DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5842

Palabras clave:

Digital Transformation, Firm Performance, Innovation, Manufacturing, Toe Framework

Resumen

Digital transformation is becoming a strategic priority for manufacturing firms. However, existing research often treats it as a broad phenomenon, failing to examine differences in the depth of transformation. Therefore, this study introduces the concept of Digital Transformation Degree (DTD) and develops an empirical model based on the TOE framework (Technological, Organizational, Environmental factors). Using survey data from 377 Chinese manufacturing firms and PLS-SEM analysis, the authors examined what drives DTD and how it affects innovation performance (IP) and firm performance (FP). Results show that technological and environmental factors significantly enhance DTD. However, organizational factors do not. Moreover, DTD positively influences both IP and FP, with IP partially mediating the relationship between DTD and FP. These findings highlight that not all TOE dimensions contribute equally to digital transformation, and that innovation is a key pathway through which digital depth creates organizational value. Finally, the study offers manufacturing firms practical guidance, seeking to deepen their digital transformation and convert it into measurable performance gains.

Citas

Agustian, K., Mubarok, E. S., Zen, A., Wiwin, W., & Malik, A. J. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on business models and competitive advantage. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(2), 79–93. https://journal.literasisainsnusantara.com/index.php/tacit/article/view/55

Ahmad, N., Mahmud, N., & Marmaya, N. H. (2023). Measurement model assessment: Resources, capabilities, and industrial competitiveness impact on private HEI performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16526

Akhtar, S., Tian, H., Iqbal, S., & Hussain, R. Y. (2024). Environmental regulations and government support drive green innovation performance: Role of competitive pressure and digital transformation. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(12), 4433–4453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02857-4

Alkhatib, A. W., Zaid, M., & Issa, A. (2025). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption on sustainable performance: The TOE framework perspective. Information Discovery and Delivery, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-04-2025-0076

Baker, J. (2012). The technology–organization–environment framework. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory (Vol. 28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12

Buer, S. V., Semini, M., Strandhagen, J. O., & Sgarbossa, F. (2021). The complementary effect of lean manufacturing and digitalisation on operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 59(7), 1976–1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1790684

Cenci, S., Asgharian, H., Liu, L., Rei, M., & Zollo, M. (2025). Does competitive pressure drive effective corporate environmental actions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 511, Article 145585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145585

Chen, L. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities, and innovation performance. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 11, 327–332. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i2.12632

Chen, P., & Kim, S. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on innovation performance: The mediating role of innovation factors. Heliyon, 9(3), Article e13916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13916

Chen, H., & Tian, Z. (2022). Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 139, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.048

Dai, C., & Fang, J. (2024). Digital transformation and non-financial performance in manufacturing. Sustainability, 16(12), Article 5099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125099

Daud, I. R. P. M. (2024). The effect of digital transformation on organizational performance: A meta-analysis. DiE: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 15(1), 50–65. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5df9/33a316dc18b1341b1b329c8614cbfe32e6ed.pdf

Dirgiatmo, Y. (2023). Testing the discriminant validity and heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlation (HTMT): A case in Indonesian SMEs. In W. A. Barnett & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Macroeconomic risk and growth in the Southeast Asian countries: Insight from Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-03862023000033A011

Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of digitalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 112, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004

Guo, L., & Xu, L. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212844

Li, G., & Branstetter, L. G. (2024). Does “Made in China 2025” work for China? Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Research Policy, 53(6), Article 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105009

Li, P., Chen, Y., & Guo, X. (2025). Digital transformation and supply chain resilience. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99, Article 104033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104033

Liang, S., & Li, T. (2022). Can digital transformation promote innovation performance in manufacturing enterprises? The mediating role of R&D capability. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710939

Lim, W. M. (2024). A typology of validity: Content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological, and predictive validity. Journal of Trade Science, 12(3), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-03-2024-0016

Liu, L. Q., & Li, C. Y. (2025). How does the application of artificial intelligence influence firms' ambidextrous innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms. Sustainability, 17(23), 10430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310430

López-Muñoz, J. F., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2022). Executives' role in digital transformation. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(3), 84–103. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ijispm/vol10/iss3/5/

Pimdee, P., & Leekitchwatana, P. (2022). Appropriate internet use behavior (AIUB) of Thai preservice teachers: A hierarchical linear model (HLM) analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15128a

Sarstedt, M., Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). Combined importance–performance map analysis (cIPMA) in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM): A SmartPLS 4 tutorial. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(4), 746–760. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00325-y

Shah, N., Zehri, A. W., Saraih, U. N., Abdelwahed, N. A. A., & Soomro, B. A. (2024). The role of digital technology and digital innovation towards firm performance in a digital economy. Kybernetes, 53(2), 620–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2023-0124

Shahadat, M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023). Digital technology adoption in SMEs: What technological, environmental, and organizational factors influence in emerging countries? Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199

Tian, M., Chen, Y., Tian, G., Huang, W., & Hu, C. (2023). The role of digital transformation practices in operations improvement in manufacturing firms: A practice-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108929

Wang, W., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hua, Q., & Wu, F. (2023). The impact of environmental uncertainty on ESG performance: Emotional vs. rational. Journal of Cleaner Production, 397, Article 136528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136528

Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2025). Digital transformation and innovation performance in small- and medium-sized enterprises: A systems perspective on the interplay of digital adoption, digital drive, and digital culture. Systems, 13(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010043

Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tang, Y., & Li, J. (2024). How digital transformation enhances corporate innovation performance: The mediating roles of big data capabilities and organizational agility. Heliyon, 10(14), Article e34905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34905

Yang, Y., & Yee, R. W. (2022). The effect of process digitalization initiative on firm performance: A dynamic capability development perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 254, Article 108654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108654

Zhang, Q., & Yang, M. (2023). Digital transformation, top management team heterogeneity, and corporate innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031780

Zhao, Y., Pimdee, P., & Sukkamart, A. (2026). How organizational foundations shape Chinese AI innovation performance. Veredas do Direito (in press).

Zhu, J., Baker, J. S., Song, Z., Yue, X. G., & Li, W. (2023). Government regulatory policies for digital transformation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: An evolutionary game analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02250-4

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-20

Cómo citar

Jiang, C., Pimdee, P., & Sukkamart, A. (2026). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING. Veredas Do Direito, 23(6), e235842. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5842