ENTRE LA CALIDAD EDUCATIVA Y EL FUTURO PROFESIONAL: EXPECTATIVAS ESTUDIANTILES EN LA EDUCACIÓN TÉCNICA PÚBLICA DE TRUJILLO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.5005Keywords:
Calidad Educativa Percibida, Gobernanza Institucional, Expectativas de Inserción LaboralAbstract
Estudio cuantitativo, transversal, en EFTP pública de Trujillo (2024) con 145 estudiantes (mediana 24 años; 67.6% mujeres). El instrumento mostró alta fiabilidad (α=0.838–0.940) y validez convergente (CR≈0.89–0.96, AVE≈0.68–0.84). Descriptivamente, Motivación fue alta (G=4.28, IC95% 4.13–4.44) y Inserción favorable (I=4.15, IC95% 3.99–4.31); Calidad global quedó levemente por debajo del umbral deseable (F=3.87, IC95% 3.71–4.02). En la regresión ordinal (I en 5 niveles), Gobernanza/gestión (H) fue el predictor decisivo (OR=16.10, IC95% 6.41–40.45; p<0.001), robusto al dicotomizar (I≥4) y por subgrupos. El análisis confirmatorio por compuestos indicó β estand. Calidad→Expectativas = −0.268 (IC95% −0.427, −0.109; p=0.001; R²=0.072), sugiriendo revisar orientación de escalas y no linealidades. Conclusión: simplificar procesos, estandarizar reglas y asegurar tiempos de respuesta (gobernanza) elevaría expectativas; elevar F alinearía la evaluación integral con los niveles ya altos de G e I, aportando métricas accionables para la gestión y una agenda de evaluación futura.
References
Arrieta, M. del C., & Avolio, B. (2020). Factors of higher education quality service: The case of a Peruvian university. Quality Assurance in Education, 28(4), 219–238.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2023). Best practices for survey research (10th ed.). https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Survey-Best-Practices.pdf
Amado, M., Guzmán, A., & Juarez, F. (2023). Relationship between perceived value, student experience, and university reputation: Structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 780. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02272-y
Ayanwale, M. A., et al. (2023). Modelling secondary school students’ attitudes toward TVET. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291123000839
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement with digital technologies in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103798.
Busso, M., et al. (2024). The unintended consequences of merit-based teacher selection: Evidence from a large-scale reform in Colombia. Journal of Public Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272724001749
Chen, Q., Chen, N., & Yang, Y. (2023). The impact of college students’ perceived service quality in the context of regional integration of education. SAGE Open, 13(3), 1–14.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Internet%2C%2BPhone%2C%2BMail%2C%2Band%2BMixed%2BMode%2BSurveys%3A%2BThe%2BTailored%2BDesign%2BMethod%2C%2B4th%2BEdition-p-9781118456149
Eimer, A., & Bohndick, C. (2023). Employability models for higher education: A systematic literature review and analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8, 100588.
Ergün, M., & Şeșen, H. (2021). A comprehensive study on university students’ perceived employability: Comparative effects of personal and contextual factors. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211036105.
Grosemans, I., De Cuyper, N., Forrier, A., & Vansteenkiste, S. (2023). Graduation is not the end, it is just the beginning: Change in perceived employability in the transition associated with graduation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 145, 103915.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/3rd-edition-a-primer-on-pls-sem-1
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://online.aliat.edu.mx/adistancia/InvCuantitativa/LecturasS4/Hernandez_Sampieri_Cap._7_disenos_no_experimentales.pdf
Hernández Chocano, A. A., & Hernández Chocano, L. L. (2022). Educación virtual y satisfacción de estudiantes en enfermería del Instituto de Educación Superior Tecnológico Fernando León de Vivero, Ica–2022 (Tesis de maestría). Universidad Católica de Trujillo. https://repositorio.uct.edu.pe/bitstreams/8de9d9b0-7c11-4134-9536-1bd7910ed54c/download
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462551910
Li, H., Khattak, S. I., & Shamim, M. A. (2024). Quality culture, university-industry collaboration, and perceived employability among vocational students in China: A Yanpei Huang perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1439097. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439097/pdf
Lohr, S. L. (2010). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole. https://books.google.com/books/about/Sampling.html?id=VdwgPwAACAAJ
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models. Behavior Research Methods, 55(3), 1157–1174.
Melean Romero, R. A., et al. (2024). Service quality, loyalty building and institutional image at a university in Lima, Peru using structural equations. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1365219. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1365219/full
Ministerio de Educación del Perú. (2024). Informe de evaluación 2023 del PESEM – Educación. MINEDU. https://www.minedu.gob.pe/normatividad/pesem/informe-evaluacion-2023-pesem.pdf
Noguera, I., Quesada-Pallarès, C., & Sepúlveda-Parrini, P. (2024). Analysing student satisfaction with teaching strategies in vocational education. Education + Training.
OECD. (2025). Higher education in Portugal: Policies for access and success. OECD Publishing.
Santini, F. O., Ladeira, W. J., Sampaio, C. H., & da Silva Costa, G. (2017). Student satisfaction in higher education: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 1–18.
Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264.
Seitova, M., Temirbekova, Z., Kazykhankyzy, L., et al. (2024). Perceived service quality and student satisfaction: A case study at Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University, Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 9.
Sharma, A., Minh Duc, N. T., Thang, T. L., Nam, N. H., Ng, S. J., Abbas, K. S., et al. (2021). A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(10), 3179–3187.
Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 244–258.
Tutz, G. (2022). Ordinal regression: A review and a taxonomy of models. WIREs Computational Statistics, 14(1), e1545.
Villa-Castaño, L. E., & Durán-León, W. F. (2022). Satisfaction of business students with the quality of classes during the pandemic: A mixed study in the Latin American context. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(4), 548–565.
Wider, W. (2024). Service quality (SERVQUAL) model in private higher education institutions: A bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. https://www.sciencedirect.com/article/pii/S2590291124000020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
