TERRITORIAL-BASED COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC SECURITY GOVERNANCE: A COMMUNITY POLICING MODEL IN URBAN, TOURISM, AND RURAL AREAS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PURWAKARTA POLICE RESORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6411Keywords:
Collaborative Governance, Public Security, Community Policing, Territorial Differentiation, Purwakarta Police ResortAbstract
Public security can no longer be governed through an approach that is entirely reactive, uniform, and police-centered. The complexity of urban spaces, tourism areas, and rural communities requires a more collaborative, adaptive, and territorially sensitive model of security governance. This study aims to analyze territorial-based collaborative public security governance through a community policing model within the jurisdiction of the Purwakarta Police Resort. Specifically, it examines the existing implementation of community policing, identifies the driving and inhibiting factors of collaboration, and formulates a public security governance model aligned with the characteristics of urban, tourism, and rural areas. This study employs a qualitative approach with an embedded single-case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis across three units of analysis: Purwakarta Kota, Jatiluhur, and Kiarepedes. The findings show that community policing has been implemented through the Forum Kemitraan Polisi dan Masyarakat (FKPM), dialogic patrols, community visits, conflict mediation, local forums, and digital communication. However, these practices have not yet become fully systemic and sustainable. The findings also indicate that public security strategies need to be differentiated according to territorial characteristics: urban areas require rapid response and technological support, tourism areas require cross-sectoral coordination, and rural areas require the strengthening of social capital and community resilience. The main contribution of this study is the formulation of the Adaptive Territorial Collaborative Security Governance Model, which emphasizes territorial differentiation, hybrid institutional arrangements, multi-actor leadership, socio-material networks, and contextual outcomes.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik kriminal 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. European Commission.
Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (2001). The new structure of policing: Description, conceptualization, and research agenda. National Institute of Justice.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill.
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Aston, E. V., O’Neill, M., Hail, Y., & Wooff, A. (2023). Information sharing in community policing in Europe: Building public confidence. European Journal of Criminology, 20(4), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211037902
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. European Commission.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Choi, K., & Lee, J.-L. (2016). Citizen participation in community safety: A comparative study of community policing in South Korea and the UK. Policing and Society, 26(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.922087
Diphoorn, T., & van Stapele, N. (2021). What is community policing? Divergent agendas, practices, and experiences of transforming the police in Kenya. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(1), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa004
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
ESPON. (2013). ESPON TANGO: Territorial approaches for new governance. ESPON.
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill.
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
