LAW AND COMMUNITY BEHAVIOR UPDATES BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM OF THE LAMPUNG INDIGENOUS TRIBE

Autores/as

  • Zainab Ompu Jainah
  • Danti Yudistiara
  • Gusti Wahyu Triyadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6266

Palabras clave:

Law Reform, Local Wisdom, Piil Pesenggiri, Lampung Customary Law, Legal Pluralism

Resumen

This research examines national law reform in its dialectical relationship with the local wisdom of the Lampung indigenous community, particularly the values of Piil Pesenggiri as a living philosophy that contains legal, social, and moral dimensions. The primary problem addressed is the gap between centralistic positive law and customary norms that live within the community. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the local wisdom of the Lampung indigenous community can be integrated into national law reform to shape community behavior that is harmonious between formal legal order and socio-cultural order. The method used is normative legal research employing statutory, case, comparative, theoretical, and philosophical approaches. The results show that the values of Piil Pesenggiri encompassing Juluk Adok, Nemui Nyimah, Nengah Nyappur, and Sakai Sambayan have strong constitutional relevance and can serve as a foundation for cultural wisdom-based local law reform. This research recommends the formation of Regional Regulations that systematically accommodate Lampung customary law within a framework of just legal pluralism.

Citas

Abdurrahman. Customary law according to the laws of the Republic of Indonesia. Cendana Press, 1984.

Ali, Z. Legal research methods. Graphic Rays, 2021.

Bedner, A.; Van Huis, S. Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism. Utrecht Law Review, v. 6, n. 2, p. 3-4, 2010.

Churniawan, E. Preparation of legal research proposals. Legal Research Methodology, p. 88.

Hadikusuma, H. Lampung society and cultural customs. Mandar Advanced, 1989.

Herlius, F. Customary law rules in prosecution for justice based on local wisdom. Perspectives: Legal and Development Problem Studies, v. 27, n. 2, p. 94-103, 2022.

Ismail, H.; Asy'ari, H.; Setiawan, A. The inheritance rights of the eldest son in Lampung Pepadun customary law: gender perspective (Study in Tegineng, Pesawaran Regency). Al-Hurriyah: Journal of Islamic Law, v. 4, n. 1, p. 56-67, 2019.

Melissaris, E. The more the merrier? A new take on legal pluralism. Social & Legal Studies, v. 13, n. 1, p. 57-79, 2004.

Nonet, P.; Selznick, P.; Kagan, R. A. Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Routledge, 2017.

Putri, S. R.; Hasan, Z. The dynamics of Lampung customary law in the social system: an empirical study of the value of Piil Pesenggiri in the Abung Siwo Mego community. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Sciences, v. 2, n. 6, p. 57-63, 2025.

Rahayu, D. P.; Ke, S. Legal research methods. Media, 2020.

Setiawan, B. P.; Prayoga, A.; Sari, D. P.; Ardian, R. The application of Piil Pesenggiri values for the younger generation in the era of globalization reviewed from the perspective of legal sociology. Sociology: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, v. 4, n. 1, p. 89-98, 2025.

Utama, F. Piil Pesenggiri in Lampung society: between instruments of peace development or the pretext of violence. Research, v. 7, n. 2, p. 117-134, 2019.

Utari, M.; Sari, I.; Wijaya, B.; Pratama, E. Piil Pesenggiri: the philosophy of life of the people of Lampung as the basis for cultural resilience in the era of globalization. Journal of School Leadership and Management, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1863-1871, 2025.

Vanderlinden, J. Return to legal pluralism: twenty years later. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, v. 21, n. 28, p. 149-157, 1989.

Von Benda-Beckmann, F. Who's afraid of legal pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, v. 34, n. 47, p. 37-82, 2002.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-05-11

Cómo citar

Jainah, Z. O., Yudistiara, D., & Triyadi, G. W. (2026). LAW AND COMMUNITY BEHAVIOR UPDATES BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM OF THE LAMPUNG INDIGENOUS TRIBE. Veredas Do Direito, 23(7), e236266. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6266