ECOGROW: A LOW-COST SMART GREENHOUSE TEACHING PLATFORM FOR PROJECT-BASED ENGINEERING EDUCATION ALIGNED WITH THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n1.4094Palabras clave:
Education for Sustainable Development, Project-Based Learning, Engineering Education, Smart Greenhouse, Monitoring and Control, Sustainability EducationResumen
Engineering education increasingly faces a dual requirement: graduates must master embedded sensing, actuation, and basic control, while also developing sustainability-oriented decision-making competencies. This paper presents EcoGrow, a low-cost smart greenhouse teaching platform designed for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and project-based learning (PBL) in resource-constrained contexts. EcoGrow integrates an Arduino Mega 2560, a DHT22 temperature–humidity sensor, an I2C LCD, relay-driven actuators (12 V fan, mist pump, and lighting), and a Windows Forms (WinForms) desktop application communicating via serial for real-time monitoring, manual override, threshold configuration, and data logging. Rather than positioning EcoGrow as a novel greenhouse automation product, we frame it as a replicable teaching intervention that makes sustainability operational through measurable trade-offs (e.g., stability vs. duty cycle; humidity recovery vs. water proxy) and transparent control design choices (e.g., hysteresis, minimum on/off time). The paper contributes (i) a replicable hardware–software architecture for hands-on sustainability-oriented engineering education, (ii) a structured PBL module with explicit alignment to SDG 4, SDG 2, SDG 12, and SDG 13, and (iii) an evidence-based evaluation framework combining learning artifacts, rubric-based assessment, and log-derived indicators suitable for publishable reporting. The results from demonstration and classroom deployment show that EcoGrow reliably supports core learning outcomes in embedded systems and control, while enabling explicit sustainability reasoning grounded in data.
Citas
Achour, D., Ouammi, A., Zejli, D., & Sayadi, S. (2021). Technological progresses in modern sustainable greenhouses cultivation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 147, 111251. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111251
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the SDGs. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006
Azeiteiro, U. M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Caetano, F. J. P., & Caeiro, S. (2015). Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: Experiences from Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 308–319. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.056
Benke, K., & Tomkins, B. (2017). Future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 13(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/15487733.2017.1394054.
Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2015). Sustainability reporting in higher education: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 127–143. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.052
El-Abd, M. (2017). A review of embedded systems education in the Arduino age: Lessons learned and future directions. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(2), 79–93. doi:10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6845
Gatti, L., Ulrich, M., & Seele, P. (2019). Education for sustainable development through business simulation games: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 667–678. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.130
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Holgaard, J. E., Hadgraft, R., Kolmos, A., & Guerra, A. (2016). Strategies for education for sustainable development—Danish and Australian perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3479–3491. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.063
Jollands, M., & Parthasarathy, R. (2013). Developing engineering students’ understanding of sustainability using project based learning. Sustainability, 5(12), 5052-5066. doi:10.3390/su5125052
Kolmos, A., De Graaff, E., & Du, X. (2009). Diversity of PBL–PBL learning principles and models. In Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 9-21). Brill.. doi:10.1163/9789087909321_003
Lee, E. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effects of Arduino-based education in engineering education. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1503–1512. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1503
Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67–78. doi:10.1108/14676371111098311
Melnychenko, A., et al. (2025). Higher education as a factor to ensure human rights and sustainable development of society. Veredas do Direito, 22(2), e223473. doi:10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3473
Nhan, N. T. T. (2025). Policies ensuring equity in access to basic and higher education: Lessons from developed countries for Vietnam. Veredas do Direito, 22(5), e223834. doi:10.18623/rvd.v22.n5.3834
Pavoni, R., & Piselli, D. (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals and international environmental law: Normative value and challenges for implementation. Veredas do Direito, 13(26), 13–60. doi:10.18623/rvd.v13i26.865
Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005
Sethi, V. P., Sumathy, K., Lee, C., & Pal, D. S. (2013). Thermal modeling aspects of solar greenhouse microclimate control: A review. Solar Energy, 96, 56–82. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.06.034
Shamshiri, R. R., et al. (2018). Advances in greenhouse automation and controlled environment agriculture: A transition to plant factories and urban agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(1), 1–22. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20181101.3210
Sukackė, V., et al. (2022). Towards active evidence-based learning in engineering education: A systematic review of PBL/PjBL/CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), 13955. doi:10.3390/su142113955
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big data in smart farming—A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
Benyezza, H., Bouhedda, M., Rebouh, S., et al. (2023). A smart platform based on IoT and sensor networks for monitoring and controlling agricultural environments: A review and synthesis. Internet of Things, 23, 100830. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100830
Wood, B., & Ganago, A. (2018). Using Arduino in engineering education: Motivating students to grow from hobbyist to professional. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. doi:10.18260/1-2--31197
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
