COMPARATIVE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF CYLINDRICAL AND RECTANGULAR OIL TANKS: EFFECTS OF WALL THICKNESS UNDER SOIL–STRUCTURE–FLUID INTERACTION

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3224

Palabras clave:

Seismic Response, Tank Geometry, Cylindrical Tank, Rectangular Tank, Wall Thickness, Soil–Structure–Fluid Interaction, Dynamic Analysis

Resumen

Oil and liquid storage tanks represent essential components of industrial infrastructure, guaranteeing the secure containment of petroleum, chemical, and other hazardous liquids. Their seismic performance plays a crucial role in mitigating risks of leakage, structural collapse, and environmental contamination [1,2]. While most existing research has concentrated on cylindrical storage tanks—the predominant configuration in industry—rectangular tanks are also employed in specific applications, yet their seismic behavior remains insufficiently explored [5]. This study presents a comparative numerical analysis of the seismic response of cylindrical and rectangular oil tanks, incorporating full soil–structure–fluid interaction and accounting for the influence of wall thickness [5,7]. Three-dimensional finite element models are developed in ADINA using a coupled Lagrangian formulation for the fluid domain [6], and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (Taiwan) is applied as ground motion input [10]. The analysis evaluates variations in tensile stresses, hydrodynamic pressures, and fluid velocity distributions across different wall thicknesses [8]. Results demonstrate the significant impact of tank geometry and wall stiffness on dynamic behavior and provide design recommendations for safer tank configurations in seismically active regions [5,7].

Citas

[1] Housner, G.W. (1963). The dynamic behaviour of water tanks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53(2), 381–387.

[2] Reese, S.C., & Elms, D.G. (1973). Seismic design of liquid storage tanks. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 99(7), 1439–1456.

[3] Chopra, A.K. (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

[4] Veletsos, A.S., & Tang, Y. (1990). Seismic response of liquid storage tanks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 19(4), 553–573.

[5] Bhowmick, S., & Jain, A. (2015). Seismic performance of cylindrical and rectangular tanks considering soil–structure–fluid interaction. Engineering Structures, 102, 1–12.

[6] ADINA R&D, Inc. (2020). ADINA Theory and Modeling Guide. Watertown, MA, USA.

[7] Kumar, A., & Gupta, S. (2018). Influence of wall thickness on seismic response of liquid storage tanks. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(12), 1463–1475.

[8] Liu, P., & Chopra, A.K. (1993). Hydrodynamic pressures in rectangular tanks under seismic excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119(5), 963–981.

[9] Lee, D., & Huang, H. (2003). Dynamic response of rectangular liquid storage tanks on flexible foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23(8), 673–683.

[10] Central Weather Bureau, Taiwan. (1999). Seismic records of Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake.

[11] Pecker, A. (1984). Dynamique Des Sol. Presses de l'École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.

[12] Bard, P. (1988). The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—A Theoretical Investigation of Large- and Small-scale Amplification Effects in the Mexico City Valley.

[13] Bard, P.Y., Afra, H., & Argoul, P. (n.d.). Recent advances in earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Dynamic behavior of buildings: experimental results from strong motion data, V. Davidovici. Ouest Editions.

[14] Chavez-Garcia, F. (1991). Thèse de doctorat de l'Université J. Fourier. Diffraction et amplification des ondes sismiques dans le bassin de Mexico, Grenoble, France.

[15] Goulmot, D. (2012). Nouvelles Méthodes numériques pour l'analyse sismique des réservoirs de liquide : Effets de l'asymétrie, du Ballotement en surface libre et de blocs glace en flottaison. Mémoire présenté en vue de l'obtention du diplôme de maîtrise ès sciences appliquées. Montréal: Université de Montréal.

[16] Gazetas, G., & Mylonakis, G. (1998). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III volume 2. Seismic soil-structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues.

[17] Housner, G.W. (1957). Selected Earthquake Engineering Papers of George W. Housner. American Society of Civil Engineers.

[18] Guéguen, P. (1995). Rapport de Interaction entre le bâti existant et le mouvement du sol dans les sites urbains. France.

[19] Semblat, J.F., Duval, A.M., & Dangla, P. (1999). Amplification du mouvement sismique effets de site dans le centre de Nice.

[20] Wolf, J.P. (1985). Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction.

[21] Kham, M. (2005). Basin geometry vs soil layering. Seismic wave amplification.

[22] Boudjellal, E.-M. (2018). Analyse Sismique Des Réservoirs (Thèse Doctorat). Faculté de Technologie, Batna: Université Batna2.

[23] Erlingson, S. (1999). Oil Dyn. and. Three-dimensional dynamic soil analysis of a live load in Ullewi Stadium.

[24] Erlingson, S., & Bodare, S. (1996). Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engineering. Live load induced vibrations in Ullevi Stadium-Dynamic soil analysis.

[25] Sieffert, J.-G., & Cevaer, F. (1992). Manuel des fonctions d'impédance, fondations superficielles. Ouest Éditions, Presses Académiques, France.

[26] Wirgin, A., et al. (1996). Proceedings Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. A note on the seismic wavefield radiated from large building structures into soft soils.

[27] Wong, H.L., & Luco, J.E. (1976). Dynamic response of rigid foundations of arbitrary shape. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 4:587–97.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-10-09

Cómo citar

Bouchehit, H., Torkia, H., Kadid, A., & Benfrid, A. (2025). COMPARATIVE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF CYLINDRICAL AND RECTANGULAR OIL TANKS: EFFECTS OF WALL THICKNESS UNDER SOIL–STRUCTURE–FLUID INTERACTION. Veredas Do Direito, 22, e3224. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3224