PROXİMİTY INDEX VALUE FOR SUPPLİER SELECTİON USİNG COMPROMİSE WEİGHTİNG OF ANALYTİCAL HİERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) AND MEREC: A CASE STUDY IN INDONESIAN LEATHER INDUSTRY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6542Palavras-chave:
Supplier Selection, MEREC, AHP, PIV, DelphiResumo
This study addresses supplier selection challenges by proposing a model that uses the Proximity Index Value (PIV) using compromise criteria weighting of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). Delphi is applied in the proposed model on criteria selection, accommodating all objective and subjective criteria. The model was then tested practically at a leather company in Indonesia. Our model effectively captures the dynamics of decision-making groups in supplier ranking, emphasizing the importance of criteria selection in making better decisions. Notably, the robustness of our method is demonstrated by its insensitivity to parameter changes, ensuring efficient results.
Referências
Ahmad, F., Shamayleh, A., Daghfous, A., Khatib, I. A., Salloum, G. A., & Elabed, S. (2024). Healthcare supply chain disruption risks. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 17(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0570427
Akbaş, S., & Erbay Dalkiliç, T. (2018). Multi-criteria supplier selection based on fuzzy pairwise comparison in AHP. Gazi University Journal of Science, 31(1), 296–308.
Alfares, H. K., & Duffuaa, S. O. (2016). Simulation-based evaluation of criteria rank-weighting methods in multi-criteria decision-making. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 15(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622015500315
Ali, M. R., Nipu, S. M. A., & Khan, S. A. (2023). A decision support system for classifying supplier selection criteria using machine learning and random forest approach. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, Article 100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100238
Ayan, B., Abacıoğlu, S., & Basilio, M. P. (2023). A comprehensive review of the novel weighting methods for multi-criteria decision-making. Information, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050285
Bag, S., Sabbir Rahman, M., Choi, T. M., Srivastava, G., Kilbourn, P., & Pisa, N. (2023). How COVID-19 pandemic has shaped buyer-supplier relationships in engineering companies with ethical perception considerations: A multi-methodological study. Journal of Business Research, 158, Article 113598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113598
Bingol, S. (2022). Selection of semiconductor packaging materials by combined fuzzy AHP-entropy and proximity index value method. Genetics Research, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7901861
Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621381
Cafiso, S., Di Graziano, A., & Pappalardo, G. (2013). Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Safety Science, 57, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001
Çalışkan, H., Kursuncu, B., Kurbanogˏlu, C., & Güven, S. Y. (2013). Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods (pp. 473–479). [Publisher not identified].
Chai, J., Liu, J. N. K., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040
Cheng, R., Fan, J., & Wui, F. (2023). A dynamic multi-attribute group decision-making method with R-numbers based on MEREC and CoCoSo method. Complex and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01032-4
Chu, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061
Das, P. P., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). A comparative assessment of multicriteria parametric optimization methods for plasma arc cutting processes. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, Article 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100190
Debnath, B., Bari, A. B. M. M., Haq, M. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). An integrated stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis and weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for sustainable supplier selection in the healthcare supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 1, Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2022.100001
Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M. (2023). An integrated analytic hierarchy process and complex proportional assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, Article 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155
Douaioui, K., Oucheikh, R., & Benmoussa, O. (2024). Optimizing procurement strategies for diverse product segments: A case study in pharmaceutical supply chain management. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 17(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0570425
Dožić, S., Babić, D., Kalić, M., & Živojinović, S. (2023). An AHP approach to airport choice by freight forwarder. Sustainable Futures, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100106
Dožić, S., & Kalić, M. (2015). Comparison of two MCDM methodologies in aircraft type selection problem. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.044
Drumm, S., Bradley, C., & Moriarty, F. (2022). ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2230–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027
Ecer, F., & Aycin, E. (2023). Novel comprehensive MEREC weighting-based score aggregation model for measuring innovation performance: The case of G7 countries. Informatica, 34(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.15388/22-INFOR494
Ecer, F., & Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2022). Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: Case of OPEC countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(4), 1158–1181. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17152
Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690
Ginevičius, R. (2011). A new determining method for the criteria weight in multicriteria evaluation. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 1067–1095. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004713
Goswami, S. S., Mohanty, S. K., & Behera, D. K. (2022). Selection of a green renewable energy source in India with the help of MEREC integrated PIV MCDM tool. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52, 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.019
Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 136, 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.038
Hue, T. T., & Oanh, N. K. (2023). Antecedents of green brand equity: Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 403, Article 136895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136895
Kabak, M., & Oztek, G. (2022). A multi-criteria approach to sustainable risk management of supplier portfolio: A case study at defense industry. Gazi University Journal of Science, 35(4), 1504–1519. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.883894
Kaya, S. K., Ayçin, E., & Pamucar, D. (2023). Evaluation of social factors within the circular economy concept for European countries. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 31(1), 73–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00800-w
Keleş, N. (2023). Measuring performances through multiplicative functions by modifying the MEREC method: MEREC-G and MEREC-H. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 5(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijieom-12-2022-0068
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
Khan, N. Z., Ansari, T. S. A., Siddiquee, A. N., & Khan, Z. A. (2019). Selection of e-learning websites using a novel proximity indexed value (PIV) MCDM method. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00135-7
Koskey, K. L. K., May, T. A., Fan, Y. K., Bright, D., Stone, G., Matney, G., & Bostic, J. D. (2023). Flip it: An exploratory (versus explanatory) sequential mixed methods design using Delphi and differential item functioning to evaluate item bias. Methods in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100117
Kumar Behera, D., & Beura, S. (2023). Supplier selection for an industry using MCDM techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings, 74, 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.291
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., & Raupach, T. (2023). Delphi study for the development and preliminary validation of an item set for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100126
Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Hezam, I. M., Shrivastava, R., & Smarandache, F. (2022). An integrated decision support framework using single-valued-MEREC-MULTIMOORA for low carbon tourism strategy assessment. IEEE Access, 10, 24411–24432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3155171
Moradian, M., Modanloo, V., & Aghaiee, S. (2019). Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 6(5), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2018.02.001
Mufazzal, S., & Muzakkir, S. M. (2018). A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 119, 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.045
Mukhametzyanov, I. Z. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC, SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 76–105. https://doi.org/10.31181/DMAME210402076I
Nazim, M., Wali Mohammad, C., & Sadiq, M. (2022). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(12), 10851–10870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.005
Ristono, A. (2019). New method of criteria weighting for supplier selection. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 87(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-03.42
Ristono, A., Pratikto, Santoso, P. B., & Tama, I. P. (2018a). A literature review of criteria selection in supplier. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2203
Ristono, A., Pratikto, Santoso, P. B., & Tama, I. P. (2018b). Modified AHP to select new suppliers in the Indonesian steel pipe industry. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(12), 3894–3907.
Ristono, A., Wahyuningsih, T., & Junianto, E. (2020). Proposed method for supplier selection. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 13, 376–394. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v13i1.1955
Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3–4), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5
Secundo, G., Magarielli, D., Esposito, E., & Passiante, G. (2017). Supporting decision-making in service supplier selection using a hybrid fuzzy extended AHP approach: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23(1), 196–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2016-0013
Shanmugasundar, G., Sapkota, G., Čep, R., & Kalita, K. (2022). Application of MEREC in multi-criteria selection of optimal spray-painting robot. Processes, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061172
Vladimirovna Kochkina, M., Nikolaevich Karamyshev, A., Gennadevich Isavnin, A., Iljazovich Makhmutov, I., & Kurtovich Rozencvajg, A. (2017). Modified multi-criteria decision making method development based on "AHP" and "TOPSIS" methods using probabilistic interval estimates. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, December, 1663–1674. http://tojdac.org/tojdac/VOLUME7-DCMSPCL_files/tojdac_v070DSE144.pdf
Wahyuningsih, T., Ristono, A., Muhsin, A., Kasih, P. H., & Rosalina, J. (2023). Breaking the raw material bottleneck: How SWARA-ARAS method streamlined production for PT. Adi Satria Abadi (Vol. 1). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-048-0_3
Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2016). Multi-criteria supplier selection using analytical hierarchy process approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-06-2014-0052
Yahya, S. M., Asjad, M., & Khan, Z. A. (2019). Multi-response optimization of TiO2/EG-water nano-coolant using entropy based preference indexed value (PIV) method. Materials Research Express, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab23bb
Zavadskas, E. K., & Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 15(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500036
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
