SEABORNE SURVEILLANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: POSSIBLE DIRECTIONS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW OF THE SEA

Authors

  • Ban Sabah Jarallah University of Diyala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5413

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Maritime Observation, UNCLOS, International Maritime Law, Governance, Accountability, Ethics

Abstract

Challenges to maritime security are a global challenge. Piracy, illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, smuggling, maritime terrorism, and environmental crime create instability relations to the high seas and to the governance and use of oceans. Traditional means of surveillance, such as radar, coastal patrol and the Automatic Identification System (AIS) lack the capacity to deal with the transnational and complex modern maritime threats. New developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) such as machine learning, computer vision, predictive analytics, and autonomous unmanned systems offer a pathway to enhance maritime surveillance and to enforce the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The proposed research will investigate the intersection of technological innovation and global ocean law, as a empirical investigation of the use of applications of AI technology in maritime security surveillance, how they fit within the UNCLOS regime, and the legal, technical and ethical challenges posed by these technologies. The research will examine cases studies drawn from the European Union, United States, Asia-Pacific, Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Guinea, and Arctic, and will comparative analysis across multiple types of governance that range from institutionalized and legal to security, cooperative, and dependency-based. AI facilitates the capacity of states to take action to implement UNCLOS provisions by proactive action, enhanced environmental surveillance, and improved search and rescue. Discussions around accountability, liability, jurisdiction, and algorithmic bias call for the establishment of a global regulatory framework urgently. The research identified key gaps in respect to accountability mechanism, regional variations, and ethics, and corresponds them to the proposal for harmonized legal-tech framework and an AI Accountability Protocol through the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The research makes both theoretical and practical contributions. From the perspective of theoretical contribution, this work adds to the literature by situating AI within a hybrid governance model of law, technology and ethics. From the practical contribution perspective, the work provides concrete recommendations for policymakers and international institutions, including capacity building for states with developing capabilities, data standardization, explainable AI models, and surveillance coalitions. Incorporating the technical capacity with the ability to be enforced in law demonstrated that AI can be a fit foundational building block for 21st century maritime governance-increasing compliance with international law while making global maritime commons as safer, sustainable and fairer.

References

Bryson, J. (2019). The past decade and future of AI’s impact on society. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 65, 1–12.

Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2021). Blue crime: Conceptualising transnational organised crime at sea. Marine Policy, 132, 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104685

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

EMSA. (2021). Annual report on maritime surveillance and CleanSeaNet. European Maritime Safety Agency. https://emsa.europa.eu

FAO. (2009). Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics and the governance of the digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9

Galdorisi, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve maritime search and rescue. Journal of Navigation, 73(6), 1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463319000862

Global Fishing Watch. (2020). Artificial intelligence in support of sustainable fisheries. Retrieved from https://globalfishingwatch.org

IMO. (1973/1978). International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). International Maritime Organization.

IMO. (2019). The International Maritime Organization’s role in maritime security. IMO Publications.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Klein, N. (2019). Maritime security and the law of the sea: Unresolved issues. Ocean Development & International Law, 50(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2019.1605677

Lima, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence, accountability and maritime law enforcement. AI & Society, 37(4), 1401–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01167-3

Miller, N. A., Roan, A., Hochberg, T., Amos, J., & Kroodsma, D. A. (2018). Identifying global patterns of transshipment behavior. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00240

OECD. (2021). Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org

Park, J., & Lee, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in maritime domain awareness: A review. Marine Policy, 131, 104546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104546

Pramono, T. (2019). Indonesia’s experience in combating IUU fishing through transparency and technology. Marine Policy, 108, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103610

Sullivan, J. (2020). Cybersecurity risks in AI-enabled maritime systems. Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00196-y

Tanaka, Y. (2019). The International Law of the Sea (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553562

UNCLOS. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Montego Bay, Jamaica: United Nations.

UNODC. (2020). Transnational organized crime at sea: The invisible wave. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org

United Nations. (2020). World ocean assessment report. Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea.

USCG. (2018). Unmanned aircraft systems strategy. United States Coast Guard, Washington, D.C.

Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2020). Advances in AI applications for maritime surveillance. IEEE Access, 8, 145234–145246. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015170

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Jarallah, B. S. (2026). SEABORNE SURVEILLANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: POSSIBLE DIRECTIONS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW OF THE SEA. Veredas Do Direito, 23(5), e235413. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5413