REFRAMING THE RULE OF LAW INDEX IN THE AGE OF AI AND BIG DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL STATE GOVERNANCE

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4730

Palabras clave:

Rule of Law Index, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Governance, Algorithmic Accountability, Digital Rule of Law

Resumen

Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data are rapidly transforming the architecture and operation of contemporary state governance. In this evolving context, the Rule of Law Index developed by the World Justice Project (WJP) has become a central global benchmark for assessing legal integrity and governance quality. Yet the rise of data-driven and algorithmic decision-making systems poses profound challenges to the foundational principles of the rule of law in the digital age. This article critically examines how AI reshapes core rule-of-law dimensions—transparency, accountability, procedural fairness, and the protection of fundamental rights. While AI-enabled governance promises greater efficiency, consistency, and predictive capacity, algorithmic opacity, embedded bias, and diffused responsibility risk undermining legal certainty and democratic legitimacy. To reconcile innovation with legality, the study advances an integrated legal-technological governance framework grounded in human-centred rule-of-law values. It further argues for a methodological recalibration of the Rule of Law Index to capture the structural impact of digital technologies on governance performance. Such an approach offers a normative foundation for institutional reform in Vietnam and other developing jurisdictions navigating accelerated digital transformation.

Citas

1. J Angwin, J Larson, S Mattu and L Kirchner, ‘Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And It’s Biased Against Blacks’ ProPublica (2016) https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing accessed 25 September 2025.

2. R Calo, AM Froomkin and I Kerr (eds), Robot Law (Edward Elgar 2016).

3. C Cath, S Wachter, B Mittelstadt, M Taddeo and L Floridi, ‘Artificial Intelligence and the “Good Society”: The US, EU, and UK Approach’ (2018) 24 Science and Engineering Ethics 505 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7.

4. European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)’ COM (2021) 206 final https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206 accessed 25 September 2025.

5. European Data Protection Supervisor, EDPS Guidelines on Generative AI: Embracing Opportunities, Protecting People (2024) https://www.edps.europa.eu/press-publications/press-news/press-releases/2024/edps-guidelines-generative-ai-embracing-opportunities-protecting-people_en accessed 25 September 2025.

6. Government of Canada, Directive on Automated Decision-Making (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2019) https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32592 accessed 25 September 2025.

7. A Jobin, M Ienca and E Vayena, ‘The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines’ (2019) 1(9) Nature Machine Intelligence 389 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

8. ND Minh, ‘Rule of Law Principles in the System of Principles of the Rule of Law State’ (2019) (385) State and Law J 15.

9. OECD, Open Government Data Report: Enhancing Policy Maturity for Sustainable Impact (OECD Publishing 2018) https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2018/09/open-government-data-report_g1g94eac.html accessed 25 September 2025.

10. OECD, ‘Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence’ (OECD Legal Instruments 2019) https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449 accessed 25 September 2025.

11. OECD, ‘Recommendation on Agile Regulatory Governance to Harness Innovation’ (OECD Legal Instruments 2021) https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0464 accessed 25 September 2025.

12. OECD, Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data in the Age of AI: Companion Document (OECD Publishing 2024) https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/enhancing-access-to-and-sharing-of-data-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence_23a70dca-en.html accessed 25 September 2025.

13. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending various regulations and directives (Artificial Intelligence Act) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689 accessed 25 September 2025.

14. M Scherer, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision-Making: The Wide Open? Study on the Example of International Arbitration’ (2019) Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No 318/2019 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3392669 accessed 25 September 2025.

15. NM Tuan, ‘Implementing the Rule of Law in Vietnam: Current Situation and Solutions’ (2022) (466) Legislative Research J 4.

16. DT Uc, ‘Common Values, Characteristics and Specificities of the Socialist Rule of Law State of Vietnam’ (2022) (450+451) State and Law J 14.

17. UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (UNESCO 2021) https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 accessed 25 September 2025.

18. World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index 2024 https://worldjusticeproject.org/ accessed 25 September 2025.

19. T Zarsky, ‘The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making’ (2016) 41(1) Science, Technology & Human Values 118 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-02-19

Cómo citar

Tuan, N. M. (2026). REFRAMING THE RULE OF LAW INDEX IN THE AGE OF AI AND BIG DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL STATE GOVERNANCE. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234730. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4730