THE TRANSITION FROM AUTOMATION TO AUGMENTATION: A CONSTRAINT-AWARE FRAMEWORK FOR AGENTIC AI ADOPTION IN CORPORATE FINANCE FUNCTIONS

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5632

Palabras clave:

Agentic AI, Corporate Finance, Augmentation, Automation, Finance Transformation, AI Governance, Internal Controls, Controllership, FP&A, Auditability

Resumen

Corporate finance functions are moving through a new digital inflection point. Earlier waves of automation in finance centered on robotic process automation, rules engines, workflow tools, and predictive analytics that standardized high-volume transactions and reduced cycle times. The current wave is different because large language models, generative AI, and agentic systems can interpret unstructured data, coordinate across tools, and recommend or execute multi-step decisions. Yet the finance function cannot adopt autonomy in the same way as less regulated business areas. Financial reporting, planning, controllership, treasury, tax, internal audit, and investor-facing processes are constrained by internal controls, segregation of duties, auditability, data lineage, policy compliance, and accountability to boards, regulators, and external assurance providers. This review paper examines how the literature from 2020 to 2026 explains the shift from automation to augmentation and develops a constraint-aware framework for adopting agentic AI in corporate finance. Following a structured review and content analysis of recent academic studies, standards, and practitioner reports, the paper synthesizes four themes: the evolution of AI use cases in finance and accounting; the distinction between automation, augmentation, and bounded autonomy; the organizational and technical constraints that shape deployment; and the governance mechanisms needed for reliable value capture. The review argues that the most realistic pathway for finance is not unrestricted autonomy but graduated augmentation, in which AI agents expand analytical capacity, accelerate close and planning cycles, and improve stakeholder alignment while humans retain accountability over material judgments and irreversible actions. Building on the synthesis, the paper proposes a five-layer framework that aligns use-case selection, autonomy design, control requirements, human oversight, and performance metrics. The framework helps organizations match agentic capability to task criticality, data quality, reversibility, and regulatory exposure. The paper contributes a finance-specific conceptualization of agentic adoption, unique research objectives, an implementation sequence for CFO organizations, and a future research agenda focused on control redesign, explainability, operating models, and the changing role of finance professionals.

Citas

Abbas, K. (2025). Management accounting and artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review and recommendations for future research. The British Accounting Review.

Abdo-Salloum, A. M., & Chehade, S. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in transforming accounting and auditing practices: A systematic review. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251403296

AI Verify Foundation & Infocomm Media Development Authority. (2024). Model AI governance framework for generative AI. https://aiverifyfoundation.sg

Anh, N. T. M. (2024). The effect of technology readiness on adopting artificial intelligence by accountants. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1), Article 27.

Anwar, A. (2026). Integrating artificial intelligence in audit workflow. AI, 2(1), Article 4.

Bahoo, S., Aschfalk-Evertz, D., Hassan, M., & Kchouri, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence in finance: A comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis. SN Business & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00618-x

Ben Ahmed, D. (2026). The impact of artificial intelligence on accounting. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(1), Article 90.

Binh, N. T. T. (2025). Transforming auditing in the AI era: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Information, 16(5), Article 400.

Boston Consulting Group. (2024). Unlocking impact from AI in the finance function.

Cao, S. S. (2024). Applied AI for finance and accounting: Alternative data and opportunities. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.

Cao, Y. (2025). How AI is shaping accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review.

Deloitte. (2024, March 5). Generative AI in finance: 2023 lookback, 2024 outlook.

EY. (2025). How AI is transforming FP&A.

EY. (2026). Unlocking financial potential.

Financial Stability Board. (2024). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence. https://www.fsb.org

Infocomm Media Development Authority. (2026). Model AI governance framework for agentic AI. https://www.imda.gov.sg

Kerr, D. (2025). A review of AI and its impact on management accounting and society. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), Article 340.

Kokina, J., Blum, M., Cunningham, B., & Pickerd, J. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.

KPMG International. (2024). Global AI in finance report.

KPMG. (2025). The agentic AI advantage: Finance agents that move the numbers.

L.E.K. Consulting. (2025). A study of AI in the OCFO.

Lee, D. K. C., Lim, K. G., Low, R. K. Y., & Tan, Y. X. (2024). A comprehensive review of generative AI in finance. FinTech, 3(3), Article 25.

Lehner, O. M., Ittonen, K., Silvola, H., Ström, E., & Wührleitner, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making in accounting and auditing: Ethical challenges and normative thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 109–133.

Leocádio, D., Malheiro, L., & Reis, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in auditing: A conceptual framework for auditing practices. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), Article 238.

McKinsey & Company. (2024). McKinsey on finance, number 87.

McKinsey & Company. (2025). The state of AI: How organizations are rewiring to capture value.

Microsoft. (2025). Responsible AI transparency report.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

OpenAI. (2025). The state of enterprise AI.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in finance. https://www.oecd.org

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). The agentic AI landscape and its conceptual foundations. https://www.oecd.org

PwC. (2024). Agentic AI: The new frontier in GenAI — An executive playbook.

Taulia. (2024). The rise of AI in the finance function.

World Economic Forum & Capgemini. (2025). AI agents in action: Foundations for evaluation and governance.

World Economic Forum. (2025a). AI in action: Beyond experimentation to transform industry.

World Economic Forum. (2025b). Artificial intelligence in financial services.

World Economic Forum. (2025c). Advancing responsible AI innovation: A playbook.

Yeo, W. J., Ng, A. H. H., Lim, K. G., Poh, W. T., & Lee, D. K. C. (2025). A comprehensive review on financial explainable AI. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11077-7

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-13

Cómo citar

Jalaluddin, K. A. (2026). THE TRANSITION FROM AUTOMATION TO AUGMENTATION: A CONSTRAINT-AWARE FRAMEWORK FOR AGENTIC AI ADOPTION IN CORPORATE FINANCE FUNCTIONS. Veredas Do Direito, 23(6), e235632. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5632