APPROACHES AND INSTRUMENTS OF STATE SUPPORT MEASURES FOR MARITIME ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.6337Keywords:
Maritime Policy, State Support, Instruments, Measures, EfficiencyAbstract
Introduction. Maritime economic activity is important for states with long coastlines. State support enables participants in maritime activities to maintain strong competitive positions. Purpose. To develop proposals for improving state support instruments in order to increase the efficiency of maritime activities. Methodology and Methods. The application of a state-centered approach makes it possible to take into account priority national interests in maritime activities. Based on content analysis of international and Russian legislation and a comparative analysis of foreign practice, the possibility of applying elements of foreign practice to the development and regulation of maritime activities is examined. Results. It was found that “chronic” and systemic barriers limiting effectiveness still remain. It was determined that the emergence of new technologies and the transition to an import-substitution policy in shipbuilding have not received sufficient up-to-date regulatory support. The activities of governing bodies aimed at improving support instruments, both in sectoral and functional aspects, are argued for and substantiated. Conclusions. The development of existing instruments and the adjustment of approaches to granting state support measures will increase the effectiveness of national maritime policy.
References
1. Pallis, A. A. (2017). EU common policy in the field of maritime transport: The Europeanization of policy in the 1990s. Routledge.
2. Kolesnikova, M. (2017). Maritime policy of the European Union and its economic aspects. Contemporary Europe, (4), 78–86.
3. Kolesnikova, M. (2024). Maritime spatial planning in the EU: Main results. Contemporary Europe, (2), 32–44.
4. Bodansky, D., & Pomerance, R. (2021). Sustaining the Arctic in order to sustain the global climate system. Sustainability, 13, Article 10622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910622
5. Biedermann, R. (2021). China’s impact on the European Union’s Arctic policy: Critical junctures, crossovers, and geographic shifts. Asia Europe Journal, 19, 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-021-00605-7
6. McCauley, D., Pettigrew, K. A., Bennett, M. M., Todd, I., & Wood-Donnelly, C. (2022). Which states will lead a just transition for the Arctic? A DeePeR analysis of global data on Arctic states and formal observer states. Global Environmental Change, 73, Article 102480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102480
7. Sinitsin, S. A. (2023). Civil shipbuilding in Russia and foreign countries: Status, problems, and prospects for law and economics. International Public and Private Law, (1), 44–51.
8. Neupokoev, M. A. (2021). Vectors of development of Russia’s maritime activities (on the drafting and revision of regulatory legal acts in the field of maritime activities). Military Thought, (12), 6–11.
9. Dudkina, K. A., & Frolova, V. A. (2023). Current problems in implementing state support measures to stimulate the renewal of the fishing fleet. Proceedings of the Krylov State Research Centre, 2(404), 165–172.
10. Osipov, V., Zhilina, L., & Astafurova, I. (2016). Practice of state support for shipbuilding in foreign countries. Izvestiya FEFU. Economics and Management, (1), 77–86.
11. Malyshev, I. I. (2020). Current issues in the development of state support measures for the shipbuilding industry. Modern Issues of Innovative Economy, (7), 100–110.
12. Casimiro, D., & Guerreiro, J. (2019). Trends in maritime spatial planning in Europe: An approach to governance models. Journal of Environmental Protection, 10, 1677–1698. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2019.1012100
13. Baldwin, K., & Mahon, R. (2014). A participatory GIS for marine spatial planning in the Grenadine Islands. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 63(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00452.x
14. Horton, G., Finney, H., Fischer, S., Sikora, I., McQuillen, J., Ash, N., & Shakeel, H. (n.d.). Technological, operational and energy pathways for maritime transport to reduce emissions towards 2050. https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/Technological-Operational-and-Energy-Pathways-for-Maritime-Transport-to-Reduce-Emissions-Towards-2050.pdf
15. Fisenko, A. I. (2009). Current state and main tasks of personnel training in higher education institutions of the maritime and river transport profile under conditions of the formation of an innovative economy. Modern Problems of Science and Education, (5). https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=1869
16. Skrynnik, A. M. (2021). System of training, retraining, and advanced training of senior management personnel in the sphere of public administration of maritime economic activity: A brief historical and legal aspect. Transport Law and Security, 4(40), 28–35.
17. Zenkin, M. A. (2021). Sectoral supplementary education for children in the field of maritime activities: Models and practices in Russia and abroad. Pro Dom, 6(36), 40–51.
18. Denselow, S., & Noble, J. (2018, May). How Sea Cadets helps young people today: A summary of the evidence. Sea Cadets of the United Kingdom. https://www.sea-adets.org/userfiles/files/SC%20Impact%20Report%20online.pdf
19. Henstock, M., Barker, K., & Knijnik, J. (2013). 2, 6, heave! Sail training’s influence on the development of self-concept and social networks and their impact on engagement with learning and education: A pilot study. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 17(1), 32–46.
20. Hindle, J. (2014, February). Survey into the effectiveness of R. Tucker Thompson sail training programmes. Sail Training International. https://sailtraininginternational.org/research/survey-effectiveness-r-tucker-thompson-sail-trainingprogrammes/
21. Tarkhanova, L. B. (2012). Maritime activity as a subject of interdisciplinary research. Problem Analysis and Public Administration Project Design, (2), 43–57.
22. Meisner, V. I. (1932). Fundamentals of fisheries: General introduction. Snabtekhizdat.
23. Baranov, F. I. (1918). On the question of the biological foundations of fisheries (pp. 84–128). [Publisher not identified].
24. Titova, G. D. (2007). Bioeconomic problems of fisheries in zones of national jurisdiction. VVM.
25. Sherman, K., et al. (2005). A global movement toward an ecosystem approach to management of marine resources. Marine Ecology, 275–279.
26. Denisov, V. V. (2002). Ecological and geographical foundations of sustainable environmental management in shelf seas (Ecological geography of the sea). Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
27. Voitolovsky, G. K. (Ed.). (2010). Theory and practice of maritime activities: Issue 17. Innovative management technologies. SOPS.
28. Kolesnikova, M. (2023). Global ambitions of the European Union: The maritime agenda. International Affairs, (3). https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/2800
29. Bilbao-Ubillos, J., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Payán-Azque, R. (2021). State aid, EU maritime transport policy, and the competitiveness of EU member states’ fleets. European Transport Research Review, 13, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00463-1
30. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14, 1992. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/agenda21.shtml
31. Mediapaluba. (n.d.). The government of South Korea allocated $544 million in state support for shipbuilding until 2028. https://paluba.media/news/61685
32. OECD. (2024). Peer review of the Danish shipbuilding industry (OECD Reviews of Shipbuilding Economy). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5ec9003b-en
33. European Commission. (2025). The Commission publishes the 2025 EU Blue Economy Report. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-publishes-2025-report-eu-blue-economy-2025-05-22_en
34. European Commission. (2025). The Commission publishes the 2025 EU Blue Economy Report. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-publishes-2025-report-eu-blue-economy-2025-05-22_en
35. Korabel.ru. (n.d.). The United States is preparing a package of laws on reviving shipbuilding and supporting shipping. https://www.korabel.ru/news/comments/ssha_gotovyat_paket_zakonov_o_vozrozhdenii_sudostroeniya_i_podderzhke_sudohodstva.html
36. OECD. (2023). State support to industrial sectors: Consolidated report (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 270). OECD Publishing.
37. Government of the Russian Federation. (2021, October 18). Resolution No. 1766 on amendments to the State Program of the Russian Federation “Development of shipbuilding and equipment for offshore field development”. ConsultantPlus. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_398717/92d969e26a4326c5d02fa79b8f9cf4994ee5633b/
38. Government of the Russian Federation. (2021, October 18). Resolution No. 1766 on amendments to the State Program of the Russian Federation “Development of shipbuilding and equipment for offshore field development”. ConsultantPlus. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_398717/92d969e26a4326c5d02fa79b8f9cf4994ee5633b/
39. Government of the Russian Federation. (2023, November 3). Order No. 3097-r on approval of the strategic direction in the field of digital transformation of the transport sector of the Russian Federation until 2030. Garant. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/407851313/
40. Government of the Russian Federation. (2019, October 28). Order No. 2553-r: Strategy for the development of the shipbuilding industry for the period until 2036 and for the longer term until 2050 (as amended by Order No. 1181-r of May 12, 2025). ConsultantPlus. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_336470/856cfad0e3747dc2a99bc71a6b0769d51ac023d8/
41. Government of the Russian Federation. (2021, February 6). Order No. 255-r on approval of the Concept for Personnel Training for the Transport Complex until 2035. Garant. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/400210182/
42. SeaNews. (n.d.). Measures of economic support for maritime entrepreneurship. https://seanews.ru/2022/03/03/ru-mery-jekonomicheskoj-podderzhki-morskogo-predprinimatelstva/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I (we) submit this article which is original and unpublished, of my (our) own authorship, to the evaluation of the Veredas do Direito Journal, and agree that the related copyrights will become exclusive property of the Journal, being prohibited any partial or total copy in any other part or other printed or online communication vehicle dissociated from the Veredas do Direito Journal, without the necessary and prior authorization that should be requested in writing to Editor in Chief. I (we) also declare that there is no conflict of interest between the articles theme, the author (s) and enterprises, institutions or individuals.
I (we) recognize that the Veredas do Direito Journal is licensed under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
