JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO PROCEDURAL CRIMINAL PROVISIONS

Authors

  • Ali Abdulhadi Hamid
  • Ammar Turki Atiyah Al-Saadoun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6355

Keywords:

Amendment, Procedural Text, Justifications, Justice, Procedural System

Abstract

Formal grounds for constitutional change refer to the reasons or justifications that support undertaking an amendment or alteration to the constitution, focusing on procedural and structural aspects. Insofar as these grounds relate to amending constitutional provisions, they bear an impact on criminal procedural texts. This study will be confined to the most significant of these grounds, namely: the ground related to procedural criminal justice, given its governing role over criminal procedural provisions; and the second ground, which concerns enhancing confidence in criminal procedural texts. Accordingly, this study is divided into two sections: the first addresses the realization of procedural criminal justice, while the second focuses on strengthening confidence in the criminal procedural system.

References

Al-Assar, Y. M. (1999). Dawr al-iʿtibārāt al-ʿamaliyya fī al-qaḍā’ al-dustūrī (The role of practical considerations in constitutional adjudication). Arab Renaissance House.

Al-Harmoush, A. H. S. (2023). Naẓariyyat tanfīdh al-ḥukm al-jazā’ī (Dirāsa muqāranah) (Theory of criminal judgment enforcement: A comparative study) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kufa, College of Law).

Alia, S. (n.d.). Al-qānūn al-dustūrī al-jazā’ī (The constitutional criminal law).

Al-Nefiawi, I. A. (2000). Inʿikāsāt al-qawāʿid al-ijrā’iyya ʿalā adā’ al-ʿadāla (Implications of procedural rules on the performance of justice). Arab Renaissance House for Publishing and Distribution.

Al-Shukri, A. Y. (2017). Al-Aḥkām al-ʿāmmah li-īghāl al-naṣṣ al-ʿiqābī (General provisions for the repeal of the penal norm: An analytical comparative applied study). Zain Legal Publications.

Angèle, K, M. (n.d.). The philosophical foundations of criminal law. University of Amiens, Department of Philosophy.

Benshrif, M., & Benta, F. (n.d.). Legal security and judicial security. Droit Maroc. Retrieved February 10, 2025, from https://www.marocdroit.com

Constitution of the Republic of Iraq (2005).

Court of Cassation of Iraq. (2022, July 24). Decision No. 13828/Criminal Chamber/2022. https://www.sjc.iq/qview

Faraj, S. O. (2019). Al-amn al-qānūnī al-jinā’ī (Dirāsa taḥlīliyya) (Criminal legal security: An analytical study) (Master’s thesis, University of Sulaymaniyah, College of Law).

Federal Supreme Court of Iraq. (2019, May 21). Decision No. 38/Federal/2019. https://www.iraqfsc.iq

Ghmija, A. (2009). The principle of legal security and the necessity of judicial security. Moroccan Journal of Law, (7).

Husni, M. N. (n.d.). Al-dustūr wa al-qānūn al-jinā’ī (The constitution and criminal law).

Ibrahim, K. R. M. (2016). Mustaqbal al-siyāsa al-jinā’iyya al-tashrīʿiyya (The future of legislative criminal policy) (Doctoral dissertation, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Law).

Iraqi Code of Criminal Procedure No. 23 of 1971 (as amended).

Muhisin, A. Z. (2010). Balancing legal security and the principle of retroactivity of constitutional rulings. Kufa Studies Center Journal, (18), University of Kufa.

Murad, B. A. (2021). Determinants of criminal text and its impact on achieving legal security. Algerian Journal of Public and Comparative Law, 7(2).

Mustafa, M. M. (1988). Sharḥ qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyya (Explanation of the Criminal Procedure Code) (6th ed.). Arab Renaissance House.

Salim, H. A. M. (2022). Constitutional components for achieving judicial security. Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Research, (39).

Sarour, A. F. (n.d.). Al-qānūn al-jinā’ī al-dustūrī (Constitutional criminal law).

Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt. (1996, February 3). Case No. 33/16. https://www.sccourt.gov.eg

Tharwat, J.,&Abdel-Moneim, S. (1996). Uṣūl al-muḥākamāt al-jazā’iyya (Al-daʿwā al-jinā’iyya) (Principles of criminal procedure: The criminal case). University Foundation for Studies, Publishing and Distribution.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Hamid, A. A., & Al-Saadoun, A. T. A. (2026). JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO PROCEDURAL CRIMINAL PROVISIONS. Veredas Do Direito, 23(7), e236355. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6355