LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RESILIENCE OF AGROECOLOGICAL YIELDS: A GLOBAL SYNTHESIS ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICE STABILITY AND FOOD SECURITY

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5440

Palabras clave:

Ecosystem Services, Agricultural Biodiversity, Landscape Connectivity, Yield Stability, Sustainable Agriculture

Resumen

Agricultural production systems increasingly face ecological instability driven by biodiversity loss, landscape simplification, and climate variability. While a growing body of research has examined the role of ecosystem services in supporting agricultural productivity, most studies have focused on average yield performance rather than the temporal stability of production across heterogeneous landscapes. This gap limits the understanding of how spatial landscape structure influences the resilience of agroecosystems and their capacity to sustain food production under environmental uncertainty. The main objective of this study was to synthesize global evidence on how landscape configuration influences the stability of ecosystem services and the resilience of agroecological yields. Methodologically, this study employed an integrative literature review conducted between November 2025 and February 2026 across major scientific databases. An initial set of 216 records was identified and subjected to systematic screening procedures based on explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final analytical corpus of 25 studies addressing interactions between landscape structure, biodiversity, and agricultural productivity. The results indicate that landscape heterogeneity, habitat connectivity, and the presence of semi-natural habitats significantly enhance ecosystem service provision, particularly pollination and biological pest control. These ecological processes contribute not only to increased crop productivity but also to greater yield stability across environmental fluctuations. The findings suggest that agricultural resilience is strongly influenced by the ecological structure of landscapes rather than by input-intensive production strategies alone. In conclusion, designing biodiversity-rich agricultural landscapes emerges as a key strategy for stabilizing ecosystem services and strengthening the resilience of food production systems in the context of global environmental change.

Citas

ALTIERI, Miguel A.; NICHOLLS, Clara I. Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 47, n. 5, p. 881-898, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891

ALTIERI, Miguel A.; NICHOLLS, Clara I.; HOLT-GIMÉNEZ, Eric. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, v. 35, p. 869-890, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2

BOMMARCO, Riccardo; KLEIJN, David; POTTS, Simon G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, v. 28, n. 4, p. 230-238, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012

ESTRADA-CARMONA, Natalia et al. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: implications for ecosystem services and resilience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 119, n. 38, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206117119

FAHRIG, Lenore et al. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology Letters, v. 18, n. 2, p. 127-136, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12380

GARIBALDI, Lucas A. et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, v. 339, n. 6127, p. 1608-1611, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230200

GARIBALDI, Lucas A. et al. From research to action: enhancing crop yield through wild pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, v. 12, n. 8, p. 439-447, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/130330

JEANNERET, Philippe et al. Agroecology landscapes: integrating landscape ecology into agroecosystem management. Landscape Ecology, v. 36, p. 2423-2439, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01248-0

KLEIN, Alexandra-Maria et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 274, p. 303-313, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721

KREMEN, Claire; MILES, Albie. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, v. 17, n. 4, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05035-170440

LANDIS, Douglas A. Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Basic and Applied Ecology, v. 18, p. 1-12, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.07.005

MARTIN, Emily A. et al. The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecology Letters, v. 22, n. 7, p. 1083-1094, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13265

PERFECTO, Ivette; VANDERMEER, John. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 107, n. 13, p. 5786-5791, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905455107

POTTS, Simon G. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, v. 25, n. 6, p. 345-353, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

RICKETTS, Taylor H. et al. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecology Letters, v. 11, n. 5, p. 499-515, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x

SANTOS, João S. et al. Landscape ecology in the Anthropocene: perspectives for biodiversity and agroecosystems. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, v. 6, p. 1-12, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-020-00054-7

SOUZA, Marcela Tavares de; SILVA, Michelly Dias da; CARVALHO, Rachel. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, v. 8, n. 1, p. 102-106, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134

TORRACO, Richard J. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

TSCHARNTKE, Teja et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes. Ecology Letters, v. 15, n. 9, p. 1060-1071, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01832.x

TSCHARNTKE, Teja et al. When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control. Biological Conservation, v. 204, p. 449-458, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001

TSCHARNTKE, Teja et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, v. 151, p. 53-59, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068

VANDERMEER, John; PERFECTO, Ivette. Ecological complexity and agroecology. Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661759

WILLIAMS, Neal M. et al. Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biological Conservation, v. 143, p. 2280-2291, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024

WHITTEMORE, Robin; KNAFL, Kathleen. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546-553, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

ZHANG, Wei et al. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, v. 64, n. 2, p. 253-260, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-18

Cómo citar

Ramos, P. R., Santos, C. A. B., Figueiredo Neto, A., Pereira Filho, A., Pereira, S. C., Aragão, C. A., … Beserra, E. A. (2026). LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RESILIENCE OF AGROECOLOGICAL YIELDS: A GLOBAL SYNTHESIS ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICE STABILITY AND FOOD SECURITY. Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235440. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5440