CHILDREN BORN AFTER ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: EVIDENCE FROM SPEECH-LANGUAGE THERAPY PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n3.4574Palabras clave:
Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Child Development, Speech-Language Therapy, Early Regulation, Preventive MonitoringResumen
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have been increasingly used worldwide over the past decades, raising sustained interest in their potential implications for child development beyond perinatal outcomes. While medical risks associated with ART have been extensively examined, evidence regarding early functional development in real-world clinical contexts remains limited. The present study explores developmental characteristics and referral patterns among children conceived through ART in comparison with naturally conceived peers, using data derived from outpatient speech-language therapy practice. A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted on 1,661 anonymized anamnestic records collected over a six-year period through a standardized web-based questionnaire completed by caregivers prior to developmental consultation. Children were grouped according to conception method (ART versus natural conception), and descriptive statistical methods were applied to examine demographic characteristics, referral age, developmental milestones, and parent-reported clinical information. Children conceived via ART accounted for 23.2% of the sample. In both groups, referrals were most frequent between 2 and 5 years of age and showed a consistent male predominance. ART-conceived children were referred at a slightly younger age; however, no clinically meaningful differences were identified between groups in early motor, communicative, or regulatory developmental milestones. A higher proportion of positive family history of hereditary conditions was observed in the ART group. These findings indicate that ART, as a method of conception, is not independently associated with adverse early developmental outcomes and support the use of inclusive, function-oriented developmental monitoring frameworks relevant to clinical practice and public health policy.
Citas
Balayla, J. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after assisted reproductive technologies. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 129, n. 2, p. 265-272, 2017. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001837.
Barbuscia, A.; Mills, M. Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years born after ART-a longitudinal cohort study. Human Reproduction, v. 32, n. 7, p. 1482-1488, 2017. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex102.
Bergh, C.; Wennerholm, U.-B. Long-term health of children conceived after assisted reproductive technology. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, v. 125, n. 2, p. 152-157, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1729904.
Brown, R.; Harper, J. The clinical benefit and safety of current and future assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, v. 25, n. 2, p. 108-117, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.04.009.
Burgio, S. et al. Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Menopausal Review, v. 21, n. 1, p. 47-63, 2022. DOI: 10.5114/pm.2022.114404.
Catts, H. W.; Kamhi, A. G. The linguistic basis of reading disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, v. 17, n. 4, p. 329-341, 1986. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461.1704.329.
Davies, K. et al. Co-working: parents’ conception of roles in supporting their children’s speech and language development. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, v. 33, n. 2, p. 171-185, 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0265659016671169.
Deangelis, A.; Martini, A.; Owen, C. Assisted reproductive technology and epigenetics. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, v. 36, n. 3-4, p. 221-232, 2018. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675780.
Eriksson, M.; Myrberg, K. How the communicative development inventories can contribute to clinical assessments of children with speech and language disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 14, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176028.
Gardner, D. K.; Weissman, A.; Howles, C. M. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. 5. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018.
Goisis, A.; Palma, M. Medically assisted reproduction and parent-child relationships during adolescence: evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Human Reproduction, v. 36, n. 3, p. 702-711, 2021.
Goldstein, B.; Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. Bilingualism and speech sound disorders. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, v. 2, n. 3, p. 237-244, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s40474-015-0049-3.
Hann, M. et al. The growth of assisted reproductive treatment-conceived children from birth to 5 years: a national cohort study. BMC Medicine, v. 16, n. 1, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1203-7.
Iliadou, A. N.; Janson, P. C.; Cnattingius, S. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Internal Medicine, v. 270, n. 5, p. 414-420, 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02445.x.
Katagiri, Y.; Tamaki, Y. Genetic counseling prior to assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, v. 20, n. 2, p. 133-143, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12361.
Law, J. et al. Mapping practice onto theory: the speech and language practitioner’s construction of receptive language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, v. 43, n. 3, p. 245-263, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/13682820701489717.
Malinina, E. I. et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and children’s health: long-term outcomes. Vopr Ginekol Akusher Perinatol, v. 20, n. 6, p. 129-134, 2021.
Marshall, J.; Goldbart, J.; Phillips, J. Parents' and speech and language therapists' explanatory models of language development, language delay and intervention. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, v. 42, n. 5, p. 533-555, 2007. DOI: 10.1080/13682820601053753.
Monteiro, P. O. A.; Victora, C. G. Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews, v. 6, n. 2, p. 143-154, 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00183.x.
Moyle, J.; Stokes, S. F.; Klee, T. Early language delay and specific language impairment. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, v. 17, n. 2, p. 160-169, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/ddrr.1110.
Novakovic, B. et al. Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with limited epigenetic variation at birth that largely resolves by adulthood. Nature Communications, v. 10, n. 1, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11929-9.
Owen, C. M.; Segars, J. H. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, v. 27, n. 5, p. 417-428, 2009. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237430.
Pelikh, A. et al. Medically assisted reproduction treatment types and birth outcomes: a between-family and within-family analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 139, n. 2, p. 211-222, 2022. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004655.
Pennington, B. F.; Bishop, D. V. M. Relations among speech, language, and reading disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 60, n. 1, p. 283-306, 2009. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163548.
Pinborg, A.; Wennerholm, U.-B.; Bergh, C. Long-term outcomes for children conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.04.022.
Pinborg, A. et al. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, v. 95, n. 1, p. 10-15, 2015. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12799.
Pinto, F.; Schiefer, A.; Perissinoto, J. Checklist of relevant ICF categories for speech and language development. CoDAS, v. 36, n. 2, 2024. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022322en.
Riva, A. et al. Language-related skills in bilingual children with specific learning disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564047.
Rosenbluth, E. M.; Van Voorhis, B. J. Evolving role of assisted reproductive technologies. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, v. 54, n. 4, p. 734-745, 2011. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318236021d.
Rousseaux, S. (Ed.). Epigenetics and human reproduction. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
Roychoudhury, S. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants conceived by assisted reproductive technology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, v. 225, n. 3, p. 276.e1-276.e9, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.027.
Scherrer, U. et al. Systemic and pulmonary vascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Circulation, v. 125, p. 1890-1896, 2012. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071183.
Schieve, L. A. et al. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes? Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 103, n. 6, p. 1154-1163, 2004. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124571.04890.67.
Stern, J. E. et al. Accuracy of self-reported survey data on assisted reproductive technology treatment parameters and reproductive history. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, v. 215, n. 2, p. 219.e1-219.e6, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.010.
Sunderam, S. et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1-24, 2017. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6606a1.
Sutcliffe, A. G. et al. Health and development of children born after assisted reproductive technology and sub-fertility compared to naturally conceived children: data from a national study. Pediatric Reports, v. 6, n. 1, 2014. DOI: 10.4081/pr.2014.5118.
Thomas, M. S. C. Understanding delay in developmental disorders. Child Development Perspectives, v. 10, n. 2, p. 73-80, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12169.
Vrooman, L. A.; Bartolomei, M. S. Can assisted reproductive technologies cause adult-onset disease? Evidence from human and mouse. Reproductive Toxicology, v. 68, p. 72-84, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.07.015.
Zerbeto, A. B.; Zanolli, M. L.; Shon, R. ICF and perception of functioning according to children/adolescents in follow-up with speech/language disorders. CoDAS, v. 35, n. 5, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021167.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0





