Q.-H. (2019). The harsh world of publishing in emerging regions and implications for editors and publishers: The case of Vietnam. Learned Publishing, 32(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1255

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Xie, H., Huang, X., & Zhang, H. (2024). Construction of publication ethics standards system for scientific journals in China. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 35(12), 1705–1714. https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202406050611

Yoon, J. W., Kim, N., & Chung, E. K. (2023). Characteristics of scholarly journals published in non English speaking countries: An analysis of Library and Information Science SCOPUS journals. Learned Publishing, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1520

Downloads

Publicado

2026-01-05

Como Citar

Tuyen, T. H. (2026). DEVELOPING VIETNAMESE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS IN A NON ENGLISH SPEAKING CONTEXT: CURRENT CHALLENGES AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS. Veredas Do Direito , 23, e234050. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4050