INTERFACES ENTRE INOVAÇÃO ABERTA E GOVERNANÇA MULTINÍVEL: UMA REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6683Keywords:
Inovação Aberta, Governança Multinível, Revisão Integrativa, Stakeholders, Ecossistemas de InovaçãoAbstract
A literatura sobre Inovação Aberta evidencia que o processo de inovação depende cada vez mais da interação entre organizações, setores e diferentes atores. Em contextos marcados por elevada complexidade e interdependência, torna-se essencial compreender as estruturas que coordenam os fluxos de conhecimento para além das fronteiras organizacionais. Este estudo buscou analisar como a literatura sobre Inovação Aberta incorpora, de forma explícita ou implícita, mecanismos associados a modelos de governança, incluindo abordagens multinível, colaborativa, em rede, policêntrica e relacional. Do ponto de vista metodológico, foi realizada uma revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases Scopus e Web of Science. A estratégia de busca identificou inicialmente 86 registros, resultando em 61 documentos após a remoção de duplicatas. A amostra final, composta por 44 artigos científicos, foi analisada por meio de uma abordagem qualitativa baseada em análise temática. Os resultados indicam que a Inovação Aberta é sustentada por arranjos de governança multinível, baseados em confiança, reciprocidade e interdependência entre os atores. Mesmo quando não explicitada, a Governança Multinível atua como infraestrutura institucional que organiza, estabiliza e legitima essas interações entre diferentes níveis organizacionais e territoriais. Como contribuição teórica, o estudo evidencia a complementaridade entre os construtos analisados. A Inovação Aberta permite compreender a dinâmica dos fluxos de conhecimento, enquanto a Governança Multinível oferece o suporte institucional necessário para sustentar processos colaborativos em contextos caracterizados pela dispersão de autoridade.
References
Aagaard, A., & Rezac, F. (2022). Governing the interplay of inter-organizational relationship mechanisms in open innovation projects across ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.003
Aakhus, M., & Bzdak, M. (2015). Stakeholder engagement as communication design practice. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1569
Abhari, K., Davidson, E., & Xiao, B. (2016). Taking open innovation to the next level: A conceptual model of social product development (SPD). https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=cxPvZQkAAAAJ&citation_for_view=cxPvZQkAAAAJ:zYLM7Y9cAGgC
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, C., & Miura, S. (2019). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636
Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318761797
Bereznoy, A. V., & Abotk, A. (2025). Nauchno-issledovatel'skie ekosistemy v innovatsionnom arsenale kompaniy “Bol'shoy Farmy”. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta, 23(3). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nauchno-issledovatelskie-ekosistemy-v-innovatsionnom-arsenale-kompaniy-bolshoy-farmy
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brilhante, L., & Romero, F. (2025). A literature exploration on challenges in open innovation in the public sector. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100904
Brockman, P., Khurana, I. K., & Zhong, R. (Irene). (2018). Societal trust and open innovation. Research Policy, 47(10), 2048–2065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.010
Cerreta, M., & Panaro, S. (2022). Collaborative decision-making processes for local innovation: The coull methodology in living labs approach. The Geojournal Library, 1, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78536-9_12
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Chiu, M.-L., & Lin, C.-N. (2022). Developing supply chain open innovation capability: The mediating role of the knowledge creation process, governance mechanism and technology as a driver. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100264
Clauss, T., & Spieth, P. (2017). Governance of open innovation networks with national vs international scope. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-07-2015-0057
Coscarello, M. (2025). Social innovation hubs: Experiences of incubators as promoters of territorial development and urban regeneration. Crisis, Conflict and Celebration, 1, 419–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9719-6_16
Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times. A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-08-2020-0242
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
Durmaz, A., Demir, H., & Sezen, B. (2021). The role of negative entropy within supply chain sustainability. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.014
Fang, P., Wan, L., & Fang, W. (2023). The choice of cooperative governance mechanism in open innovation projects under the synergy of the electricity – carbon market. Energies, 16(17), 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176110
Favarin, A. M., Dias, C. N., Filho, B. A. da C., & Bambini, M. D. (2024). Red como estrategia para romper silos y fomentar la innovación abierta. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2024230241.es
Gadille, M., & Siarheyeva, A. (2014). Limits to the construction of a community-based open innovation network and implications for specialisation of a small urban area. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 5(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkbd.2014.063992
Gesing, J., Antons, D., Piening, E. P., Rese, M., & Salge, T. O. (2014). Joining forces or going It alone? On the interplay among external collaboration partner types, interfirm governance modes, and internal R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12227
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA 2020: R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hong, S., & Ryu, J. (2019). Crowdfunding public projects: Collaborative governance for achieving citizen co-funding of public goods. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.009
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(02), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055403000649
Katsonis, M., & Botros, A. (2015). Digital government: A primer and professional perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 42–52.
Klievink, B., Bharosa, N., & Tan, Y.-H. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public–private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.002
Kornuta, L., Sarybaieva, H., & Shevchenko, N. (2026). Innovation economy management: European experience and ways of implementation in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-1-152-162
Liu, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). How does inter-organizational relational governance propel firms’ open innovation? A Conditional Process Analysis. Sustainability, 13(18), 10209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810209
Marcone, M. R. (2025). Sustainable supply chain in a new technological era: the case of the Italian agrifood sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-04-2024-0421
Mens, J., van Bueren, E., Vrijhoef, R., & Heurkens, E. (2025). Social value creation through bottom-up urban development: Mechanisms of self-organization. Planning Theory & Practice, 26(3), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2025.2526522
Mishra, D., & Maheshwari, N. (2023). Effective governance through crowdsourcing: A strategic framework for empowered participation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3218188
Moradi, M., Hepsø, V., & Schiefloe, P. M. (2024). Institutional complexity and governance in open-source ecosystems: A case study of the oil and gas industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100523
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2020). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787
Omidvar, O., & Kislov, R. (2016). R&D Consortia as Boundary Organisations: Misalignment and Asymmetry of Boundary Management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(02), 1650030. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919616500304
Onyango, G. (2024). Social processes of public sector collaborations in Kenya: Unpacking challenges of realising joint actions in public administration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02176-5
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & McGuinness, L. A. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi‐level governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. Journal of European Integration, 31(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802642755
Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: The normative challenge. Oxford University Press.
Reiter, A., Stonig, J., & Frankenberger, K. (2024). Managing multi-tiered innovation ecosystems. Research Policy, 53(1), 104905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104905
Resina, J. (2019). ¿Qué es y para qué sirve un laboratorio de innovación ciudadana? El caso del LABICxlaPaz. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 74. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n74.a182
Rodríguez-Núñez, E., Cervera-Taulet, A., & Periáñez-Cañadillas, I. (2025). Cities in flux: harnessing open innovation to enhance urban management. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(3), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2025-0014
Rose, T. M., & Manley, K. (2012). Adoption of innovative products on Australian road infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics, 30(4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.665173
Scott, S., Hughes, M., & Kraus, S. (2018). Developing relationships in innovation clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1-2), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537145
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 333–339. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2020). Governance and performance in co-exploitation and co-exploration projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(5), 875–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-02-2019-0067
Souza, M. T. de, Silva, M. D. da, & Carvalho, R. de. (2010). Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo), 8(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
Sun, J., Xie, X., Zhou, M., & Liang, Y. (2023). How to drive green innovation of manufacturing SMEs under open innovation networks – the role of innovation platforms’ relational governance. Management Decision, 63. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2022-1452
Szozda, N., & Świerczek, A. (2022). Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products. Electronic Markets, 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00533-3
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Weiming, Y., & Weidong, M. (2018). Alliance portfolio management, cooperation pattern and firm performance. Foreign Economics & Management, 40(07), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.07.003
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2022). Fostering regional innovation, entrepreneurship and growth through public procurement. Small Business Economics, 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00466-9
Zhou, Q., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Xu, W. (2025). Knowledge governance and innovation ambidexterity in the platform context: exploring the role of knowledge transformation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2024-0256
Zyl, I. V., & Kroeze, J. H. (2014). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) - AMCIS 2014 Proceedings: Transdisciplinarity in Information Systems: Extended Reflections. Aisnet.org. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2014/ISPhilosophy/GeneralPresentations/1/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
