LEGAL TECHNOLOGY AS A NEW FIELD OF LEGAL RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n3.3399Palabras clave:
Legal Technology, Legal Database, Legaltech, Lawtech, Regtech, Legislative TechniquesResumen
In the contemporary era, the rapid advancement of science and technology, along with the ongoing digital transformation, has exerted a profound influence across all domains of social life, including the legal sciences. Legal technology (LegalTech) is a relatively new concept that has been conceptualized and interpreted in various ways within academic and professional discourse. This article explores several theoretical and practical approaches to legal technology, analyzes its positive impacts as well as potential risks to legal science, and, on that basis, proposes policy and research implications for Vietnam. The integration of technology into legal systems represents a paradigm shift in how law is practiced, interpreted, and even created. LegalTech encompasses a wide range of technological tools and methodologies designed to automate, optimize, and innovate legal processes. These include data analytics for case prediction, natural language processing for legal document review, blockchain-based smart contracts, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems used to support judicial decision-making. In a broader sense, legal technology not only serves as a mechanism for efficiency but also functions as a transformative force that challenges traditional notions of legal reasoning, professional ethics, and human agency in the administration of justice (Susskind, 2019). The global expansion of LegalTech has been accelerated by the increasing demand for access to justice, transparency, and cost efficiency in legal services. In many countries, especially those undergoing digital transformation, LegalTech has become a cornerstone of reform efforts aimed at simplifying procedures, improving public trust in legal institutions, and facilitating international integration (Vinogradova, 2023). For example, the United States and the United Kingdom have witnessed the proliferation of automated legal advice platforms and online dispute resolution systems, while civil law jurisdictions such as Russia and Vietnam are exploring the digitization of normative legal acts and the potential use of AI in legislative drafting. However, the emergence of LegalTech also raises important theoretical and ethical questions. Scholars debate whether the increasing reliance on AI could undermine core legal principles such as fairness, accountability, and due process (Surden, 2020). Algorithmic decision-making, while efficient, may lack transparency and be vulnerable to bias, particularly when trained on incomplete or unbalanced data sets. Moreover, the introduction of LegalTech disrupts traditional legal education and professional formation, requiring future jurists to acquire interdisciplinary skills in technology, data management, and cybersecurity. In Vietnam, LegalTech remains an underexplored but promising field. The country’s growing emphasis on e-governance and digital transformation provides a favorable environment for its development. Nevertheless, challenges persist in areas such as fragmented legal databases, limited institutional capacity, and the need for clear regulatory frameworks governing the ethical and technical standards of LegalTech applications. Against this backdrop, this paper argues that Vietnam should adopt a strategic approach that combines comparative research, institutional capacity-building, and legislative modernization. By examining the experiences of countries such as Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Brazil, and the United States, this study highlights both the opportunities and challenges of integrating technology into legal processes. Legal technology, if developed responsibly, can enhance the coherence, transparency, and accessibility of the legal system. Yet it simultaneously demands careful policy design, interdisciplinary research collaboration, and ongoing public oversight to ensure that the human dimension of law is not lost in the pursuit of technological progress.
Citas
Dai, S. (2020, April 1). Shanghai judicial courts start to replace clerks with AI assistants. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/tech/innovation/article/3077979/shanghai-judicial-courts-start-replace-clerks-ai-assistants
De la Vega, C. (2022). Comparative perspectives on legal technology and access to justice. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac012
De Sanctis, F. M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Innovation in Brazilian Justice. International Annals of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2021.4
Dev By Media. (2019). Chatbot DoNotPay automates the filing of lawsuits against hacked companies. https://dev.by/news/donotpay-automates-data-theft-protection
Đinh, T. V. (2021). Legal informatics and the modernization of lawmaking in Vietnam. Vietnamese Journal of Legal Studies, 12(3), 45–57.
Federal Notarial Chamber of the Russian Federation. (2024). Reliable storage, accurate verification, and online notary assistance: 9 years of the Unified Information System of the Notariat. https://notariat.ru/ru-ru/news/nadezhnoe-hranilishe-tochnye-proverki-i-pomosh-notariusa-onlajn-9-let-eis-notariata-2307/
House of Lords Library. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Public Policy: Accountability, transparency, and ethics. London: UK Parliament.
Mak, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Lawmaking: Challenges and opportunities for legislative processes. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 15(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00177-9
Nguyễn, V. T., & Phạm, T. L. (2022). Systematization of normative legal documents in Vietnam: Challenges and directions for reform. Journal of Legislative Studies, 28(4), 215–230.
PDPC (Personal Data Protection Commission). (2019). Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition). Singapore: PDPC. https://www.pdpc.gov.sg
Qian, H. (2019). Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations. Sustainability, 11(4), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041015
Surden, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 36(4), 1305–1339.
Susskind, R. (2019). Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
UAE Ministry of Artificial Intelligence. (2017). UAE Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2031. Abu Dhabi: UAE Government.
World Bank. (2023). Digital Transformation and Legal Modernization: Global Governance Report 2023. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Виноградова, Е. В. (2023). Информационные инструменты в праве LegalTech, LawTech и RegTech. Журнал Правовая политика и правовая жизнь, 1(2023), 14–20.
Дорофеева, М. А., Самусенко, Т. М., & Гонгорова, Д. В. (2024). Новое будущее для юридической профессии: вызовы и возможности LegalTech. Журнал Правовая политика и правовая жизнь, 3(2024), 337–346.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0





