CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY BEYOND THE ENTITY: LESSONS FOR VIETNAM FROM ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW

Autores

  • Van Toan Ly Nam Can Tho University
  • Thanh Trung Vo University of Economics and Law https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5791-7422
  • Viet Tu Nguyen Van Hien University
  • Chi Dung Nguyen Nam Can Tho University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n4.3390

Palavras-chave:

Piercing The Corporate Veil, Liability, Business Entity, Enterprise Law

Resumo

The use of business entities as legal shields for criminal or fraudulent activities has become a pervasive issue in today’s economy. To effectively combat such misconduct, it is crucial to pierce the corporate veil that hides the true perpetrators behind these entities. This article explores the legal doctrine of veil piercing, which enables courts to disregard the separate legal personality of a corporation when fraud or other wrongful acts are committed under its guise. The analysis centers on two key questions: (1) what conditions warrant the application of the doctrine, and (2) whether liability should be confined to the shareholders’ invested capital or extend to their personal assets once the veil is lifted. The article also examines the application of this doctrine in Vietnam, analyzing relevant provisions in the country’s Enterprise Law and related regulations through case studies. Drawing from these insights, the article provides recommendations for businesses and policymakers to minimize legal risks and reduce unintended economic consequences for society.

Referências

Alting, C. (1995). Piercing the corporate veil in American and German law - liability of individuals and entities: A comparative view. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2(2), Article 4, 195.

Banno, M. (n.d.). Disregard of the corporate personality. Journal of Law, Politics, and Sociology, 44(3).

Cohen, M. (2016). A brief history of piercing the corporate veil. P.O. Box 19192 Boulder, CO 80308. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/hammurabi

Garner, B. A. (2009). Black's law dictionary (9th ed.). USA: Thomson Reuters.

Inoue, K. (1971). Enacting company law code and disregarding the corporate fiction. Sanno University Bulletin, 24(2), 2004.

Insolvency Act 1986 was enacted by the (1986). Section 213-214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The UK.

Kempin, F. G. Jr. (1967). Limited liability in historical perspective. American Business Law Association Bulletin, 13.

Mandaraka-Sheppard, A. (2013). New trends in piercing the corporate veil – the conservative versus the liberal approaches. Modern Maritime Law (3rd ed., pp. 2-3). Routledge.

OECD (2001). Behind the corporate veil: Using corporate entities for illicit purposes. OECD Publications Service, France.

Paton, W. A. (1938). Essentials of accounting (1st ed.). Macmillan Publisher.

Powell, F. (1931). Parent and subsidiary corporations: Liability of a parent corporation for the obligations of its subsidiary. Chicago: Callaghan.

Robert, W. H. (1997). Limited liability in historical perspective. Washington and Lee Law Review, 54(3), 615-636. Washington and Lee Law Review Publisher.

Smiddy, L. O., & Cunningham, L. A. (2010). Corporations and other business organizations: Cases, materials, problems (7th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 978-1-4224-7659-8.

The National Assembly of Vietnam (2020), clause 1, Article 46 The Enterprise Law 2020.

The Parliament of the United Kingdom (2006). Section 25 of the Company Act 2006. The UK.

Weissberg, K., & Moissinac, M. (1987). Piercing the corporate veil in France. International Financial Law Review, 35.

Wormser, I. M. (1912). Piercing the veil of corporate entity. Columbia Law Review, 12(6), 496-518. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1110931

Downloads

Publicado

2025-11-16

Como Citar

Ly, V. T., Vo, T. T., Nguyen, V. T., & Nguyen, C. D. (2025). CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY BEYOND THE ENTITY: LESSONS FOR VIETNAM FROM ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW. Veredas Do Direito , 22, e223390. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n4.3390

Edição

v. 22 (2025): Veredas do Direito, v. 22, 2025

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à  avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva  da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer  reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.

Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:

Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0