ENHANCING SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN INDONESIA THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS (EDP) LEARNING MODEL BASED STEM APPROACH

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n7.3856

Resumen

Em meio às crescentes exigências da educação do século XXI, o desenvolvimento das competências do processo científico tornou-se uma prioridade crítica que deve ser fomentada desde cedo através de atividades pedagógicas que enfatizam a investigação, a experimentação e a prática reflexiva. Este estudo procura responder a este imperativo ao desenhar e validar empiricamente um modelo instrucional de ciências para alunos do ensino básico indonésios que incorpora a Abordagem STEM baseada em modelos de aprendizagem do Processo de Design de Engenharia (EDP). O modelo foi desenvolvido seguindo o paradigma de design instrucional de Dick e Carey e avançou por quatro fases principais, incluindo a especificação dos objetivos de aprendizagem, o desenho de um modelo instrucional STEM integrado pelo EDP e a implementação de avaliações formativas e sumativas. O julgamento dos peritos indicou um nível muito elevado de alinhamento e adequação entre dimensões de conteúdo, construção e implementação, apoiando a solidez teórica do modelo proposto. Ensaios em sala de aula envolvendo professores e alunos demonstraram que o modelo de integração de aprendizagem STEM baseado em EDP é viável de implementar e está estreitamente alinhado com as exigências da educação científica do ensino básico. Os testes de eficácia com o ttest de Amostras Independentes apresentaram um valor de significância de < 0,001, indicando uma diferença estatisticamente significativa nas pontuações de competências de processos científicos entre as classes experimental e de controlo. Estas conclusões comprovam que a Abordagem STEM baseada em modelos de aprendizagem do Processo de Projeto de Engenharia (EDP) possui forte validade teórica, praticidade louvável e eficácia substancial no aprimoramento das competências de processos científicos dos alunos do ensino básico. Ao envolver os alunos em atividades STEM orientadas para EDP, o modelo proporciona experiências autênticas de resolução de problemas que cultivam as suas capacidades de observar, formular hipóteses, desenhar investigações, analisar dados e derivar de conclusões baseadas em evidências em contextos do mundo real.

Citas

Afriani, L. (2025). Understanding the Design of Research and Development Methods in the Field of Education. 6(1), 4–8.

Aini, M., & Aini, M. (2023). Enhancing Creative Thinking and Communication Skills Through Engineering Design Process ( EDP ) Learning Model : A Case Study. 21(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i1.38022

Becker Kurt, P. K. (2011). View of Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning_ A Meta-Analysis.pdf. Journal STEM of Education.

Breiner Jonathan M., Harkness Shelly Sheats, Carla C.Johnson, & Catherone M.Koehler. (2020). What is STEM? A discussion about Conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.

Collins, S. P., Storrow, A., Liu, D., Jenkins, C. A., Miller, K. F., Kampe, C., & Butler, J. (2021). Design at Scale in a First-Year Transdisciplinary Engineering Design Course. 167–186.

Daly, C. (2014). An evaluation of the effectiveness of teamwork, with an emphasis on peer assessment and peer review, in an introductory engineering course. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 114(12), 969–978.

Deta, U. A., Prakoso, I., Agustina, P. Z. R., Fadillah, R. N., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Admoko, S., Zainuddin, A., Nurlailiyah, A., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Science Process Skills Profile of Non-Science Undergraduate Student in Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012067

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th). New York: Longmann.

Fattepur, G., Kotturshettar, B. B., Burli, S. B., & Jangali Satish, G. (2016). A Systematic Approach for the Conduct of Engineering Design Projects. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 0(0), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2016/v0i0/85522

Ghanavati, A., Dow, D. E., Frattura, R., & Ragnarsdottir, M. E. (2020). Integrating Lean Thinking into Design Thinking With First-Year Engineering Design Course. 2020 Annual Conference Northeast Section (ASEE-NE), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEENE51624.2020.9292647

Gizaw, G. G., & Sota, S. S. (2023). Improving Science Process Skills of Students: A Review of Literature. Science Education International, 34(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5

Hambali, H. (2024). Keterampilan Proses Sains untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Sekolah Dasar. 3(2), 85–95.

Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044

Harlen, W., & Jelly, S. (1990). Developing Science in the Primary Classroom. Penguin Random House.

Herda, A., Johari, A., Maison, Rusdi, M., & Asyhar, R. (2020). Science process skill ability level of senior high school students in learning chemistry in jambi. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1829–1833.

Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between Scientific Attitudes and Science Process Skills toward Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. 8(March), 1–16.

Kemendikbud Ristek. (2020). Jenis Keterampilan Proses Sains).

Kline, W. A., & Schindel, W. D. (2017). Engineering design, a shift from a process to a model-based view. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190508

Leli Kartika, I. W. D. (2022). SCIENTIFIC APPROACH-BASED STUDENT WORKSHEET TO IMPROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENT ’ S SCIENTIFIC. 05(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i2.13779

Metz, S., Metz, S., Stuckey, S., Lu, K., Roberts, K. L., Jonas, L., Thomas, W., Butera, J., Bichali, H., Thompson, B., Lorrain, C., Parker, J., Beacom, D., Evans, D. L., & Sheldrake, J. (2014). Editor’s Corner: Engineering a New World. The Science Teacher, 81(9), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst14_081_09_6

Novitra, F. (2021). Development of Online-based Inquiry Learning Model to Improve 21st-Century Skills of Physics Students in Senior High School. 17(22).

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: a detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y

Sale, D. (2020). Framing a Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century Competencies BT - Creative Teachers: Self-directed Learners (D. Sale (ed.); pp. 243–262). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3469-0_7

Siagian, S. (2014). Development of Interactive Multimedia Learning in Learning Instructional Design. 5(32), 44–51.

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653

Su, M. (2025). Practical Research on Interdisciplinary Integrated Teaching in Improving Students’ Comprehensive Abilities. 1(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.64229/ggjvfd69

Sukarelawan, M. I., Indratno, T. K., & Ayu, S. M. (2024). N-gain vs stacking.

Sutisnawati, A., Rahmawati, Y., Sumantri, M. S., & Lestari, I. (2025). EduBasic Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar A Review of Integration of Engineering Design Process ( EDP ) Learning Model through STEM Approach in Elementary Schools. 7(1), 129–145.

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Williams, J. P. (2011). STEM Education : Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 26–35.

Wind, S. A., Alemdar, M., Lingle, J. A., Gale, J. D., & Moore, R. A. (2017). Developing an Engineering Design Process Assessment using Mixed Methods. Journal of Applied Measurement, 18(2), 100–121.

Zamista, A. A. (2018). Increasing Persistence of Collage Students in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematic (STEM). Curricula, 3(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i1.1308

Descargas

Publicado

2025-12-18

Cómo citar

Sutisnawati, A., Rahmawati, Y., & Sumantri, M. S. (2025). ENHANCING SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN INDONESIA THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS (EDP) LEARNING MODEL BASED STEM APPROACH. Veredas Do Direito, 22, e223856. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n7.3856