SECTION THREE: GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKS AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFORTS FOR INTERNATIONAL FINANCING MECHANISMS IN FRAGILE HUMANITARIAN ENVIRONMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6356Palavras-chave:
Humanitarian Finance, Corporate Governance, Humanitarian Response, Multi-Stakeholder Trust Funds, Fragile EnvironmentsResumo
This study addresses governance policies and institutional efforts because they aim to coordinate the tasks of international financing instruments in the context of fragile humanitarian environments and complex problems arising from wars, insecurity, and the multiplicity of international actors. In this context, multi-partner trust funds in the United Nations system stand out as a contemporary icon of participatory financing, working to achieve a higher level of quality and strengthen relationships in organizing financial resources that determine humanitarian responses. The research study aims to highlight the impact of the governance policies of these funds on the arrangement of tasks, decision-making procedures, and the determination of funding objectives through an organizational structure that organizes the executive and donor agencies, which supports the provision of resources for emergencies. In addition, it enhances the confidence of funding bodies and supports the quality of the agreement through the principles of transparency and accountability. However, these governance practices are exposed to obstacles associated with administrative bureaucracy and the differing interests of the participating parties.
Referências
1. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Annual report 2024. Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office.
2. OECD. (2023). Financing humanitarian assistance and pooled funding mechanisms. OECD Publishing.
3. United Nations Development Group. (2019). Guidance note on Multi-Partner Trust Funds.
4. MPTF Office. (2022). Governance framework and accountability structure.
5. Muhammad Wahid Hassan Alaa. (2020). Sustainable development: An analytical study. University of Mosul Journal, (8).
6. United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Administrative agent protocol.
7. OCHA. (2022). Global guidelines for country-based pooled funds (CBPF).
8. Abdul Rahman Al-Hiti. (2015). Sustainable development (1st ed.). Al-Maaref Establishment.
9. UN Board of Auditors. (2023). Audit of Multi-Partner Trust Funds.
10. World Bank. (2020). Trust fund management and results-based financing.
11. OCHA. (2021a). Humanitarian financing in fragile contexts.
12. United Nations Development Programme. (2022a). Transparency and risk management in pooled funds.
13. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (2021). Localization and humanitarian governance.
14. United Nations. (2020a). Funding mechanisms and local ownership in crisis settings.
15. Suad Khudair Muhammad. (2025). The effectiveness of the United Nations (Habitat) program in the sustainability of human settlements: Iraq as a model [Master’s thesis, University of Mosul].
16. Muhammad Khalaf Ramadan. (2025). The right of peoples to good governance: A study in international human rights law [Master’s thesis, University of Mosul].
17. Emad Mohamed Abdel Mohammadi. (2017). Legal protection of the environment (1st ed.). Dār Al-Jāmiʼa Al-Jadīda.
18. Muhammad Yunus Yahya Al-Saigh. (2005). The legal status of private foreign investments in developing countries under international financial law [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mosul].
19. OCHA. (2022a). Iraq humanitarian fund operational overview. United Nations in Iraq.
20. OCHA. (2021b). Iraq humanitarian fund annual report 2021.
21. OCHA. (2023a). Iraq humanitarian fund annual report 2022.
22. OCHA. (2021c). IHF 2020 annual report (p. 51).
23. OCHA. (2022b). Yemen humanitarian fund – operational manual.
24. OCHA. (2023b). Yemen humanitarian fund annual report 2022.
25. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2022). Overview of the Yemen humanitarian fund 2021.
26. Yemen Humanitarian Fund. (2021). Annual report 2021.
27. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2021a). Risk management framework for country-based pooled funds.
28. Yemen Humanitarian Fund. (2020). Final report 2020.
29. OCHA. (2022c). South Sudan humanitarian fund: Operational manual and annual report 2022.
30. United Nations. (2021). Financing humanitarian response in high-risk environments.
31. OCHA. (2023c). Yemen humanitarian fund annual report 2022.
32. OCHA. (2023d). South Sudan humanitarian fund annual report 2022.
33. OCHA. (2021d). SSHF reserve allocation strategy.
34. UN Board of Auditors. (2023). Audit of country-based pooled funds.
35. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2021b). Country-based pooled funds: Global guidelines.
36. OCHA. (2020). Localization performance report – South Sudan: Annual report 2020.
37. OCHA. (2024). Syria humanitarian fund operational manual.
38. OCHA. (2023e). Syria humanitarian fund annual report 2022.
39. OCHA. (2021e). Cross-border humanitarian financing mechanisms for Syria.
40. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2023). Country-based pooled funds: Global guidelines.
41. OCHA. (2020). Coordination and allocation effectiveness review – SHF.
42. OCHA. (2021f). Localization strategy – Syria context.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Submeto (emos) o presente trabalho, texto original e inédito, de minha (nossa) autoria, à avaliação de Veredas do Direito - Revista de Direito, e concordo (amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Revista Veredas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, dissociado de Veredas do Direito, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto ao Editor-gerente. Declaro (amos) ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado, o (s) autor (es) e empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
Reconheço (Reconhecemos) ainda que Veredas está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS:
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
