IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION ON LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY AND POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN GENERAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Authors

  • Abdullah Anas Abdullah Fallatah King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
  • Amani Omar Safdar Collage of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University
  • Ruba Hussain Ahmed Abu Khizanah Collage of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University
  • Mona Hani Mohammedamin Tayib Collage of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University
  • Raghad Abdullah Alamer Collage of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University
  • Rani A Alsairafi Surgery department, College of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University
  • Abdulrahman A Alaryni Saudi Board of General Surgery, King Faisal Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n3.4575

Keywords:

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ERAS, General Surgery, Length of Hospital Stay, Postoperative Complications, Perioperative Care, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are multidisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative pathways designed to reduce surgical stress, enhance functional recovery, and improve postoperative outcomes. While ERAS implementation has frequently been associated with reduced length of hospital stay (LOS), its effect may vary across healthcare settings with already optimized perioperative and discharge practices. Objective: To evaluate the association between ERAS protocol implementation and length of hospital stay among general surgery patients, and to assess its impact on postoperative complications and early recovery indicators. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, using electronic medical records from January 2022 to December 2023. A total of 938 patients who underwent general surgery procedures were included and categorized into ERAS and non-ERAS groups. Demographic characteristics, surgical and anesthetic factors, postoperative recovery indicators, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Length of hospital stay was assessed using predefined duration categories. Comparative analyses were performed using chi-square tests and either t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Results: ERAS protocols were implemented in 91.3% of patients. No statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay was observed between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (89.6% vs. 90.2% with LOS < 1 week, p = .674). In contrast, ERAS implementation was associated with a significantly lower overall rate of postoperative complications (4.8% vs. 20.7%, p < .001), particularly gastrointestinal (1.5% vs. 12.2%, p < .001) and respiratory complications (0.5% vs. 3.7%, p < .001). Patients managed with ERAS protocols demonstrated improved early recovery indicators, including earlier tolerance of oral intake and reduced postoperative nausea. ICU admission rates were low in both groups, and hospital readmission rates showed a statistically significant but clinically small absolute difference. Conclusion: ERAS protocol implementation in general surgery is associated with substantial reductions in postoperative complications and improvements in early recovery outcomes. Although no reduction in length of hospital stay was observed—likely reflecting already optimized institutional discharge pathways—these findings support the continued integration of ERAS principles to enhance perioperative care quality.

References

Aleid, A., Alyaseen, E. M., Alfurayji, R. S., Alanazi, B. S., Alquraish, F. A., Al Mutair, A., Alessa, M., & Albinsaad, L. (2023). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in Saudi Arabian surgical practice: A comprehensive analysis of surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Cureus, 15(11), e49448. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49448

Batchelor, T. J. P., Rasburn, N. J., Abdelnour-Berchtold, E., Brunelli, A., Cerfolio, R. J., Gonzalez, M., Ljungqvist, O., Petersen, R. H., Popescu, W. M., Slinger, P. D., Naidu, B., & ERAS Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. (2019). Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 55(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy301

Fearon, K. C. H., Ljungqvist, O., Von Meyenfeldt, M., Revhaug, A., Dejong, C. H. C., Lassen, K., Nygren, J., Hausel, J., Soop, M., Andersen, J., & Kehlet, H. (2005). Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clinical Nutrition, 24(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002

Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Schwenk, W., Demartines, N., Roulin, D., Francis, N., McNaught, C. E., MacFie, J., Liberman, A. S., Soop, M., Hill, A., Kennedy, R. H., Lobo, D. N., Fearon, K. C. H., & Ljungqvist, O. (2012). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations. Clinical Nutrition, 31(6), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013

Kehlet, H., & Wilmore, D. W. (2002). Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. The American Journal of Surgery, 183(6), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8

Li, L., Jin, J., Min, S., Liu, D., Liu, L., & Yu, D. (2017). Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 96(31), e8432. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008432

Ljungqvist, O., Scott, M., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2017). Enhanced recovery after surgery: A review. JAMA Surgery, 152(3), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952

Melnyk, M., Casey, R. G., Black, P., & Koupparis, A. J. (2011). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice? Canadian Urological Association Journal, 5(5), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.11002

Qin, X., Yin, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2024). A retrospective cohort study on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Scientific Reports, 14, 18171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69150-8

Ripollés-Melchor, J., Ramírez-Rodríguez, J. M., Casans-Francés, R., Aldecoa, C., Abad-Motos, A., Logroño-Egea, M., García-Erce, J. A., Camps-Cervantes, A., Ferrando, C., & POWER Study Investigators Group. (2019). Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. JAMA Surgery, 154(8), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0995

Wang, B., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Wang, P., Yao, D., Huang, Y., Zhou, Z., Zhen, L., Yu, C., Xie, T., & Li, Y. (2024). Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on surgical site infection and postoperative recovery outcomes: A retrospective study of 1276 cases. Scientific Reports, 14, 24055. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74389-2

Weets, V., Meillat, H., Saadoun, J. E., Dazza, M., de Chaisemartin, C., & Lelong, B. (2024). Impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer. Annals of Coloproctology, 40(5), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121

Wu, C. L., King, A. B., Geiger, T. M., Grant, M. C., Grocott, M. P. W., Gupta, R., Miller, T. E., Thacker, J. K. M., & American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative. (2019). American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative joint consensus statement on perioperative opioid minimization in opioid-naïve patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 129(2), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004063

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Fallatah, A. A. A., Safdar, A. O., Khizanah, R. H. A. A., Tayib, M. H. M., Alamer, R. A., Alsairafi, R. A., & Alaryni, A. A. (2026). IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IMPLEMENTATION ON LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY AND POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN GENERAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Veredas Do Direito, 23, e234575. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n3.4575

Issue

Vol. 23 (2026): Veredas do Direito, v. 23, 2026

Section

Articles

License

I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.

I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.

 

Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0