CASE TECHNOLOGY AS A MEANS OF FORMING RESEARCH ABILITIES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: EVIDENCE FROM HIGHER EDUCATION IN CHINA AND CENTRAL ASIA

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5654

Palabras clave:

Case Technology, Critical Thinking, Research Ability, Higher Education, China and Central Asia

Resumen

The cultivation of university students’ research ability has become a central objective of higher education reform, particularly in systems transitioning toward research- and innovation-oriented learning. This study investigates the effect of case technology on university students’ research ability and examines the mediating role of critical thinking in higher education contexts in China and Central Asia. Grounded in inquiry-based learning theory, a conceptual framework was proposed in which case technology functions as the independent variable, research ability as the dependent variable, and critical thinking as the mediating variable. A quantitative research design was employed, with data collected from 312 undergraduate students enrolled in universities in China and Kazakhstan. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and mediation analysis were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that case technology has a significant positive effect on both research ability and critical thinking. Critical thinking was also found to significantly predict research ability. Moreover, mediation analysis revealed that critical thinking partially mediates the relationship between case technology and research ability. The findings demonstrate that case technology enhances students’ research ability not only through direct engagement with research-oriented learning activities but also indirectly by fostering critical thinking. This study contributes to the literature on research-oriented pedagogy by clarifying the cognitive mechanism underlying the effectiveness of case-based instruction and provides practical implications for integrating inquiry-oriented teaching approaches in higher education curricula in China and Central Asia.

Citas

Ambasz, D., Karam, E. P., Matei, L., & Thompson, J. (2023). Towards higher education excellence in Central Asia: A roadmap for improving the quality of education and research through regional integration. World Bank.

Baimanova, L., Kunanbayeva, S., & Yessengeldina, A. (2025). Research skills and academic literacy in multilingual higher education: Evidence from Kazakhstan’s trilingual context. Education Sciences, 16(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010021

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (7th ed.). Insight Assessment.

Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Lea, J. (2014). Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. Higher Education Academy.

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.

Prince, M., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

Xiang, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2025). Effects of case-based learning on critical thinking in Chinese higher education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 25, 112.

Yermekbayeva, G., Saparova, D., & Tazhibayeva, R. (2024). Implementing research-based learning in Kazakhstan’s higher education: Effects on student research competencies. Higher Education Studies, 14(2), 45–58.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-01

Cómo citar

Ren, J., Kushchubekovna, C. A., Wang, Y., Zhu, Z., & Deng, Y. (2026). CASE TECHNOLOGY AS A MEANS OF FORMING RESEARCH ABILITIES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: EVIDENCE FROM HIGHER EDUCATION IN CHINA AND CENTRAL ASIA. Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235654. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5654