MODEL OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ONE DATA INFORMATION SYSTEM (SIMATA) POLICY BASED ON PUBLIC INNOVATION GOVERNANCE AT THE DISKOMINFO OF SOUTH SUMATRA PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6179Palabras clave:
One Data Policy, Public Innovation Governance, SIMATA, Digital Government, Data IntegrationResumen
Various problems are encountered in the implementation of SIMATA, including non-standardized data, the lack of interoperability among regional government information systems, and limited regulations governing data management. Based on these issues, this study aims to explore the actual conditions of SIMATA implementation, identify its obstacles and supporting factors, and formulate an optimal public innovation governance model to support the effective implementation of the policy. This study employs a qualitative research approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The data analysis technique used was the interactive model, which consists of data collection, data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Based on the research findings, the implementation of the One Data Information System (SIMATA) Policy based on Public Innovation Governance at the Communication and Informatics Office of South Sumatra Province has been carried out, although it still faces several constraints. Public Innovation Governance in the implementation of SIMATA in the South Sumatra Provincial Government integrates three major theoretical frameworks simultaneously: the multi-actor collaboration theory of Agranoff and McGuire, Hartley’s institutional adaptation theory, and the concept of technology utilization in digital government transformation, into a comprehensive and operational model of One Data policy implementation.
Citas
Abdurahman, M. (2017). Analysis of correlations, regression, and pathways in research. CV Pustaka Setia.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative management: New strategies for local government. Georgetown University Press.
Albert Meijer. (2015). Transparency. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability.
Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
Annika Andersson and Åke Grönlund. (2021). Improving e-government adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101540.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Antonio Cordella and Niccolò Tempini. (2015). E-government and organizational change. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–288.
Bason, C. (2024). Leading Public Sector Innovation. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447336259
Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318761797
Bhaskar Choudhuri. (2020). Determinants of smart digital infrastructure diffusion for urban public services. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6).
Borrás and Edquist. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2004). Public management and governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634219
Brown and Potoski. (2003). Managing contract performance: A transaction costs approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 275–297.
Cadarette, S. M., Bana, J. K., Consiglio, G. P., Black, C. D., Dubins, D., Marin, A., & Tadrous, M. (2017). Diffusion of model innovations helps interpret the comparative uptake of two methodological innovations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 84, 150–160.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.
Cordella and Tempini. (2015). E-government and organizational change. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–288.
Dawes, S. S. (1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 377– 394.
Derbeneva, V. V., Baskakova, I. V., Chukavina, K. V., Turgel, I. D., Novokshonova, Z. V., & Tsepeleva, A. D. (2024). Key factors in managing creative reindustrialization strategies. R-Economy, 10(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.4.029
Dunn, W. N. (2003). Introduction to public policy analysis. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding public policy. Pearson.
Edgar H. Schein. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). JosseyBass.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Erna Ruijer, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, and Albert Meijer. (2017). Open data for democracy. Information Polity, 22(2–3), 109–124.
Esther van Laar et al.. (2017). The relationship between 21st-century skills and digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
European Commission. (2017). New European Interoperability Framework. Brussels.
Frank Bannister and Regina Connolly. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119– 128.
Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2012). The public administration theory primer (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
Guziejewska, B., & Walerysiak-Grzechowska, K. (2020). A local government revenue system under macroeconomic pressure: The case of Poland. Prague Economic Papers, 29(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.728
Hans J. Scholl and Ralf Klischewski. (2007). E-government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8–9), 889–920.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2012). Human resource management (Revised edition). Bumi Aksara.
Henry, N. (2018). Public administration and public affairs (13th ed.). Routledge.
Idris, I. K. (2015). The role of government public relations in the era of public information disclosure. Paramadina Journal. http://journal.paramadina.ac.id
Ines Mergel. (2019). Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101389.
Infusion, M. Z., Kusuma, G. P., & Arham, D. A. (2022). Prediction of local government revenue using data mining method. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 12(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.46338/IJETAE0122_07
Islamy, L. O. (2018). Collaborative governance: Concepts and applications. CV Budi Utama.
Janssen, Charalabidis, and Zuiderwijk. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268.
Janssen, van der Voort, and Wahyudi. (2017). Factors influencing big data decision-making quality. Journal of Business Research, 70, 338–345.
Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R. Salancik. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. (2014). Enacting Electronic Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government-wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities, and Institutions. New York: Springer.
J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, Sharon S. Dawes, and Theresa A. Pardo. (2018). Digital government and public management research. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–644.
Kettl, D. F. (2018). Politics of the administrative process (7th ed.). CQ Press.
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2007). Public relations theory II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Klievink and Janssen. (2014). Developing multi-layer information infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 49–56.
Klievink, Bharosa, and Tan. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4).
Klievink, Romijn, Cunningham, dan de Bruijn. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 267–283.
Komarudin. (2014). Government Public Relations Reform. Genesindo.
Kuipers, Higgs, Kickert, Tummers, Grandia, and Van der Voet. (2014). The management of change in public organizations. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20.
Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public relations construction in higher education communication governance. Pekommas, 18(2).
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A fourstage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Li, W., & Li, D. (2024). Technological innovation and fiscal decentralization. Heliyon, 10(9), e30132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30132
Lember, Kattel, and Tõnurist. (2018). Technological capacity in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3).
Leonidas Anthopoulos. (2017). Smart city planning and development. Cities, 65, 97–108.
Marijn Janssen and Anneke van Veenstra. (2018). Failure of large transformation projects. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 232–241.
Marijn Janssen and Jeroen van den Hoven. (2020). Data governance for interoperability in public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493.
Martell, C. R. (2024). The impact of inflation on local government fiscal health. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 36(2), 234–252.
Mergel, Edelmann, and Haug. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.
Mergel, Ganapati, and Whitford. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161–165.
Meijer and Bolívar. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Moenir. (2006). Public service management in Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.
Moleong, L. J. (2014). Qualitative research methodology (Revised edition). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muluk, M. R. K. (Ed.). (2013). Innovative governance. UB Press.
OECD. (2020). Digital Government Policy Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
O'Leary and Vij. (2012). Collaborative Public Management: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522.
Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic. Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.
O'Toole and Meier. (2015). Public management, context, and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 237–259.
Palm, A. (2022). Innovation systems for technology diffusion. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 182, 121821.
Patrick Dunleavy et al.. (2006). Digital Era Governance. Oxford University Press.
Paul A. Sabatier. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
Pratama, A. B. (2020). Implementation of Indonesia's One Data Policy in Governance. Journal of Public Administration
Pressman and Wildavsky. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Richard Heeks. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. London: SAGE Publications.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
Ruijer and Meijer. (2020). Open government data as an innovation process. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3).
Sausi, J. M., Kitali, E. J., & Mtebe, J. S. (2021). Evaluation of local government revenue collection information system success. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(5), 437–455.
Sharon S. Dawes and Natalie Helbig. (2010). Information strategies for open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 266–272.
Solichin, A. W. (1997). Policy analysis: From formulation to implementation of state policy (2nd Edition). Bumi Aksara.
Sørensen and Torfing. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868.
Sousa, Rocha, and de Carvalho. (2022). Digital skills in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Information Polity, 27(2), 1–15.
Suharno. (2010). Fundamentals of public policy: A study of process and policy analysis. UNY Press.
Su, M. (2020). Taxation by citation? Public Administration Review, 80 (1), 36–45.
Sutopo, S. (2021). Governance Data Governance Based on One Regional Data. Journal of Government Science
Torfing and Triantafillou. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Public Management Review, 18(6), 1–17.
Torfing, Sørensen, and Røiseland. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(5), 795–825.
Torfing and Ansell. (2021). Co-creation: The new kid on the block in public governance. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 211–230.
Van der Voet, J. (2017). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4).
Van Laar et al.. (2017). Digital skills and 21st-century skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 72.
Vial. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Viswanath Venkatesh et al.. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of IT. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Wang, T., Wan, L., & Bao, H. X. H. (2024). Land-use efficiency and local government revenue. Environment and Planning B. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241272092
Wibawa, S. (1994). Public policy evaluation. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Winarno, B. (2007). Public Policy: Theory and Process. Media Pressindo.
Wirtz and Müller. (2019). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review, 21(7), 1076–1100.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
